To STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The First Step of Energy (Part II)
There would be some
divagations about antimatter, the positron in the case of the
electron, and the antiproton in the case of the proton, but
things would get even more complicated.
In this sense, I recall
only that the positron is effectively antimatter, and homologous
to the electron but less and less being spoken about antiproton
(although in 2006 CERN confirmed that the mass of the antiproton
would be approximately equal to that of the proton) because the
antimatter homologous to the proton is composed of constituent
sub-elements.
It should be noted that
matter and antimatter are a kind of inverse relationship of
matter (the opposite of matter is antimatter, the contact
meaning cancellation with the release of energy) while
everything is related to the duality of matter-wave
(electromagnetism, etc.) is related to "is or is not", the
contact meaning the completion of what is not.
So the "enchantment" of
the combination “with annulment” of matter with antimatter falls
(regarding the "immediately following" period of the Big Bang).
Going on the principle of
achieving equilibrium, it is obvious that a combination of
matter with antimatter leads to the appearance of something and
not to their cancellation with the appearance of energy. A kind
of retrieval of a kind of logical principle like "is or isn’t".
Let's not forget that the
immense release of energy determines the disappearance of the
material or immaterial atom, by "dissolving" it into energy in
the constituent particles. Or there is no energy and
anti-energy.
And, more recently, it has
been shown that there is the so-called "dark matter" present in
everything and everywhere, which gives structure, energy, etc.
even to the void. Then, the black matter is both the "subtle"
constituent of our universe and the inter-universe layers of the
multiverse, being a clear element of completing an "is or isn’t"
ensemble.
In this sense comes Nassim
Haramein’s theory. He departed from one of the basic principles
of physics: for every action, there is an equal and opposite
reaction.
In the Big-Bang model, the
Universe expands but nothing has an opposite reaction
(contraction) to allow it to expand. By analogy with human
existence, he considered that there is a world outside the
experiences of an individual but there is also a world inside
the individual's existence.
Thus, he considered that,
perhaps, the boundary condition of the division of the Universe
is the result of the relationship between the outer and the
inner worlds, and the two are like competing waves, stationary
waves that produce boundaries. And, if that were to indicate
something, which connects all things…
It can only be dark
matter, the only thing that connects absolutely everything.
Nassim doesn’t use the term dark energy, defining everything as
space - space is the one that connects everything, the one that
is everywhere, between galaxies, between stars, between planets,
between cells, between atoms, and even between atomic
structures.
This space which is
99.99999% empty space, the reality in which we live is mostly
empty space, everything that is perceived by us as the material
world is, in fact, empty space, only 0.000001% being "matter" /
in fact, a form of manifestation of energy.
And, here we spend all our
“study” time analyzing this tiny part, forgetting to analyze
what matters is the dark matter (space, after Haramein).
Perhaps this dark matter
is what defines the space as a whole, that which is the source
of all things and the one who connects all things. What we call
void, empty space is full (very, very dense, "infinitely full")
of this dark matter.
The current quantum theory
deduces this by calculating the density of this "void" (of dark
matter). I quote from the most famous work in the field of
gravity: "... the current theory of the quantum field eliminates
through a process of renormalization an energy density of the
vacuum that should be considered infinite, if not eliminated by
this renormalization."
Commenting on the "cryptic
language of physicists", in the current theory of the quantum
field the vacuum must have an extremely high level of density,
for the existing equations to be valid and to take into account
everything that happens at the atomic level.
This was a point of
confirmation that the vacuum is not empty, that space is, in
fact, a fluctuation, the source of the existence of matter and,
therefore, of our reality.
Further, we must return to
the "language of physicists" and see what is normalization.
Well, there are two
types/genres of infinity in physics: an infinitely small number
which is usually neglected and an infinitely large number
(dangerous large - infinitely dangerous) where it is sought to
ignore by various processes (or it is considered that the theory
cannot be applied at that level).
This is how
renormalization occurs, from the "effort" to eliminate the
infinitely large elements.
The basic procedure, in
this case, is to introduce a fundamental constant in the
fragmentation of the number (which, therefore, is no longer
infinite).
In this case, the Length
of Plank (again this Plank?!?) was used, which has the value of
1,616 multiplied by 10 to the power "minus 33" (10-33)
(so an "infinitely small" number - similar to the "infinitely
small" Plank Time used in calculating events from the first
seconds of the Big Bang, Plank Time and Length being the
smallest "created" things in our universe).
To imagine what this
length means, it is the time or distance required for a photon
to travel itself, it is the shortest possible wavelength to be
generated in our Universe.
But, let's not forget that
Plank Length (or time) is a limiting condition, being a
fundamental limit, corresponding to our own
existence/experience. Let's go back! Using the Plank Length
(very close to the famous "phi" number = 1.618) the vacuum was
renormalized.
Thus, the researchers
"took" a cubic centimeter of vacuum and calculated how many
lengths (length fluctuations) Plank is contained in it, to
obtain a finite number for the density of the vacuum (each
Length Plank "having" a very concrete mass of 10 at power -5
grams - 10-5g).
Thus, the fundamental
density of a cubic centimeter of vacuum turned out to be 10 at
the power of 93 grams per cubic centimeter (1093g/cm).
I don't know if you
realize how huge this number is?!? It was calculated that if we
took everything visible in our Universe (billions of galaxies,
with billions of stars each) and squeezed it into a cubic
centimeter, we still could not reach the energy density of the
vacuum. From the calculations of physicists, the universe
"weighs" is 10 to the power 55 grams (1055g).
So to think that space is
empty is incorrect. Space, the dark matter, is full of these
fluctuations and these energy densities, it’s the source of our
whole reality. The dark matter is the equal and opposite
reaction (infinitesimal, in terms of its potential) necessary
for the existence of our space.
And there is even a
division of this density of vacuum (dark matter). If you think
of our reality not as objects in space but as divisions of
space, patterns will be discovered.
Haramein, along with
Elisabeth Rauscher and Michael Hyson, described a law of this
division in a graph with two axes. If one represents the energy
density and the other radius on one axis, the graph obtained
will represent the energy measured in Hz (Hertz) on one axis and
the radius on the other axis. In this graph we will represent
all the perceptible objects in our universe and solving the
equations, based on the existing data for the approximation of
the radius of our universe and the approximation of the energy
level, we obtain a "points" graph.
When analyzing the
"result", which is in the form of a linear progression, the size
and quantity of matter in the Universe, you know that our
Universe respects the conditions of existence and manifestation
of a black hole.
Our universe is far too
dense for anything to escape from it except gravitons. Moreover,
it turns out that the dark matter (the void) is the source of
the division of our universe, a division that respects "very
precise rules".
And, this result is also
verified "at the other end of the dimensional scale", at the
level of the atomic world. Crossing the "boundaries" of the
quantum world, moving from relativistic equations to quantum
equations, you get the same things. Descending even to the Plank
Length, the singularity achieves the same thing.
Thus it turns out that
there is structure, that there is order, that the dark matter is
divided according to very precise, predictable rules (easily
described by the number of "phi", mentioned above, and the
Fibonacci series). But about all this a little later (I think
you get so much "physics on bread", be it something more
unconventional)!
Therefore, the time has
come when the quants have moved to the next level of
"combination", the one in which they began to structure the dark
matter and the matter known to us, that being the true moment of
Creation.
It is estimated that for
every billion particles designated as antimatter, there was a
billion-plus one of matter (the required volume of dark matter
is huge, being necessary both for the "intimate" structure of
our universe and the structure of the multiverse inter-layers,
therefore such a large quantity is required for its creation and
such a small volume for the creation of the material itself).
The extra particle of
matter that "survived" was enough to form all the matter in the
current universe (stars, galaxies, dust, boulders ...
everything). But the rest of the matter was "canceled out" with
the antimatter forming the dark matter (maybe that's why it's
called by the scientists, so inspired or intuitive, as the
"energy of nothing"), a billion times more than our matter
(and/or our antimatter?!?).
The latest findings of the
researchers show that the "mirror" arrangement of matter, which
I mentioned earlier, is also present at the level of the dark
matter, this dark matter constituting itself as true support of
the matter.
Returning to the "Big
Bang", at this point, scientists "tell us" that, at this point
in my exposition, the life of the universe had a second.
The universe was full of
primitive particles that are beginning to "assemble" into the
first atoms. The energy supplement provided by the interaction
between matter and antimatter is the "engine" of this process
under the conditions of direct interaction with dark matter.
Scientists tell us that
the universe, at this moment, of Creation, is still expanding
extremely/ incredibly fast, and the energy redistribution
required to fill the expanding volume leads to effective cooling
and the process of assembling the first atoms.
In my and others' opinion,
the universe had its current volume and is simply cooled by the
appearance of space-time distortions and, as a result, gravity
as well as by loss of energy (entropy) and/ or energy transfer
in the formation of matter as we know it now (which, thus, is
not a result of Creation but a residue of Creation).
In any case, the universe
cools down (it transfers energy somewhere, into something), and
thus, the first atoms of the first known elements appear (after
380,000 years of evolution, the researchers say).
The first one being formed
is hydrogen - H, the atomic number "1" - atomic mass 1,008 (and
then it is assumed that, in the next three minutes of the
existence of the universe, helium - He, the atomic number "2" -
4,003 appears, then lithium - Li, the atomic number "3" - 6,941,
by combining H or by "adding" to what existed - the atomic
number representing the number of protons in the atomic nucleus,
the one that defines the chemical element). By fusion or simple
energy accumulation, still huge in those days.
As a kind of parenthesis,
many "weird", or rarely accredited researchers and many
"angels"/ "spirits" or whatever you want to call them, claim
that the Divine Power has doubted righteousness, clarity, and so
on, of something and, then was forced (by Himself, through
Himself and for Himself) to divide (to break the balance of
"superpower") in the part without contradictions (stable,
governing, supporting, etc.) represented by the dark matter and
the part full of contradictions that formed the present,
material universe, the one known/perceived by us (even though we
always forget that it is in an indissoluble unit with dark
matter).
This is an energetic part
that attracted destabilization, as a kind of concept impossible
to evaluate by human knowledge and, to allow closing the
contradictions, it was delimited by creating our universe for
the evolution of that part and restoring balance.
Following these
considerations, it is very likely that each universe is a kind
of evolutionary variant for the energetic manifestations that
need evolution, that can and will close the contradictions
through knowledge, evolution, living.
Maybe it’s bedtime stories
for children or vigilant spirits of materialists and worshipers,
maybe they're not. It seems to me too great the procedural
similarity in both cases and the distinction of the
materialistic ambitions to hold rather forced explanations like
(Plank–“tranc”) or worshipful (God–“zbang”).
Everything we have
described so far is far too far from a random evolution,
everything is far too connected, fluent, that we can eliminate
the external intervention, certainly divine. I will return to
this topic!
At this moment, from the
creation of the first atoms, the universe didn’t look as far
away as we know it. He looked like a milky soup (“literally”) of
atoms and electrons.
There followed a process
of continuous "atomization" of matter, its aggregation into
atoms. An aggregation that is preserved in the matter of the
present universe and which offers a real paradox to scientists.
This paradox is
represented by the fact that, at the atomic and subatomic
levels, the initial disorder, the first second of the life of
the universe (the Brownian movement) is maintained, but at the
perceptible level ("macro") of matter, everything is so neat and
perfect.
The string theory, which
is also based on Theodore Kaluza's research, sets in order this
little chaos (and the foundations of quantum physics) even
though, for this, a "sum" of 10 existential universes is
required. But, about that, later!
Also at this point, in my
opinion (and that of others), there was a concrete distortion of
the space-time known as "gravity" manifested itself, favoring
the aggregation processes.
As the universe cooled
("investing" energy in the atoms known to us today), the
favorable conditions for absorption/attraction of the free
"content" of electrons appeared, a process that lasted 380,000
years, according to scientists. until the Universe became
transparent, relatively as we know it now (but composed only and
only of H (in proportion of 99.999999%), He, and Li).
Now gravity is beginning
to manifest itself in the values and laws known to us today. The
"resident" energies (thermally manifested as microwaves) of the
processes were discovered in 1964 by Arno Penzias and Robert
Wilson and subsequently confirmed by the COBE (COsmic Background
Explorer) probe and the WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy)
probe. - microwave anisotropy probe), making an image called
"Face of God" (digitally improved since 2009 by Plank
satellite).
This image shows that the
universe is not "continuous" in terms of the distribution of
matter, there are areas of its condensation, where stars,
galaxies, etc. will appear, and areas, where there is nothing
and only "empty space"/ void (dark matter), will appear.
And, it was precisely
these differences of distribution that allowed the
"condensations" of matter to "attract" the current form of the
universe (through the action of the gravitational waves,
possibly its distortions). More than that, this image shows us
that the universe, at 380,000 years old, as the researchers say,
was as it is now, but more "foggy". Let's go back!
This term, "foggy", I used
because the matter was distributed in huge clouds of H, He, and
Li, following a period of another 200 million years until the
gases from these clouds will be "attracted" (so there was
gravity as a result of space-time distortion).
At the end of this period,
the first stars begin to light up and turn the universe into
huge "fireworks" (or "... It was as if the lights of the
Christmas tree were on").
It took a long time and,
one billion years after the Big Bang, the first galaxies formed,
a process that continued for the next 8 billion years. Then,
almost 5 billion years ago, in a quiet corner of a galaxy (Milky
Way) the Sun shines. So, 9 billion years after the "Big Bang",
our small solar system begins to take shape.
There is some certainty
that, during this 8 billion year interval, there would have been
another "Solar" star that completed its evolutionary cycle and
exploded as a supernova, the current Sun being considered to be
at least of the second generation, consisting of the remains of
the first star in the solar system area. But we will give some
details a little later.
However, the researchers
omit very important things, from my point of view. All
"scholars" know that "heavier" atomic elements (heavier than H,
He, and Li) are formed under certain conditions of pressure,
temperature, etc. that can only be found inside the stars.
It requires a massive
energized environment, as presented above, with immense
pressures that allow the existence of free protons and
"crushing" until the atomic nuclei are combined to form
"heavier" chemical elements (Be, the atomic number "4" - atomic
mass 9.012, B 5 - 10.61, C 6 - 12.01, N 7 - 14.01, O 8 - 16.00,
etc., also found at the atomic mass level, H about 1, He approx.
4, Li approx 7, Be approx 9, B approx 11, C approx 12, N approx
14, O approx 16, etc).
But how could an atomic
structure "superior" to hydrogen (H) be achieved? Where does the
support for the claims of scientists about the "creation" of
helium (He) and lithium (Li) come from?
There are some
"clarifications" regarding the all-presence of a true energy
calamity of the primordial universe, which is, in fact, energy,
plasma (which can take over protons). Then, the "combination" of
matter with antimatter would have attracted the "existence" of
even more energy. He and Li, maybe it was only H.
The basic idea would be
that there was only hydrogen, the most present substance in the
universe and at this time it began to aggregate, condense and
form the first stars (large condensations of such gases).
So, where a star appeared
from the cloud condensations of H, He, and Li (even so), there
should be nothing around, except, at most, remnants of these
"unattracted" clouds still from that star. So stars and so on,
"primary" gas clouds and so on and that’s it.
Where are the planets,
boulders, comets then?!? A possible explanation would be
represented by the evolution of a star before the existing one,
its explosion (because otherwise the matter with "higher" atomic
masses would not be expelled) being the cause of the existence
of matter from which planets will subsequently form, and others.
Or was there a divine manifestation that thought of all?!?
But, in essence, this is
why it is considered that our Sun would be at least of the
second generation, having both the hydrogen necessary for its
ignition and the heavy matter that constitutes the planets,
asteroids, the Oort cloud, etc.
(Processing Post January 30, 2015/ 2017/ 2020 dorinm.ro and blog on wordpress)
Dorin, Merticaru