STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The Human's Story - Points of View (Part
II).
Translation Draft
Let’s continue yesterday’s posting, with the „common evolutionary path” of all animals from fish, reptiles, mammals, reaching humans!
In a kind of end of human structural similarities with fish, we reach another legacy of major importance, a new kind of ears, with a flag (external ear) … Such an ear is not encountered in reptiles but only in the life forms that have an evolutionary walk on the line of mammals … The ear that gives an auditory sensitivity far superior to other forms of life …
But the secret of this sensitivity lies not only in the external flag, typical of mammals but also in the smallest bones of the organism, the hammerhead, the nest and the staircase, present in the middle ear. transmission of tympanic vibration to the nerve structures of transmission and interpretation …
And, surprise, studies regarding the human embryonic development of the middle ear show that initially there is only one bone, as in reptiles …
But, during the development of two „extra-bones” that appear to be part of the maxillary-mandibular area, as part of the „jaw”, they will „rise” in position, anatomically, and, at the moment of birth, are already delimited by „jaw” disconnecting from this, already part of the future middle ear, which is not yet „final” formed (these bones are still cartilaginous, in a process of shrinking, ossifying, replacing, etc.) but relatively functional …
This process is also described in the differentiation of the bones of the hand, the legs, being a similar one, with the normal anatomical specificity … The process whose evolution is „specialized” by the living beings, called by new mammals, for almost 300 million years (what confirmed by numerous fossils from the mammal development tree, the complete delimitation of the „jaw” bones defending 200 million years ago).
And, especially interesting is the fact that, with this separation of the bones of the middle ear, there is a massive increase in the volume of the brain (noticed in a fossil 180 million years ago, in the so-called Hidrocodein species) … Growth was due in first of all the extreme demands required by the environmental conditions, especially aggressive towards the small mammals but also to the perception, interpretation, etc. requirements of the new sense organs …
Only after the catastrophe of 65 million years ago, with the disappearance of the Saurians, will the mammal development be free to what we know and perceive today.
We mentioned, earlier, about the development, the differentiation of the limbs, and we will focus initially on the hands, a significant element in the „isolation” / „delimitation” of the primate man (monkeys).
The hands of man are what allowed all the „requirements” of the members of his evolution to materialize the thoughts and bring the man where he is now, building things, manipulating them, using them. I didn’t stress this pointlessly, especially since, in future posts from the same group, I will describe things that will leave you speechless.
And, keeping the pattern of analysis focused on embryonic development, things get complicated and we need to resort to some „conquests” of genetics.
It all starts from fertilization, from a cell that divides, resulting in two cells, then the two divide and result in four, then there will be 8, 16, 32, etc. Anyone knows that. So, a kind of rule, quite general, of „his 2”, possibly of symmetry …
What the genetics discovered is that the initial division will generate only the undifferentiated stem cells … Until a certain point when a set of „initially distinct” stem cells from these undifferentiated stem cells will be generated …
Well, from these cells, the initial elements of the embryo (head, body, and tail) develop „distinctly”. Further, we have to deal with a new development of stem cells but, this time, they will be relatively differentiated, „being born” „points of differentiated stem development” (which I mentioned earlier in the case of branching differentiation).
To better understand, I will personalize my presentation with the example of developing 6 fingers (palm or plantar, it does not matter) in the embryo, the human fetus.
The human palm has two such initial points (stepped, of course). The first one that will give birth to the stem cells that will form the future body of the palm, which develops from the initial point of grasping the body member that gives rise to stem cells that differentiate in stages, according to the rule presented above, to the „typology” of the bones of the limbs.
This „starting point” will develop undifferentiated stem cells to the approximate shape of a fingerless glove. From here will develop the second „point” that will initiate the development of the fingers … Well, this development point will quickly differentiate into three „branching” points that will „go” further after the rule of doubling …
So, normally, from the beginning, the human palm will have to develop six fingers … But, evolutionarily, from the „ancestral” amphibian-reptiles of the line of mammals that led to humans, the sixth finger has disappeared … But, a genetic remnant has certainly remained …
And thus, the third undifferentiated developmental point, placed somewhere at the base of the future little finger, will be able to develop the „anomaly” of the six fingers, which appears when this „point”, for various reasons, develops an additional finger, after „Doubling rule”, this being possible because on the genetic-evolutionary route there were stages in which „our ancestors” (not regarding humans but to the entire „evolutionary circus”) had six fingers.
Also on the above principle, at certain „interferences”, a section of the „genetic remnants” will activate the development of the „clapping” fingers (especially in the area of the fingers of the lower limbs).
Well, not only does genetics confirm these „findings” but also embryology, being the science that has shown that this mechanism of embryonic development is identical to all life forms, regardless of what they are, worms, insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals … With the normal differentiation of the species but also of the individual …
Yes, it would be something to clarify, although everything seems too „technical” …
I have also mentioned stem cells, undifferentiated stem cells and, of course, this is where the need for further clarification appears.
Imagine the process of splitting the egg from the moment of fertilization! I will not „get you” with meiosis, mitosis, or other cell division stuff. Just imagine!
The sperm is a remnant of the cell, the egg is a whole cell, but the process of division begins with the formation of only two cells in the egg. from the egg and two from the „activating” sperm …
Can these two cells be attributed to any specificity, in the sense that from this cell the liver will develop, for example, and from the other will develop, says the brain?!? Or systemic type assignments, like this, will the bone, or muscular, or digestive system, or another, develop in this cell?!? Not… We have to deal with undifferentiated cells, which cannot be differentiated, identified to receive a certain attribution, do not have a specific one, do they?
And how many undifferentiated cells should be created to form, for example, only the human skeleton (the bone system), which is made up of 208 bones, without taking into account that this number is not always constant, in some people. forming small, extra bones, between the bones of the skull or between the joints of the fingers?!?
How many undifferentiated cells need to be created only for each system of the human body, or for each organ of the human body, without taking into account a constant evolution of the embryo, as described above?!?
But let’s go further along the line of undifferentiated stem cells, to elucidate as much as one particular mechanism!
In-depth studies, carried out over more than 50 years, have revealed that undifferentiated stem cells will develop according to the environment in which they are created and initiate their existence.
In detail, for a better understanding, I will describe an experiment that can be performed in any laboratory specifically for such an experiment. Undifferentiated stem cells will be taken „from a single place”, regardless of their source, regarding placental, bone, neuronal, hepatic, etc.
Well, these undifferentiated stem cells will first be multiplied in specific, neutral environments (for connoisseurs: physiological serum or any other similar type, indicated by the minimum, transport or possibly enriched media), because the quantities that can be the sample is small for the needs of such a study. And, after a relative cellular multiplication, of the mass of stem cells, an optimal quantity of the study will be obtained, which will be divided into at least three parts.
Then, these cell masses will be placed in different culture media. For example, liver extract, bone extract, neuronal, dermal extract, etc. (specific culture media) … What do you think will happen?!?
Yes, you guessed it, each undifferentiated cell group will develop according to the type of environment in which they were placed, regardless of the „sampling source”. Those placed in the muscle extract will become muscle cells, with a specificity given by the characteristics of the culture medium, those placed in the liver extract will become liver cells, etc … I emphasize, even though their initial source was a completely different type of tissue …
But I did not want to stress this fact, but the fact that the „culture” environment dictates what will become the future undifferentiated stem cell.
Obviously, in the human body, the undifferentiated hepatic stem cell, for example, will develop in a „hepatic environment” and, thus, the reason for which it has appeared at this level will be materialized, becoming a component of the respective tissue. A real system, quite simple and efficient, isn’t it?!?
Now comes the „divisions” related to the environment.
Embryonic development takes place in an isolated environment, which has no tangence to the „external environments” of development, to those possible influences, thus ensuring a normal course of embryonic development. But is that so?!?
Genetics, in all specialized works, can be compared to a weapon, and the environment and lifestyle „pull the trigger” … At least in most cases (over 97% of the mass of human individuals) … With the environment we have clarified or, at least, has described some „details”, but what about the lifestyle?!?
Here, at the level of embryonic development, first of all, the mother intervenes, as a functional whole, which „permanently” provides information through her own body, information that cooperates with the genetic information and helps to the „differentiation” boundaries.
Then, undoubtedly, comes the mother’s lifestyle … Right or not?!? For those who raise questions, I remind them of mothers who consume alcohol or other „risk” drugs, of mothers who have a destructive lifestyle, of mothers who evolve in particularly aggressive environments, and other environments that bring ” question marks ”and needs for adaptation.
Such as, for example, an environment that offers very poor dietary support … Or, starting with logic, for example, only from mothers who use streptomycin during pregnancy and will seriously affect the future baby’s teeth, or from mothers who have an invasive presence (eg spirochetes) …
Things that have nothing to do with genetics, what would be „stored” in the mother’s DNA, possibly in what was received from the father …
Do you think the few examples presented will not affect embryonic development?!? Especially since we did not take into account, for example, the massive radio presence of our times, through all the mobile networks, through all the wifi networks and the like …
Then there would be the psychological component of the mother … Yes, you read correctly, the mother and by no means the embryo, the future individual … Earlier I presented to you the mechanism of the development of the fingers. Well, in a study by American researchers, it is right on only 630 cases, it was found that there is a direct connection between the psychology of the mother and the appearance of the palmed fingers at the feet of the babies born by them.
The result of this study shows that, in 90% of cases, the mother had a strong phobia towards the water, she not knowing how to swim and everything that can be correlated with fear, fear of water, deep or not … So a significant percentage what can explain a kind of insertion of the psychological in the development of the embryo, the fetus, and, finally, the child to be born …
Maybe they are just coincidences, but the percentage is so high.
From the creationists, it is simple …
The man was made of divinity, the only problem being only „an extra coast”, and ready! Everything perfect, without any consideration to the evidence of embryonic development, to the little „evidence” of darkness planted in what would be fossils and the like …
There is only one possible evolution: The sin of the parents is transferred to the genes as well as to the child, to the future child … As punishment for parents who do not follow the divine rules, even if the question is asked „What is the fault of the child ?!” … Or, if the parents are without sin, the sins of the genealogical line come, no matter how deep, until their Adam and Eve … Offf, so what I’m talking about, there is no man without sin …
These creationists are so preoccupied with finding guilt, a sin, that has drawn the punishment in this life, that the poor God remains clear without the object of work, the judgment, be it and the „hereafter”. the calculation that they are mocking the work of God, attributing its imperfection right from the beginning of any evaluation through dogma and its main manifestation, bigotry …
So any form of analysis, on the topic discussed above, to which creationism can be connected, falls from the beginning. Or to point out that not even the Divine Power was able to do everything in one day?!? Or should I point out that man „works” according to „relatively” the same principles as animals, being born, living, dying, forming family, social groups, etc?!?
And I think that is enough with this beginning part of the posts related to „The story of a man”, but I will not go on without drawing and drawing some conclusions …
So, before actually moving on to the „study” of hominids that came to „Homo Sapiens”, I came to a kind of preliminary conclusion (there will be other conclusions): It was to be a kind of „God Bang” or a „Big Bang”, it matters less because there are clear „evolutionary” similarities in both cases.
The ideas of the creationists may be only poorly reproduced in religious books, as one day of Divine Power can be that time that scientists measure using Plank time. More specifically, that this 6th day, of human creation, is unimaginably long, like 50 million years, or less, but much larger than one day?!?
Perhaps the long life span of the people from „The Beginning” contradicts such a hypothesis … So, over time, we are done.
But, the most important part of this conclusion is that the Divine nature or power proceeded gradually, evolutionarily, like a biologist, engineer, etc., going step by step, in an obvious „path of perfection”, a process that is found in this at any point in any direction the research would be oriented.
A path of improvement, of permanent development for the better, for the more adapted … With the successes, be they imperfect, the present living beings, in front of Homo Sapiens or with the failed ones, close to the species that have died out …
Or, as the creationists assert, a reverse path, from divine creation, perfect or near-perfect, on a course of regression and degradation, without the participation of divinity, to the Lord Jesus (or Mahomed, Buddha, etc.)…
So, the conclusion, for evolutionists nature has perfected continuously, the Divine Power has created and the „creation” itself has been degraded continuously … Or are they just „words” meaningless?!?
Anyway, it is about evolution, that it takes place from the creation of the „God Bang” type or that it takes place progressively, from the „Big Bang” to the writing of biblical Genesis.
The second conclusion is obvious: Regardless of the source, evolution is common to all beings, it is certain, regardless of its meaning!
And I won’t go into more detail …
There will now be a kind of analysis similar to what would be the „palpable” man, the one created by the hands of divine power or the one who evolved from the monkey to Homo Sapiens, looking at everything from both points of view …
Love, Gratitude, and Understanding (Namaste)!
Let’s continue yesterday’s posting, with the „common evolutionary path” of all animals from fish, reptiles, mammals, reaching humans!
In a kind of end of human structural similarities with fish, we reach another legacy of major importance, a new kind of ears, with a flag (external ear) … Such an ear is not encountered in reptiles but only in the life forms that have an evolutionary walk on the line of mammals … The ear that gives an auditory sensitivity far superior to other forms of life …
But the secret of this sensitivity lies not only in the external flag, typical of mammals but also in the smallest bones of the organism, the hammerhead, the nest and the staircase, present in the middle ear. transmission of tympanic vibration to the nerve structures of transmission and interpretation …
And, surprise, studies regarding the human embryonic development of the middle ear show that initially there is only one bone, as in reptiles …
But, during the development of two „extra-bones” that appear to be part of the maxillary-mandibular area, as part of the „jaw”, they will „rise” in position, anatomically, and, at the moment of birth, are already delimited by „jaw” disconnecting from this, already part of the future middle ear, which is not yet „final” formed (these bones are still cartilaginous, in a process of shrinking, ossifying, replacing, etc.) but relatively functional …
This process is also described in the differentiation of the bones of the hand, the legs, being a similar one, with the normal anatomical specificity … The process whose evolution is „specialized” by the living beings, called by new mammals, for almost 300 million years (what confirmed by numerous fossils from the mammal development tree, the complete delimitation of the „jaw” bones defending 200 million years ago).
And, especially interesting is the fact that, with this separation of the bones of the middle ear, there is a massive increase in the volume of the brain (noticed in a fossil 180 million years ago, in the so-called Hidrocodein species) … Growth was due in first of all the extreme demands required by the environmental conditions, especially aggressive towards the small mammals but also to the perception, interpretation, etc. requirements of the new sense organs …
Only after the catastrophe of 65 million years ago, with the disappearance of the Saurians, will the mammal development be free to what we know and perceive today.
We mentioned, earlier, about the development, the differentiation of the limbs, and we will focus initially on the hands, a significant element in the „isolation” / „delimitation” of the primate man (monkeys).
The hands of man are what allowed all the „requirements” of the members of his evolution to materialize the thoughts and bring the man where he is now, building things, manipulating them, using them. I didn’t stress this pointlessly, especially since, in future posts from the same group, I will describe things that will leave you speechless.
And, keeping the pattern of analysis focused on embryonic development, things get complicated and we need to resort to some „conquests” of genetics.
It all starts from fertilization, from a cell that divides, resulting in two cells, then the two divide and result in four, then there will be 8, 16, 32, etc. Anyone knows that. So, a kind of rule, quite general, of „his 2”, possibly of symmetry …
What the genetics discovered is that the initial division will generate only the undifferentiated stem cells … Until a certain point when a set of „initially distinct” stem cells from these undifferentiated stem cells will be generated …
Well, from these cells, the initial elements of the embryo (head, body, and tail) develop „distinctly”. Further, we have to deal with a new development of stem cells but, this time, they will be relatively differentiated, „being born” „points of differentiated stem development” (which I mentioned earlier in the case of branching differentiation).
To better understand, I will personalize my presentation with the example of developing 6 fingers (palm or plantar, it does not matter) in the embryo, the human fetus.
The human palm has two such initial points (stepped, of course). The first one that will give birth to the stem cells that will form the future body of the palm, which develops from the initial point of grasping the body member that gives rise to stem cells that differentiate in stages, according to the rule presented above, to the „typology” of the bones of the limbs.
This „starting point” will develop undifferentiated stem cells to the approximate shape of a fingerless glove. From here will develop the second „point” that will initiate the development of the fingers … Well, this development point will quickly differentiate into three „branching” points that will „go” further after the rule of doubling …
So, normally, from the beginning, the human palm will have to develop six fingers … But, evolutionarily, from the „ancestral” amphibian-reptiles of the line of mammals that led to humans, the sixth finger has disappeared … But, a genetic remnant has certainly remained …
And thus, the third undifferentiated developmental point, placed somewhere at the base of the future little finger, will be able to develop the „anomaly” of the six fingers, which appears when this „point”, for various reasons, develops an additional finger, after „Doubling rule”, this being possible because on the genetic-evolutionary route there were stages in which „our ancestors” (not regarding humans but to the entire „evolutionary circus”) had six fingers.
Also on the above principle, at certain „interferences”, a section of the „genetic remnants” will activate the development of the „clapping” fingers (especially in the area of the fingers of the lower limbs).
Well, not only does genetics confirm these „findings” but also embryology, being the science that has shown that this mechanism of embryonic development is identical to all life forms, regardless of what they are, worms, insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals … With the normal differentiation of the species but also of the individual …
Yes, it would be something to clarify, although everything seems too „technical” …
I have also mentioned stem cells, undifferentiated stem cells and, of course, this is where the need for further clarification appears.
Imagine the process of splitting the egg from the moment of fertilization! I will not „get you” with meiosis, mitosis, or other cell division stuff. Just imagine!
The sperm is a remnant of the cell, the egg is a whole cell, but the process of division begins with the formation of only two cells in the egg. from the egg and two from the „activating” sperm …
Can these two cells be attributed to any specificity, in the sense that from this cell the liver will develop, for example, and from the other will develop, says the brain?!? Or systemic type assignments, like this, will the bone, or muscular, or digestive system, or another, develop in this cell?!? Not… We have to deal with undifferentiated cells, which cannot be differentiated, identified to receive a certain attribution, do not have a specific one, do they?
And how many undifferentiated cells should be created to form, for example, only the human skeleton (the bone system), which is made up of 208 bones, without taking into account that this number is not always constant, in some people. forming small, extra bones, between the bones of the skull or between the joints of the fingers?!?
How many undifferentiated cells need to be created only for each system of the human body, or for each organ of the human body, without taking into account a constant evolution of the embryo, as described above?!?
But let’s go further along the line of undifferentiated stem cells, to elucidate as much as one particular mechanism!
In-depth studies, carried out over more than 50 years, have revealed that undifferentiated stem cells will develop according to the environment in which they are created and initiate their existence.
In detail, for a better understanding, I will describe an experiment that can be performed in any laboratory specifically for such an experiment. Undifferentiated stem cells will be taken „from a single place”, regardless of their source, regarding placental, bone, neuronal, hepatic, etc.
Well, these undifferentiated stem cells will first be multiplied in specific, neutral environments (for connoisseurs: physiological serum or any other similar type, indicated by the minimum, transport or possibly enriched media), because the quantities that can be the sample is small for the needs of such a study. And, after a relative cellular multiplication, of the mass of stem cells, an optimal quantity of the study will be obtained, which will be divided into at least three parts.
Then, these cell masses will be placed in different culture media. For example, liver extract, bone extract, neuronal, dermal extract, etc. (specific culture media) … What do you think will happen?!?
Yes, you guessed it, each undifferentiated cell group will develop according to the type of environment in which they were placed, regardless of the „sampling source”. Those placed in the muscle extract will become muscle cells, with a specificity given by the characteristics of the culture medium, those placed in the liver extract will become liver cells, etc … I emphasize, even though their initial source was a completely different type of tissue …
But I did not want to stress this fact, but the fact that the „culture” environment dictates what will become the future undifferentiated stem cell.
Obviously, in the human body, the undifferentiated hepatic stem cell, for example, will develop in a „hepatic environment” and, thus, the reason for which it has appeared at this level will be materialized, becoming a component of the respective tissue. A real system, quite simple and efficient, isn’t it?!?
Now comes the „divisions” related to the environment.
Embryonic development takes place in an isolated environment, which has no tangence to the „external environments” of development, to those possible influences, thus ensuring a normal course of embryonic development. But is that so?!?
Genetics, in all specialized works, can be compared to a weapon, and the environment and lifestyle „pull the trigger” … At least in most cases (over 97% of the mass of human individuals) … With the environment we have clarified or, at least, has described some „details”, but what about the lifestyle?!?
Here, at the level of embryonic development, first of all, the mother intervenes, as a functional whole, which „permanently” provides information through her own body, information that cooperates with the genetic information and helps to the „differentiation” boundaries.
Then, undoubtedly, comes the mother’s lifestyle … Right or not?!? For those who raise questions, I remind them of mothers who consume alcohol or other „risk” drugs, of mothers who have a destructive lifestyle, of mothers who evolve in particularly aggressive environments, and other environments that bring ” question marks ”and needs for adaptation.
Such as, for example, an environment that offers very poor dietary support … Or, starting with logic, for example, only from mothers who use streptomycin during pregnancy and will seriously affect the future baby’s teeth, or from mothers who have an invasive presence (eg spirochetes) …
Things that have nothing to do with genetics, what would be „stored” in the mother’s DNA, possibly in what was received from the father …
Do you think the few examples presented will not affect embryonic development?!? Especially since we did not take into account, for example, the massive radio presence of our times, through all the mobile networks, through all the wifi networks and the like …
Then there would be the psychological component of the mother … Yes, you read correctly, the mother and by no means the embryo, the future individual … Earlier I presented to you the mechanism of the development of the fingers. Well, in a study by American researchers, it is right on only 630 cases, it was found that there is a direct connection between the psychology of the mother and the appearance of the palmed fingers at the feet of the babies born by them.
The result of this study shows that, in 90% of cases, the mother had a strong phobia towards the water, she not knowing how to swim and everything that can be correlated with fear, fear of water, deep or not … So a significant percentage what can explain a kind of insertion of the psychological in the development of the embryo, the fetus, and, finally, the child to be born …
Maybe they are just coincidences, but the percentage is so high.
From the creationists, it is simple …
The man was made of divinity, the only problem being only „an extra coast”, and ready! Everything perfect, without any consideration to the evidence of embryonic development, to the little „evidence” of darkness planted in what would be fossils and the like …
There is only one possible evolution: The sin of the parents is transferred to the genes as well as to the child, to the future child … As punishment for parents who do not follow the divine rules, even if the question is asked „What is the fault of the child ?!” … Or, if the parents are without sin, the sins of the genealogical line come, no matter how deep, until their Adam and Eve … Offf, so what I’m talking about, there is no man without sin …
These creationists are so preoccupied with finding guilt, a sin, that has drawn the punishment in this life, that the poor God remains clear without the object of work, the judgment, be it and the „hereafter”. the calculation that they are mocking the work of God, attributing its imperfection right from the beginning of any evaluation through dogma and its main manifestation, bigotry …
So any form of analysis, on the topic discussed above, to which creationism can be connected, falls from the beginning. Or to point out that not even the Divine Power was able to do everything in one day?!? Or should I point out that man „works” according to „relatively” the same principles as animals, being born, living, dying, forming family, social groups, etc?!?
And I think that is enough with this beginning part of the posts related to „The story of a man”, but I will not go on without drawing and drawing some conclusions …
So, before actually moving on to the „study” of hominids that came to „Homo Sapiens”, I came to a kind of preliminary conclusion (there will be other conclusions): It was to be a kind of „God Bang” or a „Big Bang”, it matters less because there are clear „evolutionary” similarities in both cases.
The ideas of the creationists may be only poorly reproduced in religious books, as one day of Divine Power can be that time that scientists measure using Plank time. More specifically, that this 6th day, of human creation, is unimaginably long, like 50 million years, or less, but much larger than one day?!?
Perhaps the long life span of the people from „The Beginning” contradicts such a hypothesis … So, over time, we are done.
But, the most important part of this conclusion is that the Divine nature or power proceeded gradually, evolutionarily, like a biologist, engineer, etc., going step by step, in an obvious „path of perfection”, a process that is found in this at any point in any direction the research would be oriented.
A path of improvement, of permanent development for the better, for the more adapted … With the successes, be they imperfect, the present living beings, in front of Homo Sapiens or with the failed ones, close to the species that have died out …
Or, as the creationists assert, a reverse path, from divine creation, perfect or near-perfect, on a course of regression and degradation, without the participation of divinity, to the Lord Jesus (or Mahomed, Buddha, etc.)…
So, the conclusion, for evolutionists nature has perfected continuously, the Divine Power has created and the „creation” itself has been degraded continuously … Or are they just „words” meaningless?!?
Anyway, it is about evolution, that it takes place from the creation of the „God Bang” type or that it takes place progressively, from the „Big Bang” to the writing of biblical Genesis.
The second conclusion is obvious: Regardless of the source, evolution is common to all beings, it is certain, regardless of its meaning!
And I won’t go into more detail …
There will now be a kind of analysis similar to what would be the „palpable” man, the one created by the hands of divine power or the one who evolved from the monkey to Homo Sapiens, looking at everything from both points of view …
Love, Gratitude, and Understanding (Namaste)!
Dorin, Merticaru