STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
Practices and control - Introduction (2).
Translation Draft
Yesterday's post (post) ended (forced by my logic and my available time) to the idea of "if we are able to distinguish the contradictions (in the purely general sense of the term) that arise in our lives".
The first "problem" that appears as an interference in our ability to distinguish something (here the reference is general and is not limited to contradictions) is related to the fact that people react to the image they make (accumulates, interprets, hierarchies, etc.), to their model of reality and not to reality itself. yes, you read it right... Each of us "absorbs" the information given every moment of life and stores it more unconsciously and less consciously in a kind of archive that will be used more unconsciously than consciously. Modern studies unquestionably reveal this reality.
For example, the period of unconditional accumulation is that of childhood (on average located until around the age of 10), popularly delineated by the "seven years at home"... The child does not have the discernment to select the information that receives and accepts it. Moreover, it has been scientifically proven that acceptance is "non-selective" in almost 100% of cases both consciously and unconsciously. It basically seems that there would be no real problems in this "behaviour", that reality is reality and we all accept it unconditionally as a perception but we try to shape it as soon as we have the capacity.
Modern psychological studies tell us something else. Without going into details, think of the children running on the Maidan, dirty, sweaty, dusty in a direct comparison with the "cocoons" of the "educated"! 95% of childhood disorders will be found in "chocolates" who have received (and unfortunately unconsciously assimilated) information about the "harmfulness" of the environment. Subsequently, more than 75% of the adult's diseases will also be found in these "former informed children". Or, reality is one for all and the justifications with different immunity are obviously "childish".
A statement full of "wisdom" like "cleans Mommy's apple peel that no matter how well washed it still has germs" will deprive the child of the vitamin and chemical essence of the whole apple (and this is true for many fruits – for example I can only remember the inner skin of the graft, the inner membranes of walnuts, the skin of tomatoes/tomatoes, grapes, etc. – the most "strident" example is that related to the consumption of garlic which is rapidly assimilated with the smell of "crude" and/ or the peasant and permanently deprives the future individual of its therapeutic power). The clarification I mentioned will form the reality of the future adult who will not return to correcting the error except in very rare cases. But things are much broader...
If 400 years ago you'd told someone about electricity or television or airplanes and cars, not only would they not understand anything but most likely laugh at you or take you to the inquisition. These days these are things so natural that no one makes a case for them anymore. It's changed the generally accepted image of the world, our map of reality, and with it and people's reaction to certain things. However, even today, many of their contemporaries have difficulty imagining that subtle material forces would be real and that they could influence the existence of any man.
But 400 years ago, no one would have doubted that. What else to take into account the fact that the whole human is composed of different parts closely related to each other?!? That changing one element influences the others?!? Even if something in this "direction" happened to each of us. For example, due to a surprising change, a man feels extremely happy and you notice this from his body attitude. His gait is different, his behavior changes, his facial expression, all expressing his great inner joy. Also, a bodily injury can scare his spirit and affect his logical thinking.
The various modern body psychotherapies (bioenergetics, Reiki therapeutics, etc..m etc.) systematically use these relationships for the good of the client.
Going forward, the individual who is more flexible compared to his peers will largely form his environment. If you have set certain attitudes in your relationships with others, you may have certain difficulties. If you convey your instructions only in a command tone, you will determine to individuals who are not accustomed to it, or to those who prefer harmonious forms of communication, the appearance of a form of resistance. Moreover, this will manifest itself on one's own person who will perceive anything outside his own reality as a clear inserency in the way of management, type command to make others like you...
If, however, you fail to set the stubborn ones in motion by submitting your requests in a form that does not allow doubt, when it cannot be otherwise, there will be situations when you cannot handle it. Who can do both things and apply them flexibly, as needed, will be able to solve constructively, with more of those around, more problems. In this way, automatically, he will have more chances to become a leader than others who have limited choice. In addition, acceptance and flexibility can quickly make our individual a landmark an example that can be followed much more easily and securely by others. In conjunction with the above, what would be the consequences of a malability under the conditions of a perceived environment wrongly. The consensus disappears with both one's own person and those around it, and constrictive behaviors that generate conflict in the strongest...
May it be remembered that the vegetative nervous system, also called autonomous, has completely "un-to-place" reactions under the conditions of a perceived environment erroneously, misshapenly shaped by concepts from the period of unconditional assimilation, and even after this unconditionalization?!? Consensuality with the indoor and/ or external environment quickly leads to the accumulation and/ or amplification of conflicts, and thus the problem of unhappiness and/ or disease arises. Or, unhappy, sick people are not finished, if we expand the logic of misinterpretation of the environment. They're just incorrectly using what they can and have at that time of analysis.
It is shown that he who lives in harmony with himself and lovingly accepts all that he represents (both his needs and his weaknesses) is happy and satisfied regardless of the "inconsistency" of his global image of the environment. The one who tries to be another, who maintains his action due to erroneous perceptions of the environment, who denies himself or a certain part of himself, confronts himself and consumes his time and forces in the absurd struggle against his own identity (his own identity that is real and not shaped by more or less conscious concepts).
This is where unhappiness and disease come from. Therefore, people who want to lead a better life, just need to develop understanding of themselves and let things work as they fit, in vibration according to reality and not that shaped by their perceptions. Anyone who tries, for example, to make a career in a profession that does not suit him, wastes his qualities (at best – most of the time it will strengthen the misperception of the environment and the conflicts of multiply and/ or amplify). If they tried to find an activity that would match them, they would get more success, more appreciation, they would do more useful things for themselves and the world, and they would begin to eliminate misperceptions and assimilate the right ones.
Let me also mention here the theories related to the mask and submask (shown extensively in previous posts)?!? May I mention here our soul/spirit with all that attracts?!? There would be things that, at first glance, would further complicate everything...
It should not be understood so far that there is the possibility of blaming previously assimilated misperceptions or the multitude of parameters that arise in any kind of consideration. I stressed that it is very important to make me feel, to adapt. Everyone acts as best they can at the time. You also learned something important and thought, "Oh, my God, if I'd known that then, I wouldn't have made so many mistakes." That's correct. But in order to learn this now, up to that point you had to gather experiences and integrate them into your personality (not to mention the need to correct old "views" or concretely sustainable interests).
Then you just couldn't, and that's why you did some less satisfying things than you could have done right now. In a few years, you'll think alike about what you're doing now. And? We all constantly change, learn, adapt and become more competent. Allow yourself to accept your current capabilities, use them and rejoice that tomorrow you will be able to do the same thing better, because you have decided to learn constantly from what happens to you in life. In a certain context, each action is useful and valuable. Imagine that you constantly express yourself unclear, rarely respect your word, help others make mistakes, avoid acting or never take responsibility.
Maybe now you're thinking, "That would be terrible, who else would want to have anything to do with me!?! No one will take me seriously anymore to progress." This attitude might not be very useful in your environment, but if you were a politician, acting in this way, you would have a bright and promising perspective of ascension (offf, I don't want to refer to current politics, no matter where it manifests itself)... This example may seem too harsh to you, but think of the fact that there are so many life situations, cultures and subcultures that no matter what you do, in at least one situation, it would be good for you to act just as you act at that hypothetical moment, of the example presented...
And so much for our struggle with old and unconditional accumulations (I could find many other details but, my main goal is to get as quickly and understandable as possible to practice and control). Tomorrow I will discuss our choice possibilities both from the existing "dowry" and from what we are at the time "now" considered for any decision and, by implication, subsequent action...
A week full of the good to you and those around you!
Yesterday's post (post) ended (forced by my logic and my available time) to the idea of "if we are able to distinguish the contradictions (in the purely general sense of the term) that arise in our lives".
The first "problem" that appears as an interference in our ability to distinguish something (here the reference is general and is not limited to contradictions) is related to the fact that people react to the image they make (accumulates, interprets, hierarchies, etc.), to their model of reality and not to reality itself. yes, you read it right... Each of us "absorbs" the information given every moment of life and stores it more unconsciously and less consciously in a kind of archive that will be used more unconsciously than consciously. Modern studies unquestionably reveal this reality.
For example, the period of unconditional accumulation is that of childhood (on average located until around the age of 10), popularly delineated by the "seven years at home"... The child does not have the discernment to select the information that receives and accepts it. Moreover, it has been scientifically proven that acceptance is "non-selective" in almost 100% of cases both consciously and unconsciously. It basically seems that there would be no real problems in this "behaviour", that reality is reality and we all accept it unconditionally as a perception but we try to shape it as soon as we have the capacity.
Modern psychological studies tell us something else. Without going into details, think of the children running on the Maidan, dirty, sweaty, dusty in a direct comparison with the "cocoons" of the "educated"! 95% of childhood disorders will be found in "chocolates" who have received (and unfortunately unconsciously assimilated) information about the "harmfulness" of the environment. Subsequently, more than 75% of the adult's diseases will also be found in these "former informed children". Or, reality is one for all and the justifications with different immunity are obviously "childish".
A statement full of "wisdom" like "cleans Mommy's apple peel that no matter how well washed it still has germs" will deprive the child of the vitamin and chemical essence of the whole apple (and this is true for many fruits – for example I can only remember the inner skin of the graft, the inner membranes of walnuts, the skin of tomatoes/tomatoes, grapes, etc. – the most "strident" example is that related to the consumption of garlic which is rapidly assimilated with the smell of "crude" and/ or the peasant and permanently deprives the future individual of its therapeutic power). The clarification I mentioned will form the reality of the future adult who will not return to correcting the error except in very rare cases. But things are much broader...
If 400 years ago you'd told someone about electricity or television or airplanes and cars, not only would they not understand anything but most likely laugh at you or take you to the inquisition. These days these are things so natural that no one makes a case for them anymore. It's changed the generally accepted image of the world, our map of reality, and with it and people's reaction to certain things. However, even today, many of their contemporaries have difficulty imagining that subtle material forces would be real and that they could influence the existence of any man.
But 400 years ago, no one would have doubted that. What else to take into account the fact that the whole human is composed of different parts closely related to each other?!? That changing one element influences the others?!? Even if something in this "direction" happened to each of us. For example, due to a surprising change, a man feels extremely happy and you notice this from his body attitude. His gait is different, his behavior changes, his facial expression, all expressing his great inner joy. Also, a bodily injury can scare his spirit and affect his logical thinking.
The various modern body psychotherapies (bioenergetics, Reiki therapeutics, etc..m etc.) systematically use these relationships for the good of the client.
Going forward, the individual who is more flexible compared to his peers will largely form his environment. If you have set certain attitudes in your relationships with others, you may have certain difficulties. If you convey your instructions only in a command tone, you will determine to individuals who are not accustomed to it, or to those who prefer harmonious forms of communication, the appearance of a form of resistance. Moreover, this will manifest itself on one's own person who will perceive anything outside his own reality as a clear inserency in the way of management, type command to make others like you...
If, however, you fail to set the stubborn ones in motion by submitting your requests in a form that does not allow doubt, when it cannot be otherwise, there will be situations when you cannot handle it. Who can do both things and apply them flexibly, as needed, will be able to solve constructively, with more of those around, more problems. In this way, automatically, he will have more chances to become a leader than others who have limited choice. In addition, acceptance and flexibility can quickly make our individual a landmark an example that can be followed much more easily and securely by others. In conjunction with the above, what would be the consequences of a malability under the conditions of a perceived environment wrongly. The consensus disappears with both one's own person and those around it, and constrictive behaviors that generate conflict in the strongest...
May it be remembered that the vegetative nervous system, also called autonomous, has completely "un-to-place" reactions under the conditions of a perceived environment erroneously, misshapenly shaped by concepts from the period of unconditional assimilation, and even after this unconditionalization?!? Consensuality with the indoor and/ or external environment quickly leads to the accumulation and/ or amplification of conflicts, and thus the problem of unhappiness and/ or disease arises. Or, unhappy, sick people are not finished, if we expand the logic of misinterpretation of the environment. They're just incorrectly using what they can and have at that time of analysis.
It is shown that he who lives in harmony with himself and lovingly accepts all that he represents (both his needs and his weaknesses) is happy and satisfied regardless of the "inconsistency" of his global image of the environment. The one who tries to be another, who maintains his action due to erroneous perceptions of the environment, who denies himself or a certain part of himself, confronts himself and consumes his time and forces in the absurd struggle against his own identity (his own identity that is real and not shaped by more or less conscious concepts).
This is where unhappiness and disease come from. Therefore, people who want to lead a better life, just need to develop understanding of themselves and let things work as they fit, in vibration according to reality and not that shaped by their perceptions. Anyone who tries, for example, to make a career in a profession that does not suit him, wastes his qualities (at best – most of the time it will strengthen the misperception of the environment and the conflicts of multiply and/ or amplify). If they tried to find an activity that would match them, they would get more success, more appreciation, they would do more useful things for themselves and the world, and they would begin to eliminate misperceptions and assimilate the right ones.
Let me also mention here the theories related to the mask and submask (shown extensively in previous posts)?!? May I mention here our soul/spirit with all that attracts?!? There would be things that, at first glance, would further complicate everything...
It should not be understood so far that there is the possibility of blaming previously assimilated misperceptions or the multitude of parameters that arise in any kind of consideration. I stressed that it is very important to make me feel, to adapt. Everyone acts as best they can at the time. You also learned something important and thought, "Oh, my God, if I'd known that then, I wouldn't have made so many mistakes." That's correct. But in order to learn this now, up to that point you had to gather experiences and integrate them into your personality (not to mention the need to correct old "views" or concretely sustainable interests).
Then you just couldn't, and that's why you did some less satisfying things than you could have done right now. In a few years, you'll think alike about what you're doing now. And? We all constantly change, learn, adapt and become more competent. Allow yourself to accept your current capabilities, use them and rejoice that tomorrow you will be able to do the same thing better, because you have decided to learn constantly from what happens to you in life. In a certain context, each action is useful and valuable. Imagine that you constantly express yourself unclear, rarely respect your word, help others make mistakes, avoid acting or never take responsibility.
Maybe now you're thinking, "That would be terrible, who else would want to have anything to do with me!?! No one will take me seriously anymore to progress." This attitude might not be very useful in your environment, but if you were a politician, acting in this way, you would have a bright and promising perspective of ascension (offf, I don't want to refer to current politics, no matter where it manifests itself)... This example may seem too harsh to you, but think of the fact that there are so many life situations, cultures and subcultures that no matter what you do, in at least one situation, it would be good for you to act just as you act at that hypothetical moment, of the example presented...
And so much for our struggle with old and unconditional accumulations (I could find many other details but, my main goal is to get as quickly and understandable as possible to practice and control). Tomorrow I will discuss our choice possibilities both from the existing "dowry" and from what we are at the time "now" considered for any decision and, by implication, subsequent action...
A week full of the good to you and those around you!
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru