STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
How
it Works... Our "Body" (8).
Translation Draft
I'm going to continue yesterday's theme...
I'm going to continue yesterday's theme...
So,
many researchers have addressed at length the problem of the
existence of the biological field and its interference with
experimentally induced magnetic and electric fields (and this is
not to demonstrate any interaction with the multitude of fields
to which we are subjected daily in terms of technology - radio
waves, cell phones, etc. - but focused on the theme of
"information of life"). Thus, starting from the idea that the
movement of electrons generates electromagnetic fields, and the
functioning of living matter (and not only) means nothing more
than a continuous transfer of electrons, they discovered as
implicit the existence of a magnetic field at the level of all
living structures.
The biological field would be related to the structural asymmetry of protein macromolecules. This structural asymmetry would in turn generate an electrical and magnetic asymmetry and, very importantly, as a matter of view, would constitute the very cause of the reactivity of living structures. Like any energy field, the biofield propagates in the form of waves, hence the possibility that the transfer of energy and information required by the complexity of biochemical reactions in cells is carried out through the biofield, the nervous influx having only the role of triggering, initiating the biochemical processes necessary for life.
We have such to do with a real ocean of signals, information. "Speaking" figuratively, it can be said that we float in a permanent bath of signals. We continuously emit and receive signals through which we integrate into the great order of life. Thanks to these signals we integrate and are influenced by everything that happens in the "global" biofield and we influence at the same time and communicate with all that is alive.
Consequently, the initial appearance and organization of cells in a universe of signals without the ability to receive them. to perceive them, would be biological nonsense. It is yet another argument that requires the idea, which we have developed in previous posts, that at all levels of organization of life, whether or not we know a nervous structure (a specialized structure), the ability to receive information from the environment, to process it and to issue feedback, appropriate behavior is present.
If life means the exchange of information and energy with the environment, if the structure of a living organism reflects the environmental conditions in which it was formed, however we would like to interpret life, as an expression of hazard (ultimately also produced by the environment) or as an expression of the laws imposed by evolution, the possibility to perceive the signals from the space surrounding it and to emit signals in turn appears as obvious.
We have to deal with biocommunication, in the true sense of the term. As I pointed out, if we accept this idea practically imposed by a lot of processes, which cannot be attributed to a description other than "biocommunication", the phenomena described can find a scientific explanation, without being ignored only because they cannot be explained and abandoned to the so much speculated domain of the supernatural. Experiments have been carried out that suggest the existence of language between cells, i.e. their ability to transmit and receive signals informing them of their condition. I'm reminded here of the experiment with the wall of the maple and the glass wall that I mentioned in previous posts. For those who have not gone through that material I will give some details...
We have two identical cultures of living cells separated by a wall. If we affect, for example virally, one of the colonies, in the case of their separation by a glass wall (a good insulator) there is no communication between the colonies. If we replace the glass wall with a quantum wall, which allows biocommunication, it is found that the control group begins to present the same "problem" as the virally infected group. Experience gives the same result to the use of different toxic substances.
Since there is no connection between the two colonies through a living structure, it is assumed that the phenomenon would occur by transmitting signals carrying pathological information through the quartz wall (the bottle has a rigid molecular structure, insulating in our case, whereas quartz is a very good transmitter of electromagnetic waves). The message appears to be encoded and transmitted by electromagnetic radiation (the researchers even identify that the communication waves would have a wavelength that would be in the ultraviolet spectrum - a conclusion confirmed by other researchers).
Important here is the fact that in this case the cells were not integrated into an organism and, consequently, there were no nerve links between them, allowing them to capture and decode the information. Despite this communication has occurred, which provides a basis, it is true, only as an observation without demonstration, in understanding another phenomenon represented by the ability of plants to react to our thoughts and intentions, to our unconscious "ability" to integrate through perception to the mass "feelings" of a human gathering (such as the euphoria encountered in a stadium , demonstrations, etc.). All this supports the ability of all living cells to receive and decode information-carrying signals from outside them, in a different way than that of the nervous system.
And, the key to all the seemingly strange phenomena in this seemingly strange behavior of the living world lies in our inability to objectify and reproduce them at will, so as to meet the criteria raised by science to attest to the reality of this phenomenon... Although the evidence and practices (I mean here only and only the millions of practitioners of alpha, teta, etc.) therapies in this regard are increasingly obvious... Why can't they be fully objectified with the equipment at our disposal? The explanation lies in the fact that the means of energy exploration currently used can collect from our body only "result" signals of electrical activity (possibly, potential differences).
Thus, we have an electroencephalograph (with which we record brain biocurrents), an electrocardiograph (through which we collect information about the electrical signals emitted by the heart during operation), all biochemical reactions in a living organism meaning exchange of ions, as a last expression of electricity. There are magnetic resonance devices, but of course they are also the result of the same activity.
All the information we receive through the five senses is encoded at the receptor level in electrical signals. They are transmitted through the nerve pathways of the brain, which decodes them and "knows" the signal/message transmitted. Light, sound waves, taste, smell, pain, heat, cold, the most tender touches reach the brain only in the prosaic form of electrical signals. In turn, the brain emits the information represented by conduct, thoughts, feelings, attitudes, movements, also in the form of electrical signals.
But, can we reduce all our energy to electricity? If so, then knowing the parameters of this energy that we can measure with electronic means should logically cause the body to function by "applications" of electric currents that determine the operation "at will". This was done for the heart, which can work with cardiostimulators implanted in the body, with the removal of tremors from Parkinson's with stimulators implanted in the brain. But let us not rush into the optimism that results from these successes. I will not mention here the successes of the new medicine therapies (especially alpha and teta therapies) that have completely eliminated the cause that "requires" those peacemakers.
I will be materialistic and i will just point out that we have only brought an electrical impulse from a technical source to a well-known frequency and nothing more (just an adjustment and, by no means a correction - which, even after all, can still be considered to be a "prolonged" external intervention by its materialization in a device). Could we do the same with the brain, based only on the brain parameters we record on an encephalogram?
Do we distinguish a trace of thought, a glimpse of feeling in the lines that machines point to us as the activity of our brain? Can we accept the image of a man working connected to such "electric correctors" before the image of a healthy man? Obviously, none of this (or just crushing despair)... I for one can not admit the image of my mother connected to life support (concrete to the artificial lung) but only her image as healthy, breathing on her own...
And then there are two possibilities for interpretation: either we admit that bioelectricity is an epiphenomenon, a side effect of energy in living structures, and we only record this aspect, or we admit that apart from bioelectric energy there is another energy, which we do not yet know (or do not want to recognise) by not being able to objectify it by the means at our disposal now (or to which we have general access) , but that will become known "tomorrow". Regardless of how we consider it, something in the operation of the vi remains still unknown (or unrecognized), unrecorded by the machines. Hence distrust, skepticism, denial of phenomena that cannot be understood, such as telepathy, etc.
Unable to be objectified, they are not recognized by the laws by which they are carried out, not knowing these laws we cannot deliberately reproduce them. And, here's how neither of the two criteria required by science to admit a phenomenon are met. But is it ?!? The practice of new medicine and many other similar therapies, the phenomena of "personal development", psychological "coordinations" and other interventions that help the individual to control himself and thus to heal himself do not come as a demonstration, as a success in this regard!?! Hmmm, let's give Caesar the materialistic, what's Caesar's. What do we have to do? Force phenomena to fit into a narrow space or science to expand its limits? Since we cannot act upon them, life exists regardless of our will, our egos.
That's enough for today, but a good post came out, no matter how tired I am... I've spent a little more and better than I expected. Me at the prom and my mom at the hospital... Strange manifestation of the vi in my immediate "approach". But what are you going to do to him?!? I deserve something other than work and work again. Ah, and a message for last night/this morning: "AB C D"... And, one for all of you, readers of these lines (before
I "nani-nani"): Love, Gratitude and Understanding!!!
The biological field would be related to the structural asymmetry of protein macromolecules. This structural asymmetry would in turn generate an electrical and magnetic asymmetry and, very importantly, as a matter of view, would constitute the very cause of the reactivity of living structures. Like any energy field, the biofield propagates in the form of waves, hence the possibility that the transfer of energy and information required by the complexity of biochemical reactions in cells is carried out through the biofield, the nervous influx having only the role of triggering, initiating the biochemical processes necessary for life.
We have such to do with a real ocean of signals, information. "Speaking" figuratively, it can be said that we float in a permanent bath of signals. We continuously emit and receive signals through which we integrate into the great order of life. Thanks to these signals we integrate and are influenced by everything that happens in the "global" biofield and we influence at the same time and communicate with all that is alive.
Consequently, the initial appearance and organization of cells in a universe of signals without the ability to receive them. to perceive them, would be biological nonsense. It is yet another argument that requires the idea, which we have developed in previous posts, that at all levels of organization of life, whether or not we know a nervous structure (a specialized structure), the ability to receive information from the environment, to process it and to issue feedback, appropriate behavior is present.
If life means the exchange of information and energy with the environment, if the structure of a living organism reflects the environmental conditions in which it was formed, however we would like to interpret life, as an expression of hazard (ultimately also produced by the environment) or as an expression of the laws imposed by evolution, the possibility to perceive the signals from the space surrounding it and to emit signals in turn appears as obvious.
We have to deal with biocommunication, in the true sense of the term. As I pointed out, if we accept this idea practically imposed by a lot of processes, which cannot be attributed to a description other than "biocommunication", the phenomena described can find a scientific explanation, without being ignored only because they cannot be explained and abandoned to the so much speculated domain of the supernatural. Experiments have been carried out that suggest the existence of language between cells, i.e. their ability to transmit and receive signals informing them of their condition. I'm reminded here of the experiment with the wall of the maple and the glass wall that I mentioned in previous posts. For those who have not gone through that material I will give some details...
We have two identical cultures of living cells separated by a wall. If we affect, for example virally, one of the colonies, in the case of their separation by a glass wall (a good insulator) there is no communication between the colonies. If we replace the glass wall with a quantum wall, which allows biocommunication, it is found that the control group begins to present the same "problem" as the virally infected group. Experience gives the same result to the use of different toxic substances.
Since there is no connection between the two colonies through a living structure, it is assumed that the phenomenon would occur by transmitting signals carrying pathological information through the quartz wall (the bottle has a rigid molecular structure, insulating in our case, whereas quartz is a very good transmitter of electromagnetic waves). The message appears to be encoded and transmitted by electromagnetic radiation (the researchers even identify that the communication waves would have a wavelength that would be in the ultraviolet spectrum - a conclusion confirmed by other researchers).
Important here is the fact that in this case the cells were not integrated into an organism and, consequently, there were no nerve links between them, allowing them to capture and decode the information. Despite this communication has occurred, which provides a basis, it is true, only as an observation without demonstration, in understanding another phenomenon represented by the ability of plants to react to our thoughts and intentions, to our unconscious "ability" to integrate through perception to the mass "feelings" of a human gathering (such as the euphoria encountered in a stadium , demonstrations, etc.). All this supports the ability of all living cells to receive and decode information-carrying signals from outside them, in a different way than that of the nervous system.
And, the key to all the seemingly strange phenomena in this seemingly strange behavior of the living world lies in our inability to objectify and reproduce them at will, so as to meet the criteria raised by science to attest to the reality of this phenomenon... Although the evidence and practices (I mean here only and only the millions of practitioners of alpha, teta, etc.) therapies in this regard are increasingly obvious... Why can't they be fully objectified with the equipment at our disposal? The explanation lies in the fact that the means of energy exploration currently used can collect from our body only "result" signals of electrical activity (possibly, potential differences).
Thus, we have an electroencephalograph (with which we record brain biocurrents), an electrocardiograph (through which we collect information about the electrical signals emitted by the heart during operation), all biochemical reactions in a living organism meaning exchange of ions, as a last expression of electricity. There are magnetic resonance devices, but of course they are also the result of the same activity.
All the information we receive through the five senses is encoded at the receptor level in electrical signals. They are transmitted through the nerve pathways of the brain, which decodes them and "knows" the signal/message transmitted. Light, sound waves, taste, smell, pain, heat, cold, the most tender touches reach the brain only in the prosaic form of electrical signals. In turn, the brain emits the information represented by conduct, thoughts, feelings, attitudes, movements, also in the form of electrical signals.
But, can we reduce all our energy to electricity? If so, then knowing the parameters of this energy that we can measure with electronic means should logically cause the body to function by "applications" of electric currents that determine the operation "at will". This was done for the heart, which can work with cardiostimulators implanted in the body, with the removal of tremors from Parkinson's with stimulators implanted in the brain. But let us not rush into the optimism that results from these successes. I will not mention here the successes of the new medicine therapies (especially alpha and teta therapies) that have completely eliminated the cause that "requires" those peacemakers.
I will be materialistic and i will just point out that we have only brought an electrical impulse from a technical source to a well-known frequency and nothing more (just an adjustment and, by no means a correction - which, even after all, can still be considered to be a "prolonged" external intervention by its materialization in a device). Could we do the same with the brain, based only on the brain parameters we record on an encephalogram?
Do we distinguish a trace of thought, a glimpse of feeling in the lines that machines point to us as the activity of our brain? Can we accept the image of a man working connected to such "electric correctors" before the image of a healthy man? Obviously, none of this (or just crushing despair)... I for one can not admit the image of my mother connected to life support (concrete to the artificial lung) but only her image as healthy, breathing on her own...
And then there are two possibilities for interpretation: either we admit that bioelectricity is an epiphenomenon, a side effect of energy in living structures, and we only record this aspect, or we admit that apart from bioelectric energy there is another energy, which we do not yet know (or do not want to recognise) by not being able to objectify it by the means at our disposal now (or to which we have general access) , but that will become known "tomorrow". Regardless of how we consider it, something in the operation of the vi remains still unknown (or unrecognized), unrecorded by the machines. Hence distrust, skepticism, denial of phenomena that cannot be understood, such as telepathy, etc.
Unable to be objectified, they are not recognized by the laws by which they are carried out, not knowing these laws we cannot deliberately reproduce them. And, here's how neither of the two criteria required by science to admit a phenomenon are met. But is it ?!? The practice of new medicine and many other similar therapies, the phenomena of "personal development", psychological "coordinations" and other interventions that help the individual to control himself and thus to heal himself do not come as a demonstration, as a success in this regard!?! Hmmm, let's give Caesar the materialistic, what's Caesar's. What do we have to do? Force phenomena to fit into a narrow space or science to expand its limits? Since we cannot act upon them, life exists regardless of our will, our egos.
That's enough for today, but a good post came out, no matter how tired I am... I've spent a little more and better than I expected. Me at the prom and my mom at the hospital... Strange manifestation of the vi in my immediate "approach". But what are you going to do to him?!? I deserve something other than work and work again. Ah, and a message for last night/this morning: "AB C D"... And, one for all of you, readers of these lines (before
I "nani-nani"): Love, Gratitude and Understanding!!!
Dorin, Merticaru