(Previous)….(Content)…..(Next)

……

About Hologram Transfer and “Another Time”

The first “minutes” of energy

(Romanian)

If nothing became “Everything”, then why talk about the Big Bang, the “big bang”?!? It was a simple hologram transfer (as I described before).

Scientists speculate that “a fraction of a second” after this Big Bang was followed by a “huge explosion” in the form of a shock wave of energy that spread in all directions at an incredible speed, well above the “limit” speed of this universe, represented by the speed of light (of approximately 300,000 km/s).

Then, to explain the “overcoming” of this barrier, which they perceived to be a physical limit, scientists needed to invent a new unit of measurement for time, called “Planck time”.

A “time” is very well argued scientifically, but belongs to the current “means” of perception and interpretation.

For example, “Plank time” is associated with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, which “sets” (and ascertains) a lower limit for the simultaneous measurement of the position and momentum of a “matter” particle, assimilable to the energy manifestation that “concretes” perceptible in… Matter.

The principle is “due” (and deduced) to the fact that at this “Plank time scale”, the uncertainty is so large that one can no longer distinguish between events separated in time.

So, a kind of “threshold” where the “certainty” associated with time is “bounded” by the “uncertainty” associated with time.

The “Plank time” is the time it takes for a photon (of light) to travel on itself, a time equal to 5.39 x 10^–44 seconds, representing the shortest period possible in current physics and the smallest known “size” of about 1.6 x 10^–35 meters (about one hundred quintillion times smaller than a proton).

It is the shortest possible time interval because, at this scale of dimensions, the space-time geometry predicted by general relativity collapses, and the need for a theory of quantum gravity intervenes to be able to describe the laws of physics.

Let’s understand that this is where “time” comes from?!? Or we are discussing a strictly “energetic” theory, if I may say so, and which only “interacts” with matter.

To give you an idea, in one second, as you humans know it, there are more units of “Plank time” than all your seconds that have passed since the Big Bang until now. A concept which, even according to the “sayings” of scientists, “makes human intuition useless”.

Wouldn’t it be simpler if scientists were more attentive to their statements and accepted what would be an “instant” holographic transfer, this universe being from that very moment “All”, “Whole”, close to what it could be “imagined” strictly energetically?

Especially, they accept the idea that space simply expands, without perceiving “changes” in its descriptive dimensions physically, mathematically, blah, blah… Because, technically, physically, blah, blah, time does not even manifest itself if there is”. The hologram is transferred in its “constants” taken from any point of view, time, space, energy, information content, “manifestation”, etc. from the first Universe… This is the holographic “transfer”.

And there would be something more to say about this “Plank time”. Remember the “turn back time” looking into the “depths” of the universe from the previous half?!?

Well, as we look towards the “end” of the universe, traveling back in time, that observable part of the universe (as the dimension of the “manifestation” of perceptions) shrinks and becomes smaller and smaller, more compact, reaching “in final” to the size of a single Plank “size” unit, but also of Plank time.

But back to current knowledge, the “Big Bang” is described as unfolding, in terms of matter and not space, in an initial “period” of about 10 seconds (opinions are “divided”) of our time (and not “Planck time”). Anyway, let’s not forget that the “margin of error” of “scientific” deductions places the Big Bang 13.7^–13.8 billion years ago, so we’re “talking” about 0.1 billion years, that’s one hundred million years. What “great importance” would another ten “seconds” have?!?

This period of “manifestation” of the Big Bang begins with the “Age of Quantum Gravity” (some authors also call it the “Plank Era”), as that of pure energy manifestation and the beginning of the manifestation of gravity. All under unknown rules (relativistic physics is inapplicable, quantum physics having only “probabilistic solutions”) but resulting in the manifestation and “unification of physical forces”.

It is “estimated” that in the “first fraction” (a few “Plank times”) of a second after the Big Bang, the universe was “unimaginably” “hot” (10^32+ degrees — also called the Plank temperature of 1.4 x 10^32 degrees K) and in just 0.0(many zeros)1 “seconds” its “temperature” dropped from 100 billion (10^11) degrees (K or C, whichever).

According to scientists, the universe as we know it in size, but not in appearance, is born, this being a “furious” storm of “superheated” energy (although “superheated” is beside the point because it is, of fact also about energy — heat is the manifestation of energy, even “in matter”, and that’s it, possibly accepting the arguments of scientists compared to a maximum thermal level that can be encountered relatively theoretically).

An astonishing abundance of quarks, leptons, and virtual particles that represented the “comparable” energy value equal, identical, to the energy of the first Universe that completely translated its hologram, its content, of the third Universe, the one where you are, those who walk through these “written lines”.

Theoretically, also practically, the universe expanded and cooled, “reaching” the “parameters” identifiable to scientists, but also the start of the process of eliminating “chaos”, the indefinable, through an “order” imposed by the manifestation of physical forces.

Even the phenomena of “faith” have “identified” this process by “And the earth (the Universe, the All) was unformed and empty. Darkness was over the deep (space), and the Spirit of Divine Power moved over the waters (energy) (Genesis 1:2).

In this process of “expansion” and “cooling”, in the 0.0(many zeros)1 seconds, the “unification of physical forces” “manifested” around the “temperatures” of 10^28 degrees beginning the great “era” of the unified “universe” in which all four forces of the universe are considered to have manifested as one (hence the phrase “unified universe”).

The “Age of radiation” or “Age of quarks” “starts” at temperatures of 10^22 degrees, with gluons and quarks slowing down their “thermal” vibration, being able to interact with each other.

Neutrino particles appear to have played an important role in the early development of the universe, until, less than a second after the “Big Bang,” neutrinos no longer interacted with the matter as they have since “ second” to the present day, “imprinting” our scientific perceptions that I will describe “somewhat” a little later (when I describe the data obtained by COBE — COsmic Background Array and “the next”, and what the neutrino tracks tell us).

From this „point” to some extent, we can now discuss “more definitely” the “start of the disaggregation” of chaos, even if the processes of primordial nucleosynthesis (formation of atomic nuclei) had not “started”.

Albert Einstein also “talked” about this form of matter manifestation, years before anyone “talked” about the “Big Bang”, in his famous formula “energy = mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light” (E = m x c^2).

For everyone to understand, energy can be converted into mass (of course, and vice versa), and, in a continuity of reasoning, energy gave the possibility of the appearance of the universe’s mass (according to scientists).

From my point of view (and that of many researchers), this equation assumes that there is Plank time (in fact, there is time) because there is the “speed of light” (which has its “time content” being an expression defined by “meters per second (time)”, so it cannot exist without time).

But time will appear later, or the universe was already everything, mass, time… (light, radiation, and others). Paradoxical, isn’t it?

There is also a scientific, intuitive explanation, which states that, at this moment, distance cannot be “discussed” but only time (be it Planck time) because, certainly, every point of the expanding space was “there”, not physically moving…

Only space was moving to its dimensions. By expansion, by extension, by instantaneous holographic transfer… Even if he did it in time, either he or Plank. Or not?!?

So, the lack of mass of subatomic particles existing at this moment and the lack of distance and time to “justify” the speed of light brings us to the conclusion that the initial energy of the universe was “zero” (any of the “elements” of Einstein’s famous formula being zero results that the energy of the universe, even at this moment of creation, being zero… or infinite).

In addition, a “something” without mass can only have the speed of light, so mass is needed for a “something” to “slow down” and be something other than light.) … Under the conditions that scientists recognize, the speed of light was insignificant (in km/s) compared to the inferred “expansion” of space after the Big Bang.

Do you perceive their cyclical reasoning?!? In short, either it is accepted that the universe already had the full dimensions, it was “everything”, or it is accepted that time appeared from this moment, of the appearance of matter (but for that, the universe was at its dimension of “everything”) …

Even at this “point” of my description, the Universe looked nothing like what we might sense today.

It looked like a kind of energy soup in which energy became matter (in the form of aggregations that formed subatomic particles) and “matter” became energy again, against the background of instability given by the “much too high” energy content, content that thermally “dissolved” the particles subatomic particles that were forming, in a kind of “appears — disappears” game.

The world of physicists, especially those with the “quantum” specialization, describes even in these times that the subatomic world is in continuous manifestation (and, implicitly, change) in which subatomic particles at high energies produce instantaneous “translations” of position, of “manifestation ”, depending on the manifestations of the quark particles that compose them, changing both their “position and form of manifestation/existence” (the proton becoming a neutron or an electron and “vice versa”).

So, to some extent, “proportional” and effective at the quantum level, in the absence of immense energies (temperatures manifested as such after the Big Bang), what would be the difference from today?!?

Well, until the “steps of matter” (present in our days), there was a need for the manifestation of the basic laws of the material universe, which did not manifest constantly, mostly, but only increased their “weight”, “manifestation” against the background of “cooling”, and the decrease in the “thermal” level by distribution in the space that “expanded” almost “instantaneously”, thanks to the holographic “transfer”.

So, “cooling” was “needed” to proceed to the next “step”, that of “stabilizing” the atomic particles and subsequently the emergence of atoms. And let’s not forget the energy “investment” in radiation! For this reason alone, scientists have “declared” this “period” to be the “Age of Radiation”.

And the “cooling” was the translation of energy into something, not at all into space, into the resizing of the distribution over space. Simply put, the hologram “fills in” instantly.

Nevertheless, the so-called “Freeze-out” phase is reached, in which the hadrons remain stable in their “new identity”. It is also the moment when the arbitrary findings of nature “offer” the first real opportunity to shape the future of this material universe.

At this point, a scientific concept enunciated in 1979 by Alan Guth interferes with that of inflation theory. Wherever we look in the universe now, we find that there are an identical number of stars, galaxies, or similar formations to those that exist in the exact opposite part of the universe, regardless of the direction in which we look.

Of course, no one explains why this distribution exists, it being only the “replication” of our efforts in the first universe. It is as if a “line” of the universe encounters the opposite “line” of the universe, symmetrically, (identical in terms of structure, composition, etc.) in a pivotal point of “balance”.

Here, the inflation, which is the basis of the start of the “immense development” related to time, like an explosion of space “that brought chaos to order”, “describes” that “mirror” order now observed by scientists.

Additionally, gravity (a direct result of space-time distortions and the influence of the external universal layers of the multiverse) manifests itself “distorted” (“controlled”), incipiently, determining the distribution of matter in the universe we have today, gravitational waves can be “detected” (even if not visualized) by studying the microwave background of space and “sensing the distribution of matter in the universe”.

There would be something more to say about the “coagulation” of matter, as it was then and is detected nowadays by scientists. More specifically, why did it “coagulate” like this?

Well, it is a certainty in the scientific world that there are more dimensions than those “offered” by the human senses (be they also describable, at least “currently”, by a divine, possibly intuitive “word”). And, quite arguably, there are also more dimensions, more universes, and therefore more times… Maybe this is where the statement “in this time and this dimension” comes from.

Then there would be the holographic principle that can only reconstruct the “original”. So, everything can be a “holographic” reconstitution action, if you can say that, in another dimension, at another time.

Then there would be some kind of interaction of the multiverse on this universe, through gravity, the initial proto-matter group is also a result of the gravitational action of the “surrounding” universes…

Following these considerations, we reach a point from which, possibly, we can reach something different from the original through the intervention of “something”, through “divine” intervention, it doesn’t matter.

If everything is identical, like some kind of DNA replication or something like that, everything can stop here, at some kind of initial point from where a further evolution that implies the existence of time will take place, from “this moment”. But if there is a “something” that created some initial “system” (the first universe), is this system (the current one), at the very least, the next evolution?

Anyone who has worked in 3D graphics knows that “mirroring” helps to “efficiently” reconstruct any 3D object that is being worked on, later proceeding to “modeling”, customizing the respective object through asymmetric “corrections”.

If we consider a kind of starting point of a universe that will replicate “holographically”, or “gravitationally”, etc. we arrive at that “initial” type point where we will find a kind of starting point quite connected to a construction initial, possibly an initial evolution, from which the particularization appears.

So, here we have enough forms to describe those moments without going into the “cryptic” scientific language that describes this “coagulation”, even considering those described by the “primitive” language of those who tried to write down the word of divinities that described “primitively” what scientists say.

Much more could be said about the theory of inflation… For example, once “started” the inflation of the universe can no longer be stopped except in a place called by scientists “a new universe”. The “departure” point is the first universe, and the “arrival” point is the current universe, the one in which we “are”.

Something like, when inflation stops, it actually “closes” the “opening” of this “new universe”, when the holographic transfer will be completed by another “Freeze-out”, all three existing universes “synchronizing” and, especially, “superimposing” all its manifestations, constants, etc. like a single universe, the original one.

Ohhh, but let me come back! I have countless “parentheses” in the idea of completing the whole “picture” that I want to convey through this “earthling” …

And when the “redistribution” reached the “initial parameters”, those existing in the First and Second Universes, translated into this Universe, the other physical “laws” of the universes began to manifest, in addition to gravity, the first “great” law of the universes (toward “knowledge”, the other two great laws being the “weak force” and “electromagnetism” — the 4 great physical laws of the universes).

This is the moment when the sum of “forming” energy entities came into action to correct the “problems” of the new form of manifestation, a universe of matter, and implicitly, a universe of living beings.

For example, at this point in the “transfer,” it intervened to change the mass differences to “keep” an optimal imbalance of the number of protons to that of neutrons in the universe at that time, with about 7 protons for every neutron, an important ratio for our possibilities, of the entities, and for the material “modelings” that will follow.

For example, protons are the “base” for hydrogen and helium, the stellar fuel and building blocks for all other heavier elements in this universe.

The abundance of these charged particles over uncharged neutrons is what enables the elementary interactions that lead to chemistry and biology.

And, with the increase in the “weight” of subatomic particles, the “strong force” / “strong interaction” (the one that “holds together” the nuclear particles, implicitly the atoms), manifested itself, the second “great” law of the universes.

The “hard force” has this name because, for example, it is 137 times stronger than the electromagnetic force (which “holds” the distribution of different forms of energy), in the range of 10^–15 meters (one femtometer), of a million times (10^6) greater than the “weak force” (which “holds” certain types of radioactivity) and 10^38 times greater than gravity.

And, this “strong force” is “guilty” of the “clogging” of atomic nuclei, it “gathers” quarks into hadron particles such as protons and neutrons, limiting the emission of gluons (free radiation), considered to be the basis of the formation of atomic nuclei (I will not give further details).

But up to this point, we are only dealing with the “majority” interaction of radiation. Along with this radiation, photons filled the universe and collided, and interacted, this whole ensemble producing elementary material particles.

However, this “ensemble” had too much energy to produce “mass”.

Perhaps it is “true” that after about 3 minutes of existence, after the Big Bang, the temperature reaches about 900 million degrees Kelvin and the protons and electrons have the “ability” to recombine, but the temperatures immediately “shatter” the formed atomic nuclei, and…

I could send you “whole books” of what “happened” then, but I think the ones already described would be the most important “moments”.

And, from this point in my description, we reach the end of this “start” period, which delimits the “Radiation-dominated Age”, which will end with the so-called “Photon Age”, later with the formation of atoms, at the end of these 10 seconds, where “temperatures” of 3 x 10^3 degrees are manifested (but there is still a “long way” until then).

It’s starting to discourage me that I tend to “go over” the 3,000-word limit per “transmission” by a lot… But there is so much to “say” …

Merticaru Dorin Nicolae

(Previous)….(Content)…..(Next)

……