STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
Anchors
and their control (2)
Translation Draft
At the end of the previous post I described how to draw up anchor sheets. All of us who will proceed to the realization of these cards will "seize" that they have to do with a real effort of introspection but also with a real effort that will certainly extend over many days (weeks) or more, depending on their "dedication". The main problem that will arise here, however, is time. From experience I tell you that the time that this effort stretches is the main problem.
Some do not have this time because of their "full" life, agitated, suffocated by the demands of life, others do not have this time due to a disease, disease, etc. that requires a rapid response, which does not give way to delays, others do not "dispose" of this time because they do not have the ability, understanding, faith, patience etc. to really get involved and forget or leave the idea of making these cards. Each with their own way of being but, above all, each with their anchors.
And now comes the next problem. These cards are just the beginning. Yes, you read it right: The beginning. From the point of view of those who passed this step, he was the easiest. Anyone who has just come to complete this step will face the "opportunity" to give up by forgetting that they have barely met them, even if they have identified some anchors. It is the moment when you can forget that any analysis performed by a doctor, by a psychologist, by any specialist, requires an effort to introduce, to know the problem. And why not, he's looking at the fact that it's only now that something has been realized that reveals true knowledge about one's own people, knowledge that can be more unpleasant or, at least, unimaginable than you can imagine.
But, let us consider that you have passed this step, that you have at your disposal the "anchor" cards made by you. Now is the time to make some kind of synthesis. Here's what this is all about...
As I was saying, describing, etc., all the problems of our lives arise from conflicts with ourselves and/ or from conflicts with the environment, with those around us. Now, with the anchor sheets at our disposal, we will be able to see that they can be focused on people. This effort is referred to in the literature, stacking effort (beware, it has nothing to do with the anchor stacking technique that is found in NLP - Neuro Linguistic Programming/ Neuro Linguistic Programming and SNLP - Spiritual NLP, which we will discuss later in future posts). So, we're going to start grouping the anchors "detected" on people.
We start first with the most important person, with ourselves. We will do so, to create a kind of own card where we will note everything we identify to be related to ourselves, only and only to ourselves. A simple example is: the first card is that of visual stimuli, let's see!. They are the strongest stimuli, over 70% of the sum of human perceptions "due" to visual perceptions, perhaps that's why it's good to start with it. The order of analysis is well structured according to the VAKOG process. This VAKOG comes from V - visual, A - auditory, Kinesthetic (tactile/ groping/ skin "touching"), O - Olfactory and G - Gustative. Simple... VAKOG.
Now is the time for the first surprises. Starting from you you will notice that human feelings are often (in fact, always) a grouping of stimuli. Reactions to a single stimulus are of relative importance, real, but grouping, multiplying them, significantly increases their importance.
I will now proceed to describe some kind of analysis related to a dramatic event (chosen by chance but "maximized" to be able to discern different levels of gravity and different levels of "anchoring"), which often gives rise to real anchors, essential for some people. For example, the simple thud (and secondary noises - scatterings of materials, the presence of siren noises of police, ambulance, rumbling and shouting "public" that may be present at that accident, etc.) that appear as auditory stimuli (so, without having other sensory perceptions), in the event of a car accident (remote from us) is a simple anchor, something that signals to us that something is wrong , an imminent danger, occurred, with possible implications on us.
But if that accident happens before our eyes, so appearance and visual stimuli, both anchors will amplify the effect on us. From that moment on, any thud of accident will also be associated with the memory of images of accidents, each with the maximum consequences perceived by us, by our experience. As I've said so many times, the subconscious doesn't discern between stimuli, it doesn't give birth to feelings.
In turn, the subconscious also performs this stacking, correlation, evaluation or whatever you want to call it. Subsequently, depending on our experiences, he, like us, that he is only our subconscious, comes to "realize" the severity of an accident only by the mere amplitude of the thud (and the presence of secondary noises that occur), having a kind of preference towards assessing our most "serious" experience.
Why to the "most serious"?!? The whole human system operates according to a principle called by specialists "the stimulus with the greatest biological importance". Any structure will do its best to pay maximum attention to what it considers to be the stimulus with the greatest biological relevance. And from here, it comes to remembering a maximum "perception" and, by implication, remembering, the manifestation of the anchor of maximum importance. But back to the presentation of the "example" and you will understand more!
If this experience includes visual perceptions, obviously, we can already imagine what happened, our "resulting" feelings being greatly amplified. But so far I haven't really achieved personal experience. It is only about anchors related to external persons (new external events or with minimal tangency, where applicable), known or unknown to us (at least in the case of my example).
But in the case of the presence of our person at the scene of an accident, other stimuli appear and everything complicates in the sense of amplifying our perceptions. It is about the appearance (possible occurrence) of kinesthetic stimuli, if we have the "unhappiness" to be forced to give first aid, olfactory represented by odors that occur (smell of fuels, smells of fire, smells of the environment, possibly human odors, if victims or any other associated smells appear) and taste (especially in the case of personal accidents, such as the taste of blood, earth, etc., or , if you give first aid, the remaining taste after performing a mouth-to-mouth breath or the like).
So, from the mere presentation of a suite of stimuli one can notice that everything increases according to the intensity of this accident and, above all, our direct or indirect participation in it. So the anchors that result from this will increase their "strength", manifested by the increasingly strong feelings born by the increase in the stimuli received in connection with them.
And, to all this, we add the mental processes that we perform, their conscious identification, more or less related to reality. For example, it is one thing to see a person, the victim of an accident, tolling on the pains of an open fracture, and another is that that person is you (God save us all from this!!!). The anchors that arise from such an "incident" will be totally different. The one who has only witnessed will have anchors that give rise to feelings of a certain level, the one who has lived the experience directly will have anchors of a whole other level/ amplitude.
Many of those who have had to deal with such an experience often relive a small memory of the pains, feelings, etc. experienced then, every time they hear a simple thud that is born of a simple accident, a simple collision in which they bend/ break a bar/ a spoiler and break a lighthouse. It's all in direct line with the individual's anchor. Then, depending on your participation in such an accident, anchors appear related to the consequences of the accident.
For example, the dialogue with the victim when you give him first aid, his monologue at the dying stage when you try to save her and, last but not least, when he dies "in your arms". Then, I will even be considered cynical, also depending on your participation in such a thing, in the accident example, appear the psychic correlations that arise due to the comments of the "public" to that accident.
From experience I can confirm that you will have to deal with the "waste" of human perception, stuff that will leave deep anchors in your subconscious. When I say waste, I mean lines like ," what was this cow doing at this hour on the crosswalk?" says the author of the accident, pointing to the throbbing body of an 18-year-old girl run over the head, with her brains scattered on the pavement, leaving life in the struggles of suffering... I'd rather stop, but I can't help but remember the next line of the individual: "Fucking bitch, "tread" (the term is different but I can't afford to reproduce it here) was burning them now. No, I stepped on her to break her head."
In this cynical, but more real example than you can imagine, one will be the anchor of the author of the accident (who "took" only 4 years "suspended" - or remember the case of the American who fatally injured a member of the group "Compact") and another will be the anchor of the "public". Similarly, another will be the anchor of the mother of the girl who was groaning, among the passing out, "He came from training, from mathematics", "But, he had to give the Bacul". Another will be the anchor of the paramedics who will note, number or not by their experience "Time of death: 19:10". Another will be the anchor of "members of the public" who comment on the side of the members of the author of the accident: "I saw, jumped in front of the car and was not on the pedestrian crossing" (although the brain debris was leaving right from the middle of the pedestrian crossing towards the end of it)... Deh, I'd better stop. You get the point!
And, we will continue in the next post, addressing a more pleasant example!
At the end of the previous post I described how to draw up anchor sheets. All of us who will proceed to the realization of these cards will "seize" that they have to do with a real effort of introspection but also with a real effort that will certainly extend over many days (weeks) or more, depending on their "dedication". The main problem that will arise here, however, is time. From experience I tell you that the time that this effort stretches is the main problem.
Some do not have this time because of their "full" life, agitated, suffocated by the demands of life, others do not have this time due to a disease, disease, etc. that requires a rapid response, which does not give way to delays, others do not "dispose" of this time because they do not have the ability, understanding, faith, patience etc. to really get involved and forget or leave the idea of making these cards. Each with their own way of being but, above all, each with their anchors.
And now comes the next problem. These cards are just the beginning. Yes, you read it right: The beginning. From the point of view of those who passed this step, he was the easiest. Anyone who has just come to complete this step will face the "opportunity" to give up by forgetting that they have barely met them, even if they have identified some anchors. It is the moment when you can forget that any analysis performed by a doctor, by a psychologist, by any specialist, requires an effort to introduce, to know the problem. And why not, he's looking at the fact that it's only now that something has been realized that reveals true knowledge about one's own people, knowledge that can be more unpleasant or, at least, unimaginable than you can imagine.
But, let us consider that you have passed this step, that you have at your disposal the "anchor" cards made by you. Now is the time to make some kind of synthesis. Here's what this is all about...
As I was saying, describing, etc., all the problems of our lives arise from conflicts with ourselves and/ or from conflicts with the environment, with those around us. Now, with the anchor sheets at our disposal, we will be able to see that they can be focused on people. This effort is referred to in the literature, stacking effort (beware, it has nothing to do with the anchor stacking technique that is found in NLP - Neuro Linguistic Programming/ Neuro Linguistic Programming and SNLP - Spiritual NLP, which we will discuss later in future posts). So, we're going to start grouping the anchors "detected" on people.
We start first with the most important person, with ourselves. We will do so, to create a kind of own card where we will note everything we identify to be related to ourselves, only and only to ourselves. A simple example is: the first card is that of visual stimuli, let's see!. They are the strongest stimuli, over 70% of the sum of human perceptions "due" to visual perceptions, perhaps that's why it's good to start with it. The order of analysis is well structured according to the VAKOG process. This VAKOG comes from V - visual, A - auditory, Kinesthetic (tactile/ groping/ skin "touching"), O - Olfactory and G - Gustative. Simple... VAKOG.
Now is the time for the first surprises. Starting from you you will notice that human feelings are often (in fact, always) a grouping of stimuli. Reactions to a single stimulus are of relative importance, real, but grouping, multiplying them, significantly increases their importance.
I will now proceed to describe some kind of analysis related to a dramatic event (chosen by chance but "maximized" to be able to discern different levels of gravity and different levels of "anchoring"), which often gives rise to real anchors, essential for some people. For example, the simple thud (and secondary noises - scatterings of materials, the presence of siren noises of police, ambulance, rumbling and shouting "public" that may be present at that accident, etc.) that appear as auditory stimuli (so, without having other sensory perceptions), in the event of a car accident (remote from us) is a simple anchor, something that signals to us that something is wrong , an imminent danger, occurred, with possible implications on us.
But if that accident happens before our eyes, so appearance and visual stimuli, both anchors will amplify the effect on us. From that moment on, any thud of accident will also be associated with the memory of images of accidents, each with the maximum consequences perceived by us, by our experience. As I've said so many times, the subconscious doesn't discern between stimuli, it doesn't give birth to feelings.
In turn, the subconscious also performs this stacking, correlation, evaluation or whatever you want to call it. Subsequently, depending on our experiences, he, like us, that he is only our subconscious, comes to "realize" the severity of an accident only by the mere amplitude of the thud (and the presence of secondary noises that occur), having a kind of preference towards assessing our most "serious" experience.
Why to the "most serious"?!? The whole human system operates according to a principle called by specialists "the stimulus with the greatest biological importance". Any structure will do its best to pay maximum attention to what it considers to be the stimulus with the greatest biological relevance. And from here, it comes to remembering a maximum "perception" and, by implication, remembering, the manifestation of the anchor of maximum importance. But back to the presentation of the "example" and you will understand more!
If this experience includes visual perceptions, obviously, we can already imagine what happened, our "resulting" feelings being greatly amplified. But so far I haven't really achieved personal experience. It is only about anchors related to external persons (new external events or with minimal tangency, where applicable), known or unknown to us (at least in the case of my example).
But in the case of the presence of our person at the scene of an accident, other stimuli appear and everything complicates in the sense of amplifying our perceptions. It is about the appearance (possible occurrence) of kinesthetic stimuli, if we have the "unhappiness" to be forced to give first aid, olfactory represented by odors that occur (smell of fuels, smells of fire, smells of the environment, possibly human odors, if victims or any other associated smells appear) and taste (especially in the case of personal accidents, such as the taste of blood, earth, etc., or , if you give first aid, the remaining taste after performing a mouth-to-mouth breath or the like).
So, from the mere presentation of a suite of stimuli one can notice that everything increases according to the intensity of this accident and, above all, our direct or indirect participation in it. So the anchors that result from this will increase their "strength", manifested by the increasingly strong feelings born by the increase in the stimuli received in connection with them.
And, to all this, we add the mental processes that we perform, their conscious identification, more or less related to reality. For example, it is one thing to see a person, the victim of an accident, tolling on the pains of an open fracture, and another is that that person is you (God save us all from this!!!). The anchors that arise from such an "incident" will be totally different. The one who has only witnessed will have anchors that give rise to feelings of a certain level, the one who has lived the experience directly will have anchors of a whole other level/ amplitude.
Many of those who have had to deal with such an experience often relive a small memory of the pains, feelings, etc. experienced then, every time they hear a simple thud that is born of a simple accident, a simple collision in which they bend/ break a bar/ a spoiler and break a lighthouse. It's all in direct line with the individual's anchor. Then, depending on your participation in such an accident, anchors appear related to the consequences of the accident.
For example, the dialogue with the victim when you give him first aid, his monologue at the dying stage when you try to save her and, last but not least, when he dies "in your arms". Then, I will even be considered cynical, also depending on your participation in such a thing, in the accident example, appear the psychic correlations that arise due to the comments of the "public" to that accident.
From experience I can confirm that you will have to deal with the "waste" of human perception, stuff that will leave deep anchors in your subconscious. When I say waste, I mean lines like ," what was this cow doing at this hour on the crosswalk?" says the author of the accident, pointing to the throbbing body of an 18-year-old girl run over the head, with her brains scattered on the pavement, leaving life in the struggles of suffering... I'd rather stop, but I can't help but remember the next line of the individual: "Fucking bitch, "tread" (the term is different but I can't afford to reproduce it here) was burning them now. No, I stepped on her to break her head."
In this cynical, but more real example than you can imagine, one will be the anchor of the author of the accident (who "took" only 4 years "suspended" - or remember the case of the American who fatally injured a member of the group "Compact") and another will be the anchor of the "public". Similarly, another will be the anchor of the mother of the girl who was groaning, among the passing out, "He came from training, from mathematics", "But, he had to give the Bacul". Another will be the anchor of the paramedics who will note, number or not by their experience "Time of death: 19:10". Another will be the anchor of "members of the public" who comment on the side of the members of the author of the accident: "I saw, jumped in front of the car and was not on the pedestrian crossing" (although the brain debris was leaving right from the middle of the pedestrian crossing towards the end of it)... Deh, I'd better stop. You get the point!
And, we will continue in the next post, addressing a more pleasant example!
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru