STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
How
it Works... Our "Soul" (5).
Translation Draft
"Christ has risen!" is our "greeting" of this day (and in many days to come)! "True!" is the confirmation of the greetings. Many of us have taken the Light that confirms our faith in God and in our communion with Him, but also in the continuity of our existence and after physical death... And not necessarily faith in the church that has a doctrinal and ritual foundation in this event.
"Christ has risen!" is our "greeting" of this day (and in many days to come)! "True!" is the confirmation of the greetings. Many of us have taken the Light that confirms our faith in God and in our communion with Him, but also in the continuity of our existence and after physical death... And not necessarily faith in the church that has a doctrinal and ritual foundation in this event.
But
last but not least, we confirm the unconscious perception of the
selfless purpose of Jesus Christ who sacrificed himself for us,
of his Resurrection in keeping our salvation, through which we
passed from death to life. If Christ had not died and risen for
us, vain would be our faith, hope, and life, for without His
death and Resurrection, the "sin" of the lack of Light, of the
Knowledge of the Divine, and the Eternal within us cannot be
overcome.
Resurrection is not a return to an improved bodily life, but is the promise made by Jesus during His life that every person who knew Christ will participate in divine life. Through the Resurrection of Christ and the work of the grace of the Holy Ghost in the world the consequences of a simple and unique material life are objectively overcome, even if, from the point of view of an unaltruistic church, which only uses the divine within us, signalled by Jesus himself, general salvation becomes working when each man tries to subjectively acquire these fruits.
Man, as well as the whole creation of God, is shared by the gifts of the Resurrection of our Savior Jesus Christ, because through the work of grace in the world, the body is no longer dark, opaque, but is overwhelmed by the spirit, Enlightened, being the culmination of holiness that anticipates the state of the bodies at the resurrection of the public.
We are tempted to talk less about these events after the Enlightened Week passes, but the words "Christ has risen!", which a Christian addresses to another Christian, for a period of forty days, from the Resurrection to the Ascension of the Lord, are not just a greeting, or mere words without content, with which a known, a congregation, an official guest, or a mere person is greeted. , but they are a confession of faith, our hope and our hope that the resurrection exists. The Light of Christ's Resurrection is given to us selflessly, free of charge, but we must strive to appropriate it, because it entrusts us that the meaning of our life, the guarantee of future life, is in the Resurrection of the Savior and in the work of the Holy Ghost, which transforms our opaque bodies into transparent bodies, bright spiritual bodies, bodies full of the Holy Spirit.
"Death was consumed by the death of the deathless, who with death pre-death had ruined it. Therefore, the baptized child sinks three times into the water of Christendom, as a sign of fellowship with the three days spent by the Lord in the tomb, thus freeing himself from the eternal mortality of the fallen man, and will pass only through the fleshly death, through which the Lord, and the Mother of the Lord, and the Holy Apostles and all those who have committed themselves in Christ , to then taste, together with them, the resurrection" are elements that complement our creed... and the "description" of my perceptions related to this event, before moving on to continuing those previously posted (about the "dialogue" between science and religion)...
Starting from Jesus, the "celebrated" these days, I cannot help but point out that the religions that have set themselves an altruistic purpose from the beginning come out of the temples. In this selfless character lay the civilizing role of religion for many peoples. It must be said, however, in order to understand some discordance sins in the interpretation of their doctrines, with all the consequences that have resulted from it (arguments, anathemas, repressions, schisms, sects, etc.) that religions keep within them esoteric elements accessible only to the clergy, and others wrongly translated according to their original form. And not always their fault.
Heraclit, quoted by Schure, tells us that the Egyptian priests had three ways of expressing an idea: 1. clear and simple, 2. symbolic and figurative and 3. sacred and hieroglyphic. The same word made sense 1. own, 2. figuratively, 3. transcendental, in other words, 1. clearly, 2. significant and 3. hidden. It is understood that the initiates had the key to this cipher.
And, this way of transmitting everything is found everywhere, in the whole human being, at least of the times then (times "continued" dogmatically to the present day), but it is also the main cause of different interpretations, which have taken many of us away from the Light.
In many ways the truth has been permanently "choked" by dogmas, by a "placement outside of us of truth", especially those of the "believe and not research" type, typical, especially, of the West. But for the sages of the Orient, the truth about us and the universe is not outside but within us, as Jesus pointed out to us with his famous "I will be in every one of you". The West has wanted to explain the world by projecting itself into the phenomena and objects of our external reality while the East has sought the explanation of the world within our soul, in the depths of the spirit, somewhere in the interface of emotion-intellect, in the space of experiences that reveals itself only to the one who by initiation learns to know the seed of knowledge, to illuminate the abyss where its essential being hides, expression of the absolute Truth.
Jesus didn't enlighten us the same way?!? The East was obsessed with the Absolute, Jesus gave it to us... And nothing that the Absolute assumes has escaped its attention: Life, Death, Time, Eternity, the Universe and Man. But He just remained in our hearts and in our Resurrection. But the East created a science for everyone and extracted the immediate practical consequence. This knowledge transformed into severely directed action, placed under the prohibition of disclosure, has meant a huge advantage over the dogmas of Western churches but also over the exoteric and speculative sciences that have found their way to concrete and never entirely.
They didn't reach the sideral heights with cosmic ships, but they surely touched them with spirit, they didn't t tall for partial truths, but for the total. Eastern spirituality cannot be judged by the level of today's technical civilization because it has not interested them (in clear contradiction with Western spirituality which seems particularly attentive to anything that can "violate" their dogmas). But we could say that everything we've accomplished through technique, they've far outdone by spirit. And there is matter and spirit, as we see. But we need both, and we can't rule one out without fragmenting our being and isolating it from the Source, breaking it from ourselves.
If we try to historically order the two types of knowledge we see that, through ancient Greece, the tradition of esoteric sciences is descending the curve of evolution. It continues with a small scale through neoplatonics, Gnostics and, closer to us, through some closed societies and some branded representation of our time. The area where priestly science had a strong influence on ancient civilization was ancient Egypt. The pharaohs themselves were initiates, and the civilization that created a major monumental art lasted several thousand years.
With Greece, science takes on an open character, enriches itself with the information of experience, observation, and, through Aristotle, begins the foundation of science. Starting from initiatory symbolic needs comes to the development of mathematics, especially geometry. Pythagoras, Tales, Euclid, Archimedes, Democritus, Heraclit, etc., have since remained reference names in the history of human thought. From the initiatory philosophy comes a pluralism of philosophical systems that still make the greatness of the old Elade today. Without this openness to knowledge of all, the world would probably have remained to archaic forms, perhaps better spiritually, but without all that civilization meant.
But, lest they forget, the Greeks created the great culture of the world that reached us, because they recorded what they "gathered", living in symbiosis with the sea, through which they constantly made contact with other worlds, with other ways of thinking, of civilization, accumulating and understanding the elements with which they made contact.
Contact with the civilization of ancient Egypt was certainly the most fruitful, say the historical sources. They came to the consciousness of human universality and imagined his ideal prototype. Hence the cultivation of the classical ideal, the perfection of the models created in art. This is how ancient Greece remained the reference model in many of its spiritual manifestations. In the museums of Rome you can see sculptures of gods and goddesses that say "Roman copy of the Greek original". All the gods of Rome are the gods of Greece, baptized with Roman names. But an empire sprawling over so many peoples, like the Roman one, could not have also had the cult for universality as the Greeks had. And the force of their spirit has left us to this day Roman Law. With the Renaissance they would match the painted image, the Greeks who reached their peak in the carved one. And so, in the Louvre, we also admire Venus of Milo and the Mona Lisa. The sublime of two past worlds, the insignia of genius fed on Earth.
But to return to the limits of religion... Religions did not extract their foundations from the physics and chemistry of this world but from another knowledge of cosmic laws, which began with initiates, prophecies, evolved and enlightened spirits. At least initially, their doctrine promoted moral values that have universal value. Unable to devoid of any moral code, Christianity, Islamism, Brahmanism, etc., moral codes elaborated on philosophical, rational bases, all are almost identical. It differs only in elements related to the specificity of the crops from which they come. That's why they played law and science in times without law and without science. In this consisted primarily of their civilizing role, of course when they did not impose themselves with the sword of another civilization, as happened, disturbingly, throughout the earth...
One question arises: given the source of knowledge of religions, they possess a complete knowledge?!? Definitely not. Even in the richest experiences of "enlightenment" only fragments are obtained in relation more to the horizon of knowledge and concerns of the person concerned. Word play is also dependent on the same factors. That's why there are so many different visions. The common elements are those that allow the development of a model, but never completely. Religions, like science, ultimately bear a human signature. We want to describe, for example, a multi-store house that we only see from the inside. This is the universe. We will never get to know him in his entirety and we will always describe the space in which we are imprisoned.
Hence the perceptible opposition between science and religion, if it exists... Both are concerns of the human spirit. Both have as their object knowledge and both have as their purpose man. Religion is concerned with its invisible dimension, science with its concrete, visible one. We have arguments today, as we have seen, that advocate for the visible and the invisible. Quantum physics describes a universe that transcends its possibility of rendering through the rational concepts with which we have been accustomed in the three-dimensional vision through stretching and substance and a multidimensional conditioning by a reality that transcends consciousness. Moreover, the legacies inferred from the structure of this universe send us, as we have seen, to concepts formulated by esoteric and religious thinking. There is, therefore, a multidimensional conditioning by a reality that transcends consciousness.
Religions have dealt with the world of the abyss within us, our inner side. Science has taken care of the outside. And there's inside and out, both of which are new. For our unit we need both sides. Religion is more aimed at the heart, more about the brain's science. And we have to have heart and brain. One dealt with the Sacred, the other the Profan. And man now needs more than ever, in the despair with which he seeks himself without finding himself, the uplifting of consciousness to the saving dimension of the Sacred.
We live in a period of great historical turmoil, of aggression manifested at all levels (war, murder, legal oppression, etc.) and thus of a spiritual fall. The picture of the world viewed in retrospect fully confirms it. If in the past, however, a conflict had consequences that history was recovering, now history can stop instead, at best. Let us give history a chance, listening to the reason of the Sacred within us, which we have long forgotten to listen to (starting from the little one among us and finishing, especially, with our leaders). Now, after years of evolution of knowledge, we are forced to intervene in the philosophical and historical dispute "Platon-Aristotle". The world of Plato's ideas is only that of the invisible dimension in which are the archetypes of the concrete world. Aristotle is the philosopher of the visible, concrete world that modern sciences have dealt with.
And there's up and down, and visible and invisible, and Plato and Aristotle. Now, after these thousands of years of questions and searches, we have concrete, tangible arguments to issue a pertinent answer through a synthesis of the two types of knowledge in order to find a way out of perhaps the worst moral crisis that man has ever experienced. Much worse than when the Unknown sent us to save his great prophets, to bring us the Light...
Between the gesture of the Resurrection of Jesus with the Light brought to and for us and the "crucifixion" of it that we choose. Let's be enlightened or crucified?!? or... Who will be the prophet of our time?
I'm going to stop now... But I will continue with possible answers for us starting with tomorrow's post...
Christ has risen! Love, Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Resurrection is not a return to an improved bodily life, but is the promise made by Jesus during His life that every person who knew Christ will participate in divine life. Through the Resurrection of Christ and the work of the grace of the Holy Ghost in the world the consequences of a simple and unique material life are objectively overcome, even if, from the point of view of an unaltruistic church, which only uses the divine within us, signalled by Jesus himself, general salvation becomes working when each man tries to subjectively acquire these fruits.
Man, as well as the whole creation of God, is shared by the gifts of the Resurrection of our Savior Jesus Christ, because through the work of grace in the world, the body is no longer dark, opaque, but is overwhelmed by the spirit, Enlightened, being the culmination of holiness that anticipates the state of the bodies at the resurrection of the public.
We are tempted to talk less about these events after the Enlightened Week passes, but the words "Christ has risen!", which a Christian addresses to another Christian, for a period of forty days, from the Resurrection to the Ascension of the Lord, are not just a greeting, or mere words without content, with which a known, a congregation, an official guest, or a mere person is greeted. , but they are a confession of faith, our hope and our hope that the resurrection exists. The Light of Christ's Resurrection is given to us selflessly, free of charge, but we must strive to appropriate it, because it entrusts us that the meaning of our life, the guarantee of future life, is in the Resurrection of the Savior and in the work of the Holy Ghost, which transforms our opaque bodies into transparent bodies, bright spiritual bodies, bodies full of the Holy Spirit.
"Death was consumed by the death of the deathless, who with death pre-death had ruined it. Therefore, the baptized child sinks three times into the water of Christendom, as a sign of fellowship with the three days spent by the Lord in the tomb, thus freeing himself from the eternal mortality of the fallen man, and will pass only through the fleshly death, through which the Lord, and the Mother of the Lord, and the Holy Apostles and all those who have committed themselves in Christ , to then taste, together with them, the resurrection" are elements that complement our creed... and the "description" of my perceptions related to this event, before moving on to continuing those previously posted (about the "dialogue" between science and religion)...
Starting from Jesus, the "celebrated" these days, I cannot help but point out that the religions that have set themselves an altruistic purpose from the beginning come out of the temples. In this selfless character lay the civilizing role of religion for many peoples. It must be said, however, in order to understand some discordance sins in the interpretation of their doctrines, with all the consequences that have resulted from it (arguments, anathemas, repressions, schisms, sects, etc.) that religions keep within them esoteric elements accessible only to the clergy, and others wrongly translated according to their original form. And not always their fault.
Heraclit, quoted by Schure, tells us that the Egyptian priests had three ways of expressing an idea: 1. clear and simple, 2. symbolic and figurative and 3. sacred and hieroglyphic. The same word made sense 1. own, 2. figuratively, 3. transcendental, in other words, 1. clearly, 2. significant and 3. hidden. It is understood that the initiates had the key to this cipher.
And, this way of transmitting everything is found everywhere, in the whole human being, at least of the times then (times "continued" dogmatically to the present day), but it is also the main cause of different interpretations, which have taken many of us away from the Light.
In many ways the truth has been permanently "choked" by dogmas, by a "placement outside of us of truth", especially those of the "believe and not research" type, typical, especially, of the West. But for the sages of the Orient, the truth about us and the universe is not outside but within us, as Jesus pointed out to us with his famous "I will be in every one of you". The West has wanted to explain the world by projecting itself into the phenomena and objects of our external reality while the East has sought the explanation of the world within our soul, in the depths of the spirit, somewhere in the interface of emotion-intellect, in the space of experiences that reveals itself only to the one who by initiation learns to know the seed of knowledge, to illuminate the abyss where its essential being hides, expression of the absolute Truth.
Jesus didn't enlighten us the same way?!? The East was obsessed with the Absolute, Jesus gave it to us... And nothing that the Absolute assumes has escaped its attention: Life, Death, Time, Eternity, the Universe and Man. But He just remained in our hearts and in our Resurrection. But the East created a science for everyone and extracted the immediate practical consequence. This knowledge transformed into severely directed action, placed under the prohibition of disclosure, has meant a huge advantage over the dogmas of Western churches but also over the exoteric and speculative sciences that have found their way to concrete and never entirely.
They didn't reach the sideral heights with cosmic ships, but they surely touched them with spirit, they didn't t tall for partial truths, but for the total. Eastern spirituality cannot be judged by the level of today's technical civilization because it has not interested them (in clear contradiction with Western spirituality which seems particularly attentive to anything that can "violate" their dogmas). But we could say that everything we've accomplished through technique, they've far outdone by spirit. And there is matter and spirit, as we see. But we need both, and we can't rule one out without fragmenting our being and isolating it from the Source, breaking it from ourselves.
If we try to historically order the two types of knowledge we see that, through ancient Greece, the tradition of esoteric sciences is descending the curve of evolution. It continues with a small scale through neoplatonics, Gnostics and, closer to us, through some closed societies and some branded representation of our time. The area where priestly science had a strong influence on ancient civilization was ancient Egypt. The pharaohs themselves were initiates, and the civilization that created a major monumental art lasted several thousand years.
With Greece, science takes on an open character, enriches itself with the information of experience, observation, and, through Aristotle, begins the foundation of science. Starting from initiatory symbolic needs comes to the development of mathematics, especially geometry. Pythagoras, Tales, Euclid, Archimedes, Democritus, Heraclit, etc., have since remained reference names in the history of human thought. From the initiatory philosophy comes a pluralism of philosophical systems that still make the greatness of the old Elade today. Without this openness to knowledge of all, the world would probably have remained to archaic forms, perhaps better spiritually, but without all that civilization meant.
But, lest they forget, the Greeks created the great culture of the world that reached us, because they recorded what they "gathered", living in symbiosis with the sea, through which they constantly made contact with other worlds, with other ways of thinking, of civilization, accumulating and understanding the elements with which they made contact.
Contact with the civilization of ancient Egypt was certainly the most fruitful, say the historical sources. They came to the consciousness of human universality and imagined his ideal prototype. Hence the cultivation of the classical ideal, the perfection of the models created in art. This is how ancient Greece remained the reference model in many of its spiritual manifestations. In the museums of Rome you can see sculptures of gods and goddesses that say "Roman copy of the Greek original". All the gods of Rome are the gods of Greece, baptized with Roman names. But an empire sprawling over so many peoples, like the Roman one, could not have also had the cult for universality as the Greeks had. And the force of their spirit has left us to this day Roman Law. With the Renaissance they would match the painted image, the Greeks who reached their peak in the carved one. And so, in the Louvre, we also admire Venus of Milo and the Mona Lisa. The sublime of two past worlds, the insignia of genius fed on Earth.
But to return to the limits of religion... Religions did not extract their foundations from the physics and chemistry of this world but from another knowledge of cosmic laws, which began with initiates, prophecies, evolved and enlightened spirits. At least initially, their doctrine promoted moral values that have universal value. Unable to devoid of any moral code, Christianity, Islamism, Brahmanism, etc., moral codes elaborated on philosophical, rational bases, all are almost identical. It differs only in elements related to the specificity of the crops from which they come. That's why they played law and science in times without law and without science. In this consisted primarily of their civilizing role, of course when they did not impose themselves with the sword of another civilization, as happened, disturbingly, throughout the earth...
One question arises: given the source of knowledge of religions, they possess a complete knowledge?!? Definitely not. Even in the richest experiences of "enlightenment" only fragments are obtained in relation more to the horizon of knowledge and concerns of the person concerned. Word play is also dependent on the same factors. That's why there are so many different visions. The common elements are those that allow the development of a model, but never completely. Religions, like science, ultimately bear a human signature. We want to describe, for example, a multi-store house that we only see from the inside. This is the universe. We will never get to know him in his entirety and we will always describe the space in which we are imprisoned.
Hence the perceptible opposition between science and religion, if it exists... Both are concerns of the human spirit. Both have as their object knowledge and both have as their purpose man. Religion is concerned with its invisible dimension, science with its concrete, visible one. We have arguments today, as we have seen, that advocate for the visible and the invisible. Quantum physics describes a universe that transcends its possibility of rendering through the rational concepts with which we have been accustomed in the three-dimensional vision through stretching and substance and a multidimensional conditioning by a reality that transcends consciousness. Moreover, the legacies inferred from the structure of this universe send us, as we have seen, to concepts formulated by esoteric and religious thinking. There is, therefore, a multidimensional conditioning by a reality that transcends consciousness.
Religions have dealt with the world of the abyss within us, our inner side. Science has taken care of the outside. And there's inside and out, both of which are new. For our unit we need both sides. Religion is more aimed at the heart, more about the brain's science. And we have to have heart and brain. One dealt with the Sacred, the other the Profan. And man now needs more than ever, in the despair with which he seeks himself without finding himself, the uplifting of consciousness to the saving dimension of the Sacred.
We live in a period of great historical turmoil, of aggression manifested at all levels (war, murder, legal oppression, etc.) and thus of a spiritual fall. The picture of the world viewed in retrospect fully confirms it. If in the past, however, a conflict had consequences that history was recovering, now history can stop instead, at best. Let us give history a chance, listening to the reason of the Sacred within us, which we have long forgotten to listen to (starting from the little one among us and finishing, especially, with our leaders). Now, after years of evolution of knowledge, we are forced to intervene in the philosophical and historical dispute "Platon-Aristotle". The world of Plato's ideas is only that of the invisible dimension in which are the archetypes of the concrete world. Aristotle is the philosopher of the visible, concrete world that modern sciences have dealt with.
And there's up and down, and visible and invisible, and Plato and Aristotle. Now, after these thousands of years of questions and searches, we have concrete, tangible arguments to issue a pertinent answer through a synthesis of the two types of knowledge in order to find a way out of perhaps the worst moral crisis that man has ever experienced. Much worse than when the Unknown sent us to save his great prophets, to bring us the Light...
Between the gesture of the Resurrection of Jesus with the Light brought to and for us and the "crucifixion" of it that we choose. Let's be enlightened or crucified?!? or... Who will be the prophet of our time?
I'm going to stop now... But I will continue with possible answers for us starting with tomorrow's post...
Christ has risen! Love, Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru