STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
How
it Works... Our "Soul" (6)
Translation Draft
We're on the second day of Easter... A day without our Savior Jesus, neither Man nor Risen, left only with Barabas, the one chosen by the masses, who was the alternative to saving the one who could give us some answers about ourselves, the one who symbolized only hatred, our desire for revenge and, why not, the small symbolicness of the manipulated flock of which we were part in those times (?!?) ... or we're still part (?!?) ...
So let's try to see what answers about us we might find, even with what we know now, nowadays. Questions that don't have an answer yet...
We're out of necessity to get to know each other to know what we have to do. We wondered if, driven by a continuous thirst for knowledge, the ultimate or absolute truth is accessible to us. But all we have seen is that our senses are "cheating" us, that we perceive a reality that we see differently not only from species to species, but also from human to human.
After a naïve optimism, by virtue of which "everything is known" or "you can know", the current sciences, through modern physics, tell us that we are obliged to operate only with approximations. The "last" or more precisely "first" reality being inaccessible to us. We have therefore discussed the need to accept ways of knowledge other than those imposed by rational thinking or the exact sciences What questions have not yet been answered by the exact sciences?
Even now it cannot be defined in scientific terms the source of the Universe, the Zero Moment of the Great Beginning (the Big Bang theory imagines, or presents, the events that happened a little later, from the Big Bang to us, but not the ones before), the source of life and evolution, the mystery of death, the harmony of the universe (despite the theories that will suffice), the internal mechanisms of thought, the strange world of the psyche , and so on.m.d. All these answers can be intuited, sometimes revealed, as religions claim, as other sources involved, but never proven.
Religions themselves depart from the admission of the existence of something previous, which cannot be explained, of infinite size, which our finite mind cannot encompass. They're mysteries, to use the established term, which we don't have access to. Some of these were deciphered in empirical ways, others by intuitive thinking or with access to other levels of knowledge, and finally, their phenomenological side was known in part through the sciences. It follows from this that none of the ways can be denied in the effort of knowledge each discovering a greater or lesser part of the Truth about us but none entirely. The exclusivity of any of these can only mean a lack of information and dogmatic confinement.
Let us not forget that there are two essential sources by which we access the Truth about us: one experimental, empirically or scientifically mediated and another revealed. Likewise, let us not forget that there is absolute Truth that is inaccessible to man for two reasons: we are finite beings, an expression of the infinity that we contain but we cannot conceive it as they are then intentionally hidden truths of man because, on the one hand, they are not useful to him, and on the other hand they can be dangerous to him. It is useless to argue further (see also previous posts). Everything that man has discovered as a possibility he has used not only for but also against his fellow man.
One of the information that is hidden from us is, for example, the moment of natural death that is definitely inscribed somewhere (whether in the genome or something else). To know him in advance, for most of us, who do not know the meaning of life in the Universe, would be tantamount to a death sentence whose term would be calculated by countdown. When in psychiatric pathology we encounter people who are anxious only to the idea that they might have an incurable disease, it is easy to understand what the certainty of such a "sentence" would mean.
In conclusion, there are truths to which we have access on an empirically or scientifically mediated path and truths to which we will never access. A small part is reported under special conditions to "chosen" or "initiated", grouped since antiquity into secret initiative societies. Neither religion nor science have access to the Absolute Truth, but for other reasons. Likewise, each era has its truths, which do not appear by chance but as a result of needs. So are the revelations. Moreover, revelations do not necessarily involve mystical experiences. They had them, as we saw, and a lot of scientists. So, in order to respect the "rule of the game" we will not play back what we consider to be harmful, disturbing to our spirit and so too haunted by too many anguish in these times but, we will just stick to the concrete elements of the new medicine/ new knowledge that can help us and, above all, that will not violate "free will"...
There are two dimensions of reality, one visible and one invisible. So there is only one Reality that has visible and invisible structures. The boundary between "visible" and "invisible" is given by the ratio of energy field frequencies, low frequencies belonging to the concrete world, those high to the invisible world. Because everything is moving and transforming, we never perceive concrete reality, but only the appearance of a moment. From this appearance each perceives only a fragment, because we have a register of perception and interpretation different from individual to individual. The different way of perceiving and interpreting the world is, along with the individual interest, the source of all the misunderstandings between people. Since one cannot act on how to perceive the world, being naturally conditioned, remains to influence only human motivation.
The capacity for perception is not the expression of biological evolution, as it might seem, but of the finality of the species. As we've discussed before, there are species that, in some ways, have a much better capacity for perception than humans. So, we perceive only what we have been programmed, being programmed to perceive, first of all, only what is useful to us. Through his senses man was programmed to perceive three-dimensionally a sequentially "seen" reality. Hence the lack of adequate adaptation to reality. The Spirit was intended to reconstruct reality in its fundamental unity. Cultivation of the spirit, however, was dependent on its own option, its effort to do so, its struggle with its convenience, fears and limitations of its nature.
Speaking figuratively, the history of the Universe is a history of backstage, what you see is only the effect. We perceive a world as the effect of a cause that is beyond our reason. The visible dimension of Reality is intrinsic to matter and becomes cognoscible through biological sensors or the instruments of science. Its invisible dimension is extrinsic, transcendent, and part of it becomes cognoscible only to the spirit, as Plato says, to initiates or in exceptional circumstances. Jung and Pauli, as we have seen, consider this reality to be transcendent to the common experience, but contingent to our unconscious psychosis.
It is a unitary world, "Unus Mundus", causal, outside time and space, containing in itself the archetypes of the perceptible world and an absolute knowledge, "Save Absolute". There is, therefore, an archetypal order connected to the material physical order rendered by the senses and reason. In other words, the archetypal psychic order would contain in itself the creative intelligence of the causal order. When Jung talks about a causal order, involuntarily comes to mind the words "He who is without cause"... The invisible reality, not respecting the principle of separability and succession that appear to us in its three-dimensional conditioning, cannot be understood by the formal logic based on the principle of the excluded third party. This is where intuitive thinking works. It is the aidoma of the subatomic universe, dominated by a ternary or polyvalent logic expressed only mathematically.
Concrete reality has been, as I said above, the subject of empirical and scientific knowledge. Transcendent reality initially contained the object of esoteric knowledge, obtained by initiation within closed societies. The modern world is confronted again with this kind of knowledge but not in the esoteric but exoteric way. What was once banned for the crowd begins to become accessible to all (those interested, of course). It is the only solution to the moral crisis of the current man. Only the truth about oneself can save man, coercion, force, war, social, economic mechanisms, etc. by proving his futility.
Returning, there is, therefore, an apparent Reality, accessible to our senses and another invisible, inaccessible to our sensitive world, postulated by both ancient Oriental spirituality and modern sciences. This dimension of existence has been assigned a multitude of names. Ancient Oriental Spirituality defines it as Essential Reality, Ultimate Reality, Supreme Reality, Absolute Reality or Tao. Religions call it God, Allah, Brahma, Supreme Spirit, etc. Modern sciences use the notions of Fundamental Field, Unified Field, Universal Information Field, Orthoexistential Level, etc. I also commented on the inclusion at this level of the concepts of Cosmic Consciousness, Universal Mind – Universal Mind, Savoir Absolute, Orderly Intelligence of the Universe, etc.
The ultimate, invisible reality is essential because it is the source of visible, apparent reality. It is, therefore, primordial and eternal. at its level are located what Plato called Ideas (archetypes and patterns), morphogenetic models of the concrete world. The first is non-manifest, the other is manifest and apparent, visible and ephemeral. From the non-manifest world is born matter, which is nothing but energy from the fundamental field. By decondensation passes into the substance, after which it returns again to the source (there is a lot of speculation on the inputs and outputs of matter at the level of "black holes" – black holes and "white holes" – white holes). Matter therefore comes from infinity, takes finite forms circumscribed causally and spatial-temporal listed according to informational models inscribed in the invisible dimension and returns again to infinity, after an evolution subject going inexorably to multiple internal rhythms and great cosmic cycles.
So it's time we could talk about the invisible body and the visible body. Corresponding to the reality described above, the entire living world would have a visible body and another invisible body. The visible body is noticeable, three-dimensional conditioning and manifests itself only at this level by virtue of the specific laws of this dimension: past, present, future, birth, development, death, etc. The invisible body is our primary matrix, it's the field that contains all the information of our cosmic peregrinations. It is part of the information-energy dimension and is subject to its laws which, as we have seen, recognizes another Space-Time and has another destiny, reuniting the fundamental information field in which it originates. We could compare its fate to that of the grain of wheat which, by cultivation in the earth, will multiply.
By passing our energy matrix into the substance to obtain an enrichment of experience, a cumulation of information that "tests" the correctness or incorrectness (if any) of the absolute information held. By its enriched return to the original state it will be a source of evolution for other living structures that will begin a new cosmic cycle, on the same "stage" or in another different, usually superior. This is why it is perceived that all states of existence are finite, because they pass from one state to another. As a result, nothing has "eternal life" since the material Universe itself undergoes cyclical transformations. Only the primordial body, born directly from the universal field, appears to us, therefore, unperishable in relation to the earth's time, being placed in a timeless context.
To bring some clarification we can "suck" the problem from another point of view. According to the two ways of seeing the world, there are also two modes of expression: one rational and one symbolic. Rational expression is specific to the world of the conscious, the symbolic one being specific to the world of the unconscious. We remember that the transcendent dimension is contingent from the unconscious world in which archetypes are found as structural and functional models of concrete reality. Expression at this level is therefore symbolic.
It corresponds, at the same time, to the size of the Sacred. Therefore, the path of communication at this level is mediated by symbols, rituals, invocations, etc. The ritual used by religions, esoteric societies are only symbolic means of expression, accessible only to the initiated, constituting at the same time means of connection to archetypal information.
Health and disease, in turn, also depend on the world of symbols, of archetypes. The whole universe speaks to us through symbols, the man himself coming into the world with the signature of a symbol. Loss of the symbol means moral crisis and illness (physical or mental). Retrieving it is health. There are therapeutic techniques that, by decrypting and rendering their own symbol, lead to the restoration of health, sometimes even in "major" diseases, incurable in other ways. Of course, this path/possibility is not always accessible to classical medicine that addresses a rational world and ignores the symbolic one. But, let's go back!
At the same level of the world of symbols there is also the numerical expression of phenomena in the universe. Any being, object or phenomenon can be expressed by a number corresponding to the field frequency of its energy substrate, the number of atoms in its structure, going up to the date of "arrival" in the world, used in various techniques of an initial esoteric character. Viewed in this way, the numbers no longer appear to us as a quantitative expression of reality but also with an ontological function. They appear to be something that can be addressed with certainty and uncertainty.
There are some elaborate concepts of modern physics that oblige us to almost completely revise our vision of the world. Let's review their importance and consequences! The principle of uncertainty that reigns in the physics of the quantum universe no longer allows us to issue rigid verdicts based on a determinism that turns out not to have a scientific basis. In the intimacy of matter there is another reason, different from the one with which we operate normally.
The principle of the self-consistency of matter from which its non-separationability arises, postulated by bootstrap theory, and the concept of holographic representation have consequences of extraordinary importance to us, if we extrapolate them to social. It follows from these concepts that no one exists only for himself, but is a node of interrelationships, of interactions with others. Our limits are therefore indistinct. It's hard to tell what belongs to us and what we owe to others.
So we are vitally connected to others, dependent on them and our attitude towards them, which should be "consequential". In this confluence with the world, any action exerted at one point will automatically reflect on the whole. We cannot, therefore, evade the laws of the universe even when we think in solitude and silence, because our brain, our body does not exist and works only in connection with other brains, visible or invisible, known or unknown.
We will understand why, in this context, our negative actions towards others or just thought will have a detrimental influence on the whole in which we live. The suffering caused will be everyone's, including ours. By hurting, then, someone else is hurting everyone and us. Conversely, good thoughts, positive acts will have a beneficial reflection on others and ours. We now have a pertinent explanation of the exhortations to love, gratitude, understanding, generosity, altruism, modesty, respect for others, the concentration of our minds only on positive thoughts. We understand why hatred, envy, aggression, greed, vice, hubris, any other negative gesture or thought are harmful to us and others.
We reap what we sow, no matter how we feel like we're manipulating the crop. And if we think of our long history, mined by all the slag of defulated instincts and uncensored egos and egos, then the life we have should not groom us. No one escapes, not even the most valuable soul that can appear in the miserable ocean of the whole flawed. It's like, as a fish, you're born in a tainted, deadly ocean, where all the other fish are hunted to prolong their miserable existence without acting in any way to cleanse the ocean and make it conducive to life. How hopeless would this "oceanic evolution" be if you come to have no idea whatsoever about cleanliness, all dedicated to the misery elevated to the rank of virtue of hunting others?!?
It also becomes scientifically explicable the major mark on which human fulfillment is conditional, namely that in all our actions we aim first and foremost at the good of our fellow man. Indirectly, the effect will be reflected on all. It is therefore necessary to concentrate the positive efforts of all people so that in the fundamental field, propitious, majority, favorable forces are created at the level of history, of destiny. And this action is being carried out because we have seen that it functions as a global entity. Have all these religions known which, without exception, imagined almost identical moral codes?
Clearly, the initiated knew them, because we meet them in everyone's history. And hence the overtime meeting of religions with science. Is it by chance?!? Is it not significant precisely for the 1914 century (World War I) – 2014/ 2015, which cannot be compared as a stalemate to any other in the existence of the world?!? It's never been a question of either or. Either we radically change our behavior, or... most likely, we die. If there was once a flood, a junta was found for Noah. But when the whole planet lights up, where do you hide?
Two great unfulfillments make human tragedy, we believe: the drama of psychological unfulfillment generated by the ignorance of our own truth, of the meaning that we have in life and which is expressed by valences related to the authentic self, its essence, especially the drama of dissatisfaction in the plan of social living. The whole history of human society is a history of fighting, war, murder, drama, suffering that have taken over common, constructive efforts, love and understanding. And, above all, the source of social non-fulfilment is political struggles, evidenced by the very current political systems that rely on democracies (controlled by interests, manipulable and not concrete, real) or autocracy, regardless of their form of manifestation.
Any policy means the "truth" of a social group that is expressed through "customized" interests, only emotionally motivated impressions and invented principles that maintain a dictatorship of all "customized" evils. Leadership under one party, a single leader (or reunited) means the complete triumph of these "custom" evils. Several parties would mean diminishing them by counterbalancing resulting from the confrontation, but it is not a real promotion of truth because it is not political in nature, but scientific.
The truth of science about man is man's only real policy. And politics must "counterbalance" and extract its principles from science and not from subjective opinions, from doctrines (without a chance to become dogmas) "customized". One example is Marxism, which claimed to have a scientific basis, but contrary to the assertions, it had as its support only dogmas resulting from a limited materialistic-dialectical knowledge specific to the 19th century in science. Nothing that was real scientific, modern knowledge was accepted. We know the fate of genetics, cybernetics, computer science, not to mention religion. So was everything that constituted the "nationalist-socialist truth" (of the "Nazi" of Nazionismus, of Hitler), founded "as scientifically as possible". We always forget that everything he did and everyone who supported him was "perfectly legal."
Based on a true silt, no such system has survived, just as no other social systems that are based on the complete truth or, at least, on the direct connection with people, that is to say, of the guardian of the people without exception and not of one or more groups formed on political criteria (dictatorship of democracy or any other form of dictatorship). Why we have to accept this global "call". For example, in the history of the world, only once has a government been achieved based on principles resulting from a synthesis of the sciences of the time.
This was achieved in Pythagoras' time when, on his initiative, the Crotone leadership accepted the "Council of Three Hundred" made up of scholars elected by Pythagoras and the "Council of A Thousand" made up of people elected on democratic but political grounds. But after almost a quarter of a century of operation, Pythagoras' settlement ends in arson by the crowd sparked by a certain Cylon who had once been turned down for ineptitude at the school of the great scholar. Unfortunately, in the confrontation between Intelligence and the opposite they defeated the many "affected" by an "erroneous" distribution of the product and not of intelligence. The politician focused on "profit distribution" (regardless of its form) defeated the "knowledge distribution" agreement.
Caiaphas defeated the Messiah, the plebeia defeated the Son of God who accepted the sacrifice for them and chose Barabas, who "represented" their interests against Rome. So Pilate (the politician) washed his hands of Man's fate under threat of interest. Will this always be the case until a profit is completed?!?
Instead of conclusions to "listen" here to the sociologist of origin Romanian, Basarab Nicolescu: "If we knew that being violent against others, this violence would be felt physically by ourselves, then we would make this violence disappear from an elemental selfishness. If we knew that by going to war, it physically translates to our own death, then we would make the same elementary selfishness disappear, war. if we knew that separatability, subject-object dualism, local causality are really nothing but approximations, illusions nourished by our ignorance and vanity, then we would stop inventing dogmas, firm ideological systems, utopias that fall inexorably into destruction and suffering. After all, all past or present societies are founded on the illusions of classical realism."
The sacred and the profane. "The consciousness of a real and significant world is closely linked to the discovery of the Sacred," Mircea Eliade told us. Where the great historian of religions regards the Sacred as an element that is part of the structure of consciousness and not just as a moment in its evolution. The sacred presupposes fear, mystery and fascination in the face of the unknown. It is the feeling in the face of divinity by which interrogations concerning the Source and Destiny of the Being obtain an answer.
Transcendent reality was the object of the sacred, the concrete reality, that of the Profan. The history of man is a history of his becoming from the Sacred to the Profane, specifically of the fall from the Sacred to the Profan. In a reductionist expression, the Sacred dealt with religion, profan science. With or without his will, man's whole life is an oscillation between the Sacred and the Profane. Through the Sacred, the Self, the Essential Being, its own truth, that of the being in which the finality and action, the symbol and the real are inscribed, develop and discover.
At first man's life was in relation to the Sacred, Mircea Eliade puts us. As scientific knowledge progresses, the territory of the Sacred narrows because the explanation of the immediate causes has led people to neglect the distant ones, located at the origins. But the loss of his relationship with the Sacred deprived the man of the knowledge of the essential reality. It is left only to the phenomenon, because the essence is neither accessible to science nor concerns it, having another object or having no tangible evidence to this effect.
The loss of the Sacred and the cultivation of only the Profan at the level of social action resulted in the entire drama of human history expressed through political battles, wars, dictatorships, verbal and physical aggression, devotion, intolerance, etc. When man learns only that he is an animal that came into the world by chance, even by selective evolution, endowed with instincts and reason capable of inventing sophisticated means of action, it seems plausible, timely and profitable to set only goals of domination, supremacy or the like...
Come on, I'm getting "cyclical"... I'll stop here (Enough for today)! Tomorrow (the third day of "Easter") we will "talk" about religion in the modern world (chit that I start going to work).
We're on the second day of Easter... A day without our Savior Jesus, neither Man nor Risen, left only with Barabas, the one chosen by the masses, who was the alternative to saving the one who could give us some answers about ourselves, the one who symbolized only hatred, our desire for revenge and, why not, the small symbolicness of the manipulated flock of which we were part in those times (?!?) ... or we're still part (?!?) ...
So let's try to see what answers about us we might find, even with what we know now, nowadays. Questions that don't have an answer yet...
We're out of necessity to get to know each other to know what we have to do. We wondered if, driven by a continuous thirst for knowledge, the ultimate or absolute truth is accessible to us. But all we have seen is that our senses are "cheating" us, that we perceive a reality that we see differently not only from species to species, but also from human to human.
After a naïve optimism, by virtue of which "everything is known" or "you can know", the current sciences, through modern physics, tell us that we are obliged to operate only with approximations. The "last" or more precisely "first" reality being inaccessible to us. We have therefore discussed the need to accept ways of knowledge other than those imposed by rational thinking or the exact sciences What questions have not yet been answered by the exact sciences?
Even now it cannot be defined in scientific terms the source of the Universe, the Zero Moment of the Great Beginning (the Big Bang theory imagines, or presents, the events that happened a little later, from the Big Bang to us, but not the ones before), the source of life and evolution, the mystery of death, the harmony of the universe (despite the theories that will suffice), the internal mechanisms of thought, the strange world of the psyche , and so on.m.d. All these answers can be intuited, sometimes revealed, as religions claim, as other sources involved, but never proven.
Religions themselves depart from the admission of the existence of something previous, which cannot be explained, of infinite size, which our finite mind cannot encompass. They're mysteries, to use the established term, which we don't have access to. Some of these were deciphered in empirical ways, others by intuitive thinking or with access to other levels of knowledge, and finally, their phenomenological side was known in part through the sciences. It follows from this that none of the ways can be denied in the effort of knowledge each discovering a greater or lesser part of the Truth about us but none entirely. The exclusivity of any of these can only mean a lack of information and dogmatic confinement.
Let us not forget that there are two essential sources by which we access the Truth about us: one experimental, empirically or scientifically mediated and another revealed. Likewise, let us not forget that there is absolute Truth that is inaccessible to man for two reasons: we are finite beings, an expression of the infinity that we contain but we cannot conceive it as they are then intentionally hidden truths of man because, on the one hand, they are not useful to him, and on the other hand they can be dangerous to him. It is useless to argue further (see also previous posts). Everything that man has discovered as a possibility he has used not only for but also against his fellow man.
One of the information that is hidden from us is, for example, the moment of natural death that is definitely inscribed somewhere (whether in the genome or something else). To know him in advance, for most of us, who do not know the meaning of life in the Universe, would be tantamount to a death sentence whose term would be calculated by countdown. When in psychiatric pathology we encounter people who are anxious only to the idea that they might have an incurable disease, it is easy to understand what the certainty of such a "sentence" would mean.
In conclusion, there are truths to which we have access on an empirically or scientifically mediated path and truths to which we will never access. A small part is reported under special conditions to "chosen" or "initiated", grouped since antiquity into secret initiative societies. Neither religion nor science have access to the Absolute Truth, but for other reasons. Likewise, each era has its truths, which do not appear by chance but as a result of needs. So are the revelations. Moreover, revelations do not necessarily involve mystical experiences. They had them, as we saw, and a lot of scientists. So, in order to respect the "rule of the game" we will not play back what we consider to be harmful, disturbing to our spirit and so too haunted by too many anguish in these times but, we will just stick to the concrete elements of the new medicine/ new knowledge that can help us and, above all, that will not violate "free will"...
There are two dimensions of reality, one visible and one invisible. So there is only one Reality that has visible and invisible structures. The boundary between "visible" and "invisible" is given by the ratio of energy field frequencies, low frequencies belonging to the concrete world, those high to the invisible world. Because everything is moving and transforming, we never perceive concrete reality, but only the appearance of a moment. From this appearance each perceives only a fragment, because we have a register of perception and interpretation different from individual to individual. The different way of perceiving and interpreting the world is, along with the individual interest, the source of all the misunderstandings between people. Since one cannot act on how to perceive the world, being naturally conditioned, remains to influence only human motivation.
The capacity for perception is not the expression of biological evolution, as it might seem, but of the finality of the species. As we've discussed before, there are species that, in some ways, have a much better capacity for perception than humans. So, we perceive only what we have been programmed, being programmed to perceive, first of all, only what is useful to us. Through his senses man was programmed to perceive three-dimensionally a sequentially "seen" reality. Hence the lack of adequate adaptation to reality. The Spirit was intended to reconstruct reality in its fundamental unity. Cultivation of the spirit, however, was dependent on its own option, its effort to do so, its struggle with its convenience, fears and limitations of its nature.
Speaking figuratively, the history of the Universe is a history of backstage, what you see is only the effect. We perceive a world as the effect of a cause that is beyond our reason. The visible dimension of Reality is intrinsic to matter and becomes cognoscible through biological sensors or the instruments of science. Its invisible dimension is extrinsic, transcendent, and part of it becomes cognoscible only to the spirit, as Plato says, to initiates or in exceptional circumstances. Jung and Pauli, as we have seen, consider this reality to be transcendent to the common experience, but contingent to our unconscious psychosis.
It is a unitary world, "Unus Mundus", causal, outside time and space, containing in itself the archetypes of the perceptible world and an absolute knowledge, "Save Absolute". There is, therefore, an archetypal order connected to the material physical order rendered by the senses and reason. In other words, the archetypal psychic order would contain in itself the creative intelligence of the causal order. When Jung talks about a causal order, involuntarily comes to mind the words "He who is without cause"... The invisible reality, not respecting the principle of separability and succession that appear to us in its three-dimensional conditioning, cannot be understood by the formal logic based on the principle of the excluded third party. This is where intuitive thinking works. It is the aidoma of the subatomic universe, dominated by a ternary or polyvalent logic expressed only mathematically.
Concrete reality has been, as I said above, the subject of empirical and scientific knowledge. Transcendent reality initially contained the object of esoteric knowledge, obtained by initiation within closed societies. The modern world is confronted again with this kind of knowledge but not in the esoteric but exoteric way. What was once banned for the crowd begins to become accessible to all (those interested, of course). It is the only solution to the moral crisis of the current man. Only the truth about oneself can save man, coercion, force, war, social, economic mechanisms, etc. by proving his futility.
Returning, there is, therefore, an apparent Reality, accessible to our senses and another invisible, inaccessible to our sensitive world, postulated by both ancient Oriental spirituality and modern sciences. This dimension of existence has been assigned a multitude of names. Ancient Oriental Spirituality defines it as Essential Reality, Ultimate Reality, Supreme Reality, Absolute Reality or Tao. Religions call it God, Allah, Brahma, Supreme Spirit, etc. Modern sciences use the notions of Fundamental Field, Unified Field, Universal Information Field, Orthoexistential Level, etc. I also commented on the inclusion at this level of the concepts of Cosmic Consciousness, Universal Mind – Universal Mind, Savoir Absolute, Orderly Intelligence of the Universe, etc.
The ultimate, invisible reality is essential because it is the source of visible, apparent reality. It is, therefore, primordial and eternal. at its level are located what Plato called Ideas (archetypes and patterns), morphogenetic models of the concrete world. The first is non-manifest, the other is manifest and apparent, visible and ephemeral. From the non-manifest world is born matter, which is nothing but energy from the fundamental field. By decondensation passes into the substance, after which it returns again to the source (there is a lot of speculation on the inputs and outputs of matter at the level of "black holes" – black holes and "white holes" – white holes). Matter therefore comes from infinity, takes finite forms circumscribed causally and spatial-temporal listed according to informational models inscribed in the invisible dimension and returns again to infinity, after an evolution subject going inexorably to multiple internal rhythms and great cosmic cycles.
So it's time we could talk about the invisible body and the visible body. Corresponding to the reality described above, the entire living world would have a visible body and another invisible body. The visible body is noticeable, three-dimensional conditioning and manifests itself only at this level by virtue of the specific laws of this dimension: past, present, future, birth, development, death, etc. The invisible body is our primary matrix, it's the field that contains all the information of our cosmic peregrinations. It is part of the information-energy dimension and is subject to its laws which, as we have seen, recognizes another Space-Time and has another destiny, reuniting the fundamental information field in which it originates. We could compare its fate to that of the grain of wheat which, by cultivation in the earth, will multiply.
By passing our energy matrix into the substance to obtain an enrichment of experience, a cumulation of information that "tests" the correctness or incorrectness (if any) of the absolute information held. By its enriched return to the original state it will be a source of evolution for other living structures that will begin a new cosmic cycle, on the same "stage" or in another different, usually superior. This is why it is perceived that all states of existence are finite, because they pass from one state to another. As a result, nothing has "eternal life" since the material Universe itself undergoes cyclical transformations. Only the primordial body, born directly from the universal field, appears to us, therefore, unperishable in relation to the earth's time, being placed in a timeless context.
To bring some clarification we can "suck" the problem from another point of view. According to the two ways of seeing the world, there are also two modes of expression: one rational and one symbolic. Rational expression is specific to the world of the conscious, the symbolic one being specific to the world of the unconscious. We remember that the transcendent dimension is contingent from the unconscious world in which archetypes are found as structural and functional models of concrete reality. Expression at this level is therefore symbolic.
It corresponds, at the same time, to the size of the Sacred. Therefore, the path of communication at this level is mediated by symbols, rituals, invocations, etc. The ritual used by religions, esoteric societies are only symbolic means of expression, accessible only to the initiated, constituting at the same time means of connection to archetypal information.
Health and disease, in turn, also depend on the world of symbols, of archetypes. The whole universe speaks to us through symbols, the man himself coming into the world with the signature of a symbol. Loss of the symbol means moral crisis and illness (physical or mental). Retrieving it is health. There are therapeutic techniques that, by decrypting and rendering their own symbol, lead to the restoration of health, sometimes even in "major" diseases, incurable in other ways. Of course, this path/possibility is not always accessible to classical medicine that addresses a rational world and ignores the symbolic one. But, let's go back!
At the same level of the world of symbols there is also the numerical expression of phenomena in the universe. Any being, object or phenomenon can be expressed by a number corresponding to the field frequency of its energy substrate, the number of atoms in its structure, going up to the date of "arrival" in the world, used in various techniques of an initial esoteric character. Viewed in this way, the numbers no longer appear to us as a quantitative expression of reality but also with an ontological function. They appear to be something that can be addressed with certainty and uncertainty.
There are some elaborate concepts of modern physics that oblige us to almost completely revise our vision of the world. Let's review their importance and consequences! The principle of uncertainty that reigns in the physics of the quantum universe no longer allows us to issue rigid verdicts based on a determinism that turns out not to have a scientific basis. In the intimacy of matter there is another reason, different from the one with which we operate normally.
The principle of the self-consistency of matter from which its non-separationability arises, postulated by bootstrap theory, and the concept of holographic representation have consequences of extraordinary importance to us, if we extrapolate them to social. It follows from these concepts that no one exists only for himself, but is a node of interrelationships, of interactions with others. Our limits are therefore indistinct. It's hard to tell what belongs to us and what we owe to others.
So we are vitally connected to others, dependent on them and our attitude towards them, which should be "consequential". In this confluence with the world, any action exerted at one point will automatically reflect on the whole. We cannot, therefore, evade the laws of the universe even when we think in solitude and silence, because our brain, our body does not exist and works only in connection with other brains, visible or invisible, known or unknown.
We will understand why, in this context, our negative actions towards others or just thought will have a detrimental influence on the whole in which we live. The suffering caused will be everyone's, including ours. By hurting, then, someone else is hurting everyone and us. Conversely, good thoughts, positive acts will have a beneficial reflection on others and ours. We now have a pertinent explanation of the exhortations to love, gratitude, understanding, generosity, altruism, modesty, respect for others, the concentration of our minds only on positive thoughts. We understand why hatred, envy, aggression, greed, vice, hubris, any other negative gesture or thought are harmful to us and others.
We reap what we sow, no matter how we feel like we're manipulating the crop. And if we think of our long history, mined by all the slag of defulated instincts and uncensored egos and egos, then the life we have should not groom us. No one escapes, not even the most valuable soul that can appear in the miserable ocean of the whole flawed. It's like, as a fish, you're born in a tainted, deadly ocean, where all the other fish are hunted to prolong their miserable existence without acting in any way to cleanse the ocean and make it conducive to life. How hopeless would this "oceanic evolution" be if you come to have no idea whatsoever about cleanliness, all dedicated to the misery elevated to the rank of virtue of hunting others?!?
It also becomes scientifically explicable the major mark on which human fulfillment is conditional, namely that in all our actions we aim first and foremost at the good of our fellow man. Indirectly, the effect will be reflected on all. It is therefore necessary to concentrate the positive efforts of all people so that in the fundamental field, propitious, majority, favorable forces are created at the level of history, of destiny. And this action is being carried out because we have seen that it functions as a global entity. Have all these religions known which, without exception, imagined almost identical moral codes?
Clearly, the initiated knew them, because we meet them in everyone's history. And hence the overtime meeting of religions with science. Is it by chance?!? Is it not significant precisely for the 1914 century (World War I) – 2014/ 2015, which cannot be compared as a stalemate to any other in the existence of the world?!? It's never been a question of either or. Either we radically change our behavior, or... most likely, we die. If there was once a flood, a junta was found for Noah. But when the whole planet lights up, where do you hide?
Two great unfulfillments make human tragedy, we believe: the drama of psychological unfulfillment generated by the ignorance of our own truth, of the meaning that we have in life and which is expressed by valences related to the authentic self, its essence, especially the drama of dissatisfaction in the plan of social living. The whole history of human society is a history of fighting, war, murder, drama, suffering that have taken over common, constructive efforts, love and understanding. And, above all, the source of social non-fulfilment is political struggles, evidenced by the very current political systems that rely on democracies (controlled by interests, manipulable and not concrete, real) or autocracy, regardless of their form of manifestation.
Any policy means the "truth" of a social group that is expressed through "customized" interests, only emotionally motivated impressions and invented principles that maintain a dictatorship of all "customized" evils. Leadership under one party, a single leader (or reunited) means the complete triumph of these "custom" evils. Several parties would mean diminishing them by counterbalancing resulting from the confrontation, but it is not a real promotion of truth because it is not political in nature, but scientific.
The truth of science about man is man's only real policy. And politics must "counterbalance" and extract its principles from science and not from subjective opinions, from doctrines (without a chance to become dogmas) "customized". One example is Marxism, which claimed to have a scientific basis, but contrary to the assertions, it had as its support only dogmas resulting from a limited materialistic-dialectical knowledge specific to the 19th century in science. Nothing that was real scientific, modern knowledge was accepted. We know the fate of genetics, cybernetics, computer science, not to mention religion. So was everything that constituted the "nationalist-socialist truth" (of the "Nazi" of Nazionismus, of Hitler), founded "as scientifically as possible". We always forget that everything he did and everyone who supported him was "perfectly legal."
Based on a true silt, no such system has survived, just as no other social systems that are based on the complete truth or, at least, on the direct connection with people, that is to say, of the guardian of the people without exception and not of one or more groups formed on political criteria (dictatorship of democracy or any other form of dictatorship). Why we have to accept this global "call". For example, in the history of the world, only once has a government been achieved based on principles resulting from a synthesis of the sciences of the time.
This was achieved in Pythagoras' time when, on his initiative, the Crotone leadership accepted the "Council of Three Hundred" made up of scholars elected by Pythagoras and the "Council of A Thousand" made up of people elected on democratic but political grounds. But after almost a quarter of a century of operation, Pythagoras' settlement ends in arson by the crowd sparked by a certain Cylon who had once been turned down for ineptitude at the school of the great scholar. Unfortunately, in the confrontation between Intelligence and the opposite they defeated the many "affected" by an "erroneous" distribution of the product and not of intelligence. The politician focused on "profit distribution" (regardless of its form) defeated the "knowledge distribution" agreement.
Caiaphas defeated the Messiah, the plebeia defeated the Son of God who accepted the sacrifice for them and chose Barabas, who "represented" their interests against Rome. So Pilate (the politician) washed his hands of Man's fate under threat of interest. Will this always be the case until a profit is completed?!?
Instead of conclusions to "listen" here to the sociologist of origin Romanian, Basarab Nicolescu: "If we knew that being violent against others, this violence would be felt physically by ourselves, then we would make this violence disappear from an elemental selfishness. If we knew that by going to war, it physically translates to our own death, then we would make the same elementary selfishness disappear, war. if we knew that separatability, subject-object dualism, local causality are really nothing but approximations, illusions nourished by our ignorance and vanity, then we would stop inventing dogmas, firm ideological systems, utopias that fall inexorably into destruction and suffering. After all, all past or present societies are founded on the illusions of classical realism."
The sacred and the profane. "The consciousness of a real and significant world is closely linked to the discovery of the Sacred," Mircea Eliade told us. Where the great historian of religions regards the Sacred as an element that is part of the structure of consciousness and not just as a moment in its evolution. The sacred presupposes fear, mystery and fascination in the face of the unknown. It is the feeling in the face of divinity by which interrogations concerning the Source and Destiny of the Being obtain an answer.
Transcendent reality was the object of the sacred, the concrete reality, that of the Profan. The history of man is a history of his becoming from the Sacred to the Profane, specifically of the fall from the Sacred to the Profan. In a reductionist expression, the Sacred dealt with religion, profan science. With or without his will, man's whole life is an oscillation between the Sacred and the Profane. Through the Sacred, the Self, the Essential Being, its own truth, that of the being in which the finality and action, the symbol and the real are inscribed, develop and discover.
At first man's life was in relation to the Sacred, Mircea Eliade puts us. As scientific knowledge progresses, the territory of the Sacred narrows because the explanation of the immediate causes has led people to neglect the distant ones, located at the origins. But the loss of his relationship with the Sacred deprived the man of the knowledge of the essential reality. It is left only to the phenomenon, because the essence is neither accessible to science nor concerns it, having another object or having no tangible evidence to this effect.
The loss of the Sacred and the cultivation of only the Profan at the level of social action resulted in the entire drama of human history expressed through political battles, wars, dictatorships, verbal and physical aggression, devotion, intolerance, etc. When man learns only that he is an animal that came into the world by chance, even by selective evolution, endowed with instincts and reason capable of inventing sophisticated means of action, it seems plausible, timely and profitable to set only goals of domination, supremacy or the like...
Come on, I'm getting "cyclical"... I'll stop here (Enough for today)! Tomorrow (the third day of "Easter") we will "talk" about religion in the modern world (chit that I start going to work).
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru