(Previous)…..(Content)…..(Next)

……

Blasphemy?

When beliefs meet science

(Romanian)

U: Before we communicate, let me hear your opinion! Can you make what follows look like an intro?!?

Well, I decided that the introduction was described earlier?!?

U: That was my introduction. To inspire you?!? I mentioned science…

Try to use your perceptions and accumulations! intervene Presence (U). I will intervene where I consider or you request something specific… Something about you, please!

Yes, the title of the subchapter gave me a clue that I am a Christian, and what follows will take into account any idea of “faith” that I have encountered throughout my life, just as it will take into account the conquests of science that I have had access until the time of writing this book… I cannot give up the need to argue…

And, even if it will seem to be a departure from dogma, going through the lines “synthesized” by me (?!?) it will be noticed that either it can be about some kind of evolution of my faith, or it can be about access staggered, chronological to the conquests of science… Everything in a kind of comparison that reveals, in fact, the same “things”…

Maybe I was wrong, researching everything other people discovered, experienced, etc., and recording what they thought would be important for those to come. Even my dogma as a Christian says, “Believe and do not investigate!” or other restrictive things regarding the interpretation of the dogma…

Or you don’t have the power of perception and interpretation, a thought intervenes that seems sent by the Presence.

But I discovered that all those considered to be pagans, heretics, unbelievers, infidels, etc., say the same things, in other words, and often with different interests… Just as I noticed that there are examples of people killed for telling a truth that “came out” from dogma, but later the “reason” for their death, the truth, was accepted and confirmed.

Regardless of who issued the “judgment” (forbidden, by the way) that led to these cruel injustices…

Moreover, as I had access to “ancient” religious writings, including “modern” Bibles and their “well and correctly translated and adapted” counterparts, my questions grew. And, as a sort of response, my study-oriented effort was also increasing.

It was not a big surprise to me to notice that the true word of the Supreme Divine Power was permanently modified by the “powerholders” of fate, regardless of who empowered them but, always, they being “connected” to the Supreme Divine Power based on all kinds of visionary, prophetic, and similar “criteria”.

Moreover, each “great empowered” as he “appeared”, through the translation and/or interpretation of the holy books, gave birth to a new religious “current”. Or he “laughed” everything that was “heretical” by burning and/or killing, and thus “laughed” old religions, regardless of whether it was the same religion,n but necessary to be transformed by his (not “His”) gesture.

But I am not going to comment on the great “dissonances” that arise from a single type of effort, that of comparing the old “holy books” with the current “holy books”…

The important thing to remember is that I have taken into account (analysis, synthesis, study, etc.) all the holy writings to which I had access, with respect, without omitting any of them…

Another important “detail”… For many years of my life, I studied how knowledge influences perception. Now is not the time when I will “lay down” in a book all my studies in this regard! But I mentioned this “influence” because it shaped my approach, understanding that everything, everything, tells the same story.

Therefore, what I have to convey through this introduction is a kind of advice for those who are starting to go through this “work”…

Most of the people who declare themselves to be part of a certain religion, belief, cult, etc. have as their main point of reference some kind of conformity to that religion, which will place them (often this cataloging starting directly from that person, often dogmatic) in sinners, believers, fanatics, practitioners or in the clear demarcation of atheists or, brutally, against any “opposite”, “incorrect” religion, blah, blah…

Everything is based only on the level of acceptance of the dogma, a kind of manifestation of the deep or superficial acceptance of the dogma. Or, as I pointed out before, a certain level of general knowledge…

A knowledge that would quickly lead to a kind of continuation of the search for a kind (another kind) of truth and not a stagnation at the level of dogma… A “more complete” truth, superior to the dogmatic one…

Or, simply, to look for the true dogma, what from the “Beginning”, minorly modified by human smallness, be it also of a level of knowledge that can radically influence the translation, the transcription of the “word of the Supreme Divine Power” (possibly “Creator”) at the time of its perception…

In what follows, there will be nothing compatible with such a thing… In any religion, only the Supreme Divine Power has the right to judge and, by no means, the people, whether they are “chosen” of a particular religion…

It will only be a kind of “putting together” what the religions declare to be sent directly from the “Creator” with what scientists have discovered…Corrected, if permitted, by what the Presence gives me…

What will follow, as you will see, is a kind of acceptance that the truth belongs to both currents of thought, both the religious type (without dogma, which attracts the idea of judgment) and the scientific type…

For example, one of the religions, if it can be called that, ignores the question of the origin of the universe, of the world, considering it even useless. As well as the other questions related to the metaphysical essence of such questions, concretizing everything in the “parable of the poisoned arrow”…

The basic message of this parable would be that humans should not concern themselves with such questions, compared to “a poisoned arrow”, but should concern themselves with his immediate problems (of “Now”), to remove from the flesh as quickly as possible that arrow and do not prolong its presence in the flesh until he has the answer to his questions.

This is because the “poisoned arrow” will attract death long before a human has an answer to their questions, the basic effort being only to focus on saving the being from the suffering that existence entails.

But that was true then… In the meantime, human knowledge has advanced, and it is time for new perceptions…

It is necessary to clarify the errors of all other religions that venture into this search for the “poisoned arrow” and “translate” the genesis using human knowledge at the level of the moments when that myth, that “divine book”, etc,. was initiated.

In a short “review”, general perceptions “inform” us that, in the beginning, there was chaos, darkness, etc. The thought, the word, the sacrifice, etc., followed and the formation of the sky (with stars, planets, etc.) and the Earth (with waters, earth, and everything that will follow: plants, animals, etc.) will follow…

Man (Human)is “something” made of clay, mud, etc., in the image and likeness of the creator divinity, that is the Supreme (Yahweh, God, Allah, Pan-Ku, Dao, Ptah, Marduk, Mahaa-Vishnu, Brahma, Phyva, Chaos, Viracocha, Tangri, Num, Sombol-Burkan, Ocirvani, and Tsagan-Sukurty, etc) or that it is only about some simple “divine workers” (Jesus and “Satanail”, Nammu, Aruru, En-Ki, Prometheus and Epimetheus, Izanagi, and Izazami, Ahura Mazda and Angra Maynu, Odin, Vili, and Ve, “animal” and/or paradisiacal creative or sacrificial entities, demons, demiurge, etc.), who was given divine breath.

It is interesting that, in the vast majority of cases, man is very close to divine nature, at least at the beginning of his evolution, immediately after his creation.

Then, in general, man is submissive, idiotic, or intelligent, being obliged to respect the commands given by the divinity and not to violate the precepts of the sacred order, which ensures both the smooth running of the universal world and of human society.

In other versions, human is created to be exploited, oppressed, experience suffering, etc…

But in all these perceptions, the final creation was always human, no matter how useful he was, how stupid or clever, how good or bad, how gullible, faithful or otherwise…

In conclusion, for the most part, human was from the beginning something good, blessed by the Supreme Divine Power that liked what he created, which later became evil, attracting in the vast majority of myths, religions, beliefs, etc. the flood, the cleanliness, which was and will come, with or without certainty… And/or many, many other tests, temptations, punishments, tortures, etc. one more horrible, perverse, unjust, etc. than the other…

The reason, for example, from the holy book of my Christian faith, being, the pinnacle of dogma, the knowledge of good and evil (the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil) and not simple knowledge…

So, at least for this first book (“Genesis”), the essential approach will be a kind of amalgamation of all knowledge, sciences, and beliefs, starting from a kind of “Beginning” accessible to the knowledge of this moment of human up to “Human”, including the one from these times, in which I “lay down” these lines.

And, even if my approach will be fundamentally Christian, I have already emphasized that all faiths say the same things, and describe the same gestures, situations, facts, etc., with the particularity attracted by knowing the moment of birth of dogmas, beliefs, indications, prophecies, etc…

Why this effort?!? Why did the “divine writings” proceed to decipher the “poisoned arrow”?!?

(U) Because we, the Divine Powers, do not like the smallness of human interpretation… It is true that without us all, this would not have happened… We needed those experiences for the evolution of the closing of our contradictions, complete Presence…

Obviously, at the human level, the value of the individual lies in his deeds, in his evolution, going as far as the anathema that “the past defines man”, “concentrating” everything only on judgment (in the sense of identifying the correct punishment) or, in the happier case, upon the “conditional” finding of his evolution…

Losing along the way is a kind of approach related to knowing that man in close relation to his work. You cannot know a man if you do not know his evolution. The knowledge that necessarily needs equal value with that of the analyzed, the “judgment”…

You cannot know a man, an individual, alongside his entity, his “container,” if you do not know the whole…

And hence, you cannot know the Supreme Divine Power unless you know the real ability to get as close as possible to the necessary understanding of His doings. I hope you haven’t forgotten about “knowledge influences perception”?!?

That is why the “holy books” tried the “poisoned arrow” approach… To be able to convey something about the work of the Supreme Divine Power and help increase the chances of understanding this Power and thus increase the chances of changing the very perception to increase these chances…

But time has proven that Humans did not have the ability (and is just beginning in these times, now), knowledge to understand what was being transmitted to them. From here came the modifications of the “Word” of the Supreme Divine Power by man, and from here came the dogma… And, I still hope, from ignorance, from the impossibility of perceiving correctly, and not from “bad faith”.

For example, dogma eliminates all kinds of questions. That is why it is dogma. Not because it proves something, but because it only states something… It starts from a Truth, but afterward, you can only conclude that you need to search further or, worse, that “Half the Truth is a whole lie”… That the Power The Supreme Divine is used in one’s interest, under one’s knowledge…

Yes, by researching, you can have no other evolution than to get closer to the Supreme Divine Power by understanding more and more of its work. Understanding… Being, step by step, overwhelmed by the perceptions of this work…

So, one last “hint”… To those who are, willingly or unwillingly, constrained by their dogma and by their knowledge, I recommend them not to read this work and, very likely, the works to come!

And this is not because it will disturb their faith (conclusion drawn from hundreds, thousands of discussions whose results were “marked” and rejected in this way). Faith is faith, valuable, be it “as much as a mustard seed”! Our effort will strengthen their faith, for sure, but everything depends on their level of knowledge… On the desire and ability to know other than the dogma but related to it.

And, from here, the “dissensions” appear… Their knowledge does not allow them to understand the work of the Supreme Divinity, which is possibly what we are allowed to transmit here. It took me decades of real, deep study, experiences, and perceptions that helped me understand and accept some “things”…

And, from here, the rejection of the “pieces of truth” accessible to human knowledge (implicitly perception) and the return to dogma, to a kind of search in the “code of the holy books,” which will be restricted to their level of knowledge, to their power of perception locked in the same thing, in dogma…

Regardless of perceptions, for many of us, it will be about a kind of “return” that will be like a kind of imbalance, a kind of sharpening of the desire for knowledge… What will result in an increase in the effort to reject true knowledge and the deepening of dogmatic manifestations? Without meaning, without a real result…

But, in the background, for some people, unfortunately, the search will lead to some results manifested by the increase in the level of knowledge, regardless of the amplitude of this increase. Growth will depend on access to “materials”, on the possibility of comparing, synthesizing, etc., and, therefore, in my opinion, will increase the “adhesion” of that person to what I keep referring to here as the Supreme Divine Power.

Yes, I strongly affirm that any effort in the direction of knowledge brings you closer to the Supreme Divine Power. Understanding His work, you realize that it cannot be anything other than something worthy of veneration and love, to which you constantly convey your gratitude and love.

As a comparative example, coming from human smallness, a gracious priest, an Einstein, or the like quickly come to be revered by those around them for their deeds. Even bastards of fate, such as the great conquerors (I won’t name names), end up being revered for their crimes; it’s only fair…

But about the Supreme Divine Power, he was a Creator of worlds and not a destroyer of worlds to appropriate them and become a “great conqueror” (whatever the reason). It is easy to tell the difference… What is born of love, of creation, comes from the Supreme Divine Power… What is born of fear and destruction comes from “something else.”

What is born from knowledge brings you closer to the Creator; what is born from judgment (not to say dogma) is very close to “something else” (careful, I’m not judging).

The decades since I have been thinking about this book, since I have been sharing with ordinary people or believers (however fervent, dogmatic) the knowledge that attracted the birth of this book, either directly or through blogs, my website, etc., have proven this to my thing.

I’m not arrogant; I don’t pretend to be a “know-it-all”! I just practiced knowledge based on what others discovered, not mine. It belongs to me only to accumulate, analyze, and synthesize as neutrally as possible (you can’t be neutral), which is the basis of making a paper, a book, etc.

I finish with a short, real story from my life…

Heated discussion on religious topics… Trying to end the discussion, I don’t know what comes to mind or what to say to the person:

– In the end, regardless of what we have discussed, do you recognize that “A certain holy book” is the alphabet of faith, the book of beginnings, the beginning of any man’s journey?!?

My question was a trap, and the person answered “without blinking”: Yes!!! And came my answer:

– Well, I’m in college!

Answer that, at first glance, denotes arrogance. But it had the desired effect, that of stopping a pointless discussion.

The dogmatic and/or the human, without the necessary knowledge, cannot understand the “hidden” message conveyed by me. I was just stating that I am still at school, at college, at another level of knowledge, and not at the level of the first grade, where you learn the alphabet.

And I was judged (even by a “pastor”) with: “It is a great sin to think you are a great scholar in such matters. Pride is… blah, blah”. Without me having stated that, for example, “I’m getting my doctorate” or, at least, “I’m a graduate”… I’m just learning, but at another level of knowledge…

What I also invite you, those who have gone through this entire introduction…

Fiat Lux (Let there be Light)!

Merticaru Dorin Nicolae

(Previous)…..(Content)…..(Next)

……