(Previous)….((Content))…..(Next)

……

The first “steps” of the energy and matter of this Universe

Is this universe mostly “empty” or incredibly “full”?

(Romanian)

We have been discussing the Big Bang and the early part of this Universe. And I kept emphasizing that it was nothing but a transfer in identical proportions of energy, information, etc. (The Hologram).

Later, argumentatively, I fell into the trap of scientists who know that “nothing is lost, everything is conserved”, at least from the point of view of energy, which is a constant for this universe, energy cannot be created or destroyed, but only having the “possibility” to transform from one form of “energy” to another.

In other words, there is a quantum of energy, which, whatever we do, we cannot decrease or increase.

So, at least apparently to scientists, the “total energy content” of this universe would be represented by a ratio of “universe energy” to “dark energy” of about “2 to 3”, where 26.6% is “energy universe”, about 5.4% is the “distribution” of energy in the form of matter (4.9% of “mass-energy”, 0.5% ordinary, baryonic matter, 0.005% radiation energy (electromagnetic waves propagating in space, such as light, X-rays, gamma rays, etc.), given mainly by the cosmic background radiation, and an “insignificant” percentage of “force field energy” given by the interaction between electrically and magnetically charged particles, such as be it electrons or protons) and 68% is “dark energy”.

So, your great “energetic” but also “material” universe is… Only 0.5% baryonic “ordinary matter”?!?

Going into the “details” of “ordinary matter” you will have new surprises. About 99.95% are protons and 0.05% are electrons.

Proton is made of quarks (considered “tangible elements” of matter) and gluons (“carriers” of “strong nuclear interaction”, which “binds quarks together”), elementary particles that form hadrons, blah, blah (you need a lot of study and “understanding” to continue detailing) …

The fact is that when one wants to “calculate” a percentage distribution of particles (according to the standard model of particle physics) considered as “matter” distinct from “energy”, big “problems” arise because the mass and energy of these particles depend on the “procedure by which they are measured” because any form of matter can be transformed into energy and vice versa if the necessary conditions exist.

From the scientists’ point of view, one possible approach is to calculate the fraction of momentum that each quark or gluon has in the proton, which is called the parton distribution function.

Quarks and gluons are effective constituents of hadrons, which can be thought of as quarks or gluons under certain experimental conditions. Parton distribution functions can be determined by deep inelastic scattering experiments, where an electron or photon “hits” a proton and observes the result.

According to multiple such experiments, the percentage distribution of partons in the proton is rough as follows: 55% gluons, 23% up quarks, 23% down quarks, and 1% other types of quarks (such as “strange”, “charm” quarks, “down” or “up”).

So, quarks, the “tangible” elements of matter, represent only 45% of so-called “matter” (with relative question marks about the “necessary conditions” that can determine the “association” with energy).

So, of that “0.5% “ordinary”, baryonic matter,” we are left with less than half, regardless of the “scientific” comments about “the quark particle is not only its “mass” energy, but also its kinetic energy and the energy associated with interactions between quarks and gluons (which is an “energy” expression, not a “mass” expression) …

Why did I make this short and rather boring “scientific introduction”?!?

In the previous description of the hologram transfer, we “skipped” the most important landmark, from our point of view, of energy entities, with the help of the expression “I could write whole books” …

My message would have been initiated when what you call the atoms of matter were “mostly” formed, making a clear demarcation between material atoms and immaterial atoms.

Demarcation that scientists make because of the idea of contact between matter and antimatter appears in their logic with the cancellation of both and their transformation into energy.

They describe that at this point the “titanic battle” between matter and antimatter began, and, in their opinion, the cancellation of most of the elements of “matter” that existed at that time. Since everything was energy, and the terms “matter” and “antimatter” are (certainly) “prematurely” used (in their circular logic), it is obvious that the meaning of “discussions” is quite different.

So different that I am obliged to send you an additional ‘new parenthesis) …

Even under the conditions of scientists’ perceptions, it is concluded that dark energy, even dark matter, is present in everything that would be the “subtle” constituent of this universe (including what they describe as the vacuum), without “taking into account” the layers of the multiverse.

They leave out in their “estimates” that one of the basic principles of physics says, “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction”.

In their Big Bang model, even later, “nowadays”, the Universe is expanding but nothing has a back-reaction (contraction) to allow it to expand. By analogy with human existence, they considered that there is a world external to an individual’s experiences, but there is also a world internal to the individual’s existence.

It follows that it is obvious that a limit condition of the division of this universe is the result of an external world (or more) and an internal one, as a whole, interacting as competing, stationary “forces” that produce limits.

And even if it were to indicate “something”, and not “forces”, that can only be dark matter, possibly dark energy, the only “something” that connects absolutely everything that would be matter.

So, that “something” “described” by the percentage “deducible” from the perceptions of scientists, of 0.5% “ordinary”, baryonic matter, it is obvious that the effort to understand the “phenomena” must be “oriented” on dark energy, dark matter… Perceived by “current” scientists as “mysterious” but which “is”.

“Looking” at existing data, this dark energy/matter is what defines space in “almost” its entirety, that “something” that is the source of all material things and that connects all these things. What we call space, the vacuum, is full (very, very dense) of this dark matter.

Perhaps this is why many scientists have concluded that we, the universe, exist inside a black hole.

Current quantum theory deduces this by also calculating the density of this “vacuum” (of dark matter). I quote from the most famous work in the field of gravity: “… the current quantum field theory eliminates by a renormalization process an energy density of the vacuum that would be considered infinite if it were not eliminated by this renormalization.”

Commenting on the “cryptic language of physicists”, in the current theory of the quantum field, the vacuum must have an extremely high level of density, for the existing equations to be valid, and to consider everything that happens at the atomic level.

This was a confirmation point that the vacuum is not empty, that space is, in fact, a fluctuation, the source of the existence of matter, and therefore of our reality.

Further, we must return to the “language of physicists” and see what normalization is.

Well, there are two types/genres of infinities in physics: an infinitely small number, which is usually neglected, and an infinitely large number (dangerously large — infinitely dangerous), where it is sought to be ignored through various procedures (or beliefs that the theory cannot be applied at that level).

This is how renormalization appears, from the “effort” to eliminate the infinitely “large” element.

The basic procedure, in this case, is to introduce a fundamental constant in the fragmentation of the number (which is thus no longer infinite).

In this case, the Plank length was used (and this Plank?!? — the number is remarkably close to the famous number “phi” = 1.618), so an “infinitely small” number (like the “infinitely small” Plank time) was used in the calculation of the events of the first seconds of the Big Bang, time and Plank length being the smallest things “created” by our Universe.

Let’s not forget that the Plank length (or time) is a limit condition, being a fundamental limit, corresponding to our own existence/experience. Using the Plank length, the vacuum was renormalized.

Thus, the researchers “took” a cubic centimeter of vacuum and calculated how many Plank lengths (length fluctuations) are contained in it, to obtain a finite number for the density of the vacuum (each Plank length “having” a mass “as much as” concrete of about 10^-5g — ???).

Thus, the fundamental density of a cubic centimeter of vacuum, according to some scientists, turned out to be 10 to the power 93 grams per cubic centimeter (10⁹³g/cm).

I don’t know if you realize how enormous this number is?!? It has been calculated that if we took everything visible in our Universe (billions of galaxies, with billions of stars each) and crammed it into a cubic centimeter, we would still not be able to “reach” the energy density of the vacuum.

So, our universe is extremely dense… Mostly ‘full’. That is why, even if I repeat myself, intuitively, some of the scientists “estimate” that our universe is a component of a black hole…

In the counterweight are other arguments by scientists who have estimated that the total mass density of the universe is between about 4.5 x 10^-28 kilograms per cubic meter “of the universe” and 9.9 x 10^-27 kilograms per cubic meter, referring strictly to matter, not including the “mass” energy “elements” (plus they “lament” arguing that the total mass density cannot be calculated because the universe is “expanding”, plus some of them take into account that matter makes up about 27% (???) of the total density of the universe).

So anyway, they argue that our universe is extremely “empty” … Mostly void… Which void keeps expanding… And getting even more “empty” …

But to think that space is empty or full is quite “wrong”.

Space, energy/dark matter, is full of these fluctuations and these energy densities, but it attracts the perception that dark matter is the source of our entire reality. Dark matter is the equal and opposite reaction (minimal, from the point of view of its potential) necessary for the existence of our space.

I have finished the “parenthesis” from the beginning, and I am going to continue the delivery of the real message “today” …

From the point of view of the chronology of my description, the moment came when the energy, the “quanta” passed to the level of “combination”, the one in which the dark matter and the matter known to you began to be structured, that being the true moment of Creation…

Scientists estimate that, for every billion particles that can be designated as antimatter, there is a billion plus one of matter (the required volume of dark matter is huge, being necessary for both the “intimate” structure of our universe and the “participatory” one from the point of view of the structuring of the inter-layers of the multiverses, that is why such a large amount is necessary for its creation and such a small volume for the creation of the actual matter).

Universe “empty” or “full”?!? I couldn’t resist asking the question…

Returning to the “battle between matter and antimatter”, the extra matter particle, asymmetric to the exact balance between each matter versus antimatter particle, the one that “survived”, was enough to form all the matter of the current universe (stars, galaxies, dust, boulders… everything).

But according to scientists, the rest of the matter “canceled out” by interacting with antimatter… Resulting in the thermal “explosion” of existing energy and matter or something else?!?

Or forming dark matter (perhaps that is why scientists call it, so inspired, even intuitively, as “ultra-dense” or “nothing energy”), immensely more than our matter (and/or our antimatter?!?).

The latest discoveries by researchers reveal that the “mirror” arrangement of matter, which I mentioned earlier, is also present at the level of dark matter, this dark matter is a kind of true support of matter…

I could “fill in” now, just to point out that this is where the “correction” by us energy entities come in on the fine “tuning” of the hologram development of the old universe (the First Age along with the second Age of the structure, already, of the universes). I’ll elaborate a bit later…

Well, at this moment of the Big Bang, scientists “tell” us that, at this moment of my presentation, the universe had one second of life.

A universe full of primitive particles that begin to “assemble” into the first atoms. The energy supplement provided by the interaction between matter and antimatter is the “engine” of this process under the conditions of direct interaction with dark matter.

They also tell us that the universe, at this moment, of Creation, is still expanding particularly/incredibly fast and the energy redistribution necessary to fill the expanding volume leads to the effective cooling and the beginning of the assembly process of the first atoms.

As I pointed out earlier, the universe was at its current volume and is cooling simply by the appearance of space-time distortions and, as a result, gravity, as well as by “relative” loss of energy (entropy) and/or by “transfer” energetically in the formation of matter as we know it now (which, therefore, is not a result of Creation but a residue of Creation).

Nevertheless, the universe cools down (transfers energy somewhere, into something) and thus the first atoms of the first known elements appear (after 380,000 years of evolution since the Big Bang, researchers say).

From here, I will continue in the next “session”! Love and understanding!

Merticaru Dorin Nicolae

(Previous)….((Content))…..(Next)

……