STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
Anchors
and their control (3)
Translation Draft
Let's move on, this time with a more pleasant example than the one in yesterday's post!
I'm not going back to describe what VAKOG means (you'll find details in yesterday's post). We will now "analyze" the case of a lover (a lover). Compared to the anchors in the painful example in yesterday's post, in addition to the "cleanliness" of the state of love "intervene" anchors of the most painful possible... Paradoxical... Why?!?
This thing with the lover (not to be confused with love, with love) is based on anchors of the most subtle, most difficult to control, identify, etc. These anchors are formed in direct relation to something so subconscious that it certainly holds unconsciously (in a more esoteric language, of the soul). Starting from this level, of the unconscious, unmodeled and "hardly modelable" by us in any particular way, we come to have strange perceptions of immediate sympathy (or antipathy) towards a person, from the earliest ages (with the advance of age come the other anchors and the predominance of the unconscious passes where we all know that they are, at the level of the subconscious). From this point of view, of the unconscious, I will stop cautiously (as always) at this level.
The medical world (with particular reference to psychologists) builds around the primary manifestations of the condition, something related to love and "love" a whole suite of approaches. The simplest, most obvious, is that the ideal of a partner is most often, the one like the face of the mother or father (each with his adhesion) but also of his behavior (from yesterday's post I hope you have noted that strong anchors are reinforced by "collaboration", overlap, related deductible action, etc. - I do not want to go into details). So, to the idea of the face, you must add the voice, the smell, the caresses, the taste immediately associated with the presence of that person. Everything forms a heterogeneous whole that we will call an anchor (logically, there are several but, for simplicity, we will refer to one).
From this point of view "maternal" or "paternal", future perceptions, tangents with children and people around us, begin to slowly shape our ideal presence, the one that we will fall in love with later. To the ideal face begin to add, to "blur", all kinds of VAKOG components and, of course, psychological interpretation so that, at some point, depending on other anchors, instincts, etc. will occur "explosion". At first shy, with feelings easily assimilated with imitation, then increasingly prominent manifests as a kind of internal requirement, impossible to stop (to anchors will add desires, ambitions, hormones, etc.) strengthening the effect of manifestation of anchors, "complicating them". And, internal consumption, subconscious psychic overload become so great that you end up giving up everything that previously represented you (or, of course, exacerbating to the unbearable).
And it's time to be in love for the first time. For a neutral observer with some real training, the time has come to unleash the manifestations of existing anchors. To make it seem even more complicated, love takes over not only our minds, but also our bodies. When we're in love, our heart rate goes crazy, we feel like we have a lump in our stomach, and the mood changes from one second to the next. So, new anchors... Now, a new study comes to show that all these symptoms are determined by the psyche, with its palpable manifestations at the cerebral level.
Studies by scientists have recently used MRI in particular to monitor the brain activity of women and men who have declared themselves "deeply in love." All participants were involved in relationships, the duration of which varied from one month to almost two years, and those who did not share love were taken into account and were simply in love with one person. When participants were shown pictures of their loved one, it was observed that emotional responses were recorded in an area involved in motivation and reward. Experts explained that intense and passionate love uses the same system in the brain that activates in the case of drug addiction.
Or, over time, all our anchors have "focused" precisely on this area, of motivation and reward, being the only "indication" of functionality that the anchors know, therefore, implicitly the subconscious that manages these anchors. Like I said, the subconscious doesn't know what's right or wrong. Confirmation of his "response" choices is given precisely by the cerebral "translator" present in this area of motivation and reward (including in the case of what can be called a negative answer, something bad), this translation being an essential element for survival, helping us to figure out when something is right or something is wrong. So, we can say that the anchors anchor even more strongly in this area that translates to the subconscious what the effect of its reactions is. Let's move on!
Over time, experts have declared that passionate love is one of the most intense emotions a man can try. yes, that's right... The pains, however great, will give rise to emotions of conditioning, many new reflexes. The human brain is programmed to choose a partner (life, business, play, etc.), which is why some of us are ready to make crazy gestures to receive the attention and affection of the chosen person, in the case of the lover, which is why some of us let ourselves be trampled, too often literally, by their friends, by those whom they adore... And the examples can go on.
After learning how the brain reacts under the influence of love, scientists have wondered if love and its reaction lasts over time. To find out, the specialists conducted another study, on married subjects, with marriages lasting an average of 21 years. Thus it was found that in the case of these people there are changes in the brain when they look at images of the person they love. The difference is that long-term love produces activity in the parts of the brain associated with attachment and reward. The conclusion was swift, for most people, long relationships produce a gradual decrease in passionate love, but an increase in their ability to stay with the person they love.
In other words, as long as love exists, people get used to the relationship, and the fear of being left disappears. In this context, most people no longer focus on ways to maintain partner interest. In addition, it has been determined that the lover, dominated by a passionate love, arrives quickly due to the intensity of feelings to tire, literally, in addition to a protective effect of the body adapting to the intensity of stimuli, manifested by a habit with their current level. Thus, the individual begins to perceive that stimuli of the same intensity as the previous ones produce less reward, less arousal, less motivation, effect that becomes important with the passage of time. So the effect is inevitable, the disappearance of passionate love, the "departure" of the lover and the "arrival" of the attachment (the escape of the one who cannot be a partner or the arrival of the true partner).
During this period of passage, anchors end up being defining for the possible "continuity of the existing relationship". If the anchors are dominant "passionate", depriving one of the partners of their manifestation will attract an effort of resistance by requesting from the other partner to support the "missing" anchors. When I say missing, I mean the balance of motivation-reward that appears in passionate love, in love and the attachment-reward that appears in the partner. An example of this being that of the wife or husband who no longer participates in the "sexual presence" (courtship, coquettishness, etc.) with motivating effect (care of appearance, wearing underwear, erotic games, etc.) with effect, you guessed it, motivating and thus appears the first imbalance.
If this imbalance is not "remedied" periodically, the sense of continuity, of normality of the sexual game will quickly attract the "fall" of these activities from motivation in attachment. It doesn't seem like a big deal, but in reality it's completely different thanks, you guessed it again, to the anchors. Attachment is a kind of reflex, a normal thing that does not require stimuli but is subject to permanent adaptation of the body. Thus, in a longer or shorter time, sexual activities carried out under the "empire" of attachment end up diminishing the sexual experience until, quite simply, sexual presence. And that's it. Or, with something like that, you can no longer talk about sex life but just about acoupling, even total, at least from a partner's point of view. But what about the anchors?!? They will be the ones that will be the basis of other motivations, because they were born associated with motivation, with the values of passion, far superior as "burns" of the attachment.
This is how adultery occurs, this is how the "specificities" of expression of sexual activities with negatively expressed effect occur, especially through perversions, aggressive acts, etc. This is the reason that will easily overcome any attachment, any morals, ethics, existence and requirements of children... The anchors related to sexuality, possessiveness, obedience, etc. that have developed in the period of passion, characteristic of the downloads and manifestations of feelings of these periods, of "love" will be those that will guide in the shadows all defeats or victories that will follow. For example, the "fighting" behavior of a boss can trigger strong anchors "fixed" in various periods of sentimental "effort" and thus appear an unusual obedience, which can go, under favorable conditions, to sexual obedience... And, enough with all these examples!
Attention, I think it's good to point this out. Let it not be understood from all the above arguments that I am predominantly Freudian! I can give many other examples that have nothing to do with sexuality. And, as I've outlined in previous posts, Adler and Jung have staked out many other determinisms that underlie massive downloads of feelings that can easily be associated with something to become anchors or simply trigger the manifestation of existing anchors...
And with all that presented in yesterday's post and today I think we have made everyone understand the effect of the anchors and especially why it is necessary to identify and "process" them where appropriate. So tomorrow, we will continue with their identification and processing.
Let's move on, this time with a more pleasant example than the one in yesterday's post!
I'm not going back to describe what VAKOG means (you'll find details in yesterday's post). We will now "analyze" the case of a lover (a lover). Compared to the anchors in the painful example in yesterday's post, in addition to the "cleanliness" of the state of love "intervene" anchors of the most painful possible... Paradoxical... Why?!?
This thing with the lover (not to be confused with love, with love) is based on anchors of the most subtle, most difficult to control, identify, etc. These anchors are formed in direct relation to something so subconscious that it certainly holds unconsciously (in a more esoteric language, of the soul). Starting from this level, of the unconscious, unmodeled and "hardly modelable" by us in any particular way, we come to have strange perceptions of immediate sympathy (or antipathy) towards a person, from the earliest ages (with the advance of age come the other anchors and the predominance of the unconscious passes where we all know that they are, at the level of the subconscious). From this point of view, of the unconscious, I will stop cautiously (as always) at this level.
The medical world (with particular reference to psychologists) builds around the primary manifestations of the condition, something related to love and "love" a whole suite of approaches. The simplest, most obvious, is that the ideal of a partner is most often, the one like the face of the mother or father (each with his adhesion) but also of his behavior (from yesterday's post I hope you have noted that strong anchors are reinforced by "collaboration", overlap, related deductible action, etc. - I do not want to go into details). So, to the idea of the face, you must add the voice, the smell, the caresses, the taste immediately associated with the presence of that person. Everything forms a heterogeneous whole that we will call an anchor (logically, there are several but, for simplicity, we will refer to one).
From this point of view "maternal" or "paternal", future perceptions, tangents with children and people around us, begin to slowly shape our ideal presence, the one that we will fall in love with later. To the ideal face begin to add, to "blur", all kinds of VAKOG components and, of course, psychological interpretation so that, at some point, depending on other anchors, instincts, etc. will occur "explosion". At first shy, with feelings easily assimilated with imitation, then increasingly prominent manifests as a kind of internal requirement, impossible to stop (to anchors will add desires, ambitions, hormones, etc.) strengthening the effect of manifestation of anchors, "complicating them". And, internal consumption, subconscious psychic overload become so great that you end up giving up everything that previously represented you (or, of course, exacerbating to the unbearable).
And it's time to be in love for the first time. For a neutral observer with some real training, the time has come to unleash the manifestations of existing anchors. To make it seem even more complicated, love takes over not only our minds, but also our bodies. When we're in love, our heart rate goes crazy, we feel like we have a lump in our stomach, and the mood changes from one second to the next. So, new anchors... Now, a new study comes to show that all these symptoms are determined by the psyche, with its palpable manifestations at the cerebral level.
Studies by scientists have recently used MRI in particular to monitor the brain activity of women and men who have declared themselves "deeply in love." All participants were involved in relationships, the duration of which varied from one month to almost two years, and those who did not share love were taken into account and were simply in love with one person. When participants were shown pictures of their loved one, it was observed that emotional responses were recorded in an area involved in motivation and reward. Experts explained that intense and passionate love uses the same system in the brain that activates in the case of drug addiction.
Or, over time, all our anchors have "focused" precisely on this area, of motivation and reward, being the only "indication" of functionality that the anchors know, therefore, implicitly the subconscious that manages these anchors. Like I said, the subconscious doesn't know what's right or wrong. Confirmation of his "response" choices is given precisely by the cerebral "translator" present in this area of motivation and reward (including in the case of what can be called a negative answer, something bad), this translation being an essential element for survival, helping us to figure out when something is right or something is wrong. So, we can say that the anchors anchor even more strongly in this area that translates to the subconscious what the effect of its reactions is. Let's move on!
Over time, experts have declared that passionate love is one of the most intense emotions a man can try. yes, that's right... The pains, however great, will give rise to emotions of conditioning, many new reflexes. The human brain is programmed to choose a partner (life, business, play, etc.), which is why some of us are ready to make crazy gestures to receive the attention and affection of the chosen person, in the case of the lover, which is why some of us let ourselves be trampled, too often literally, by their friends, by those whom they adore... And the examples can go on.
After learning how the brain reacts under the influence of love, scientists have wondered if love and its reaction lasts over time. To find out, the specialists conducted another study, on married subjects, with marriages lasting an average of 21 years. Thus it was found that in the case of these people there are changes in the brain when they look at images of the person they love. The difference is that long-term love produces activity in the parts of the brain associated with attachment and reward. The conclusion was swift, for most people, long relationships produce a gradual decrease in passionate love, but an increase in their ability to stay with the person they love.
In other words, as long as love exists, people get used to the relationship, and the fear of being left disappears. In this context, most people no longer focus on ways to maintain partner interest. In addition, it has been determined that the lover, dominated by a passionate love, arrives quickly due to the intensity of feelings to tire, literally, in addition to a protective effect of the body adapting to the intensity of stimuli, manifested by a habit with their current level. Thus, the individual begins to perceive that stimuli of the same intensity as the previous ones produce less reward, less arousal, less motivation, effect that becomes important with the passage of time. So the effect is inevitable, the disappearance of passionate love, the "departure" of the lover and the "arrival" of the attachment (the escape of the one who cannot be a partner or the arrival of the true partner).
During this period of passage, anchors end up being defining for the possible "continuity of the existing relationship". If the anchors are dominant "passionate", depriving one of the partners of their manifestation will attract an effort of resistance by requesting from the other partner to support the "missing" anchors. When I say missing, I mean the balance of motivation-reward that appears in passionate love, in love and the attachment-reward that appears in the partner. An example of this being that of the wife or husband who no longer participates in the "sexual presence" (courtship, coquettishness, etc.) with motivating effect (care of appearance, wearing underwear, erotic games, etc.) with effect, you guessed it, motivating and thus appears the first imbalance.
If this imbalance is not "remedied" periodically, the sense of continuity, of normality of the sexual game will quickly attract the "fall" of these activities from motivation in attachment. It doesn't seem like a big deal, but in reality it's completely different thanks, you guessed it again, to the anchors. Attachment is a kind of reflex, a normal thing that does not require stimuli but is subject to permanent adaptation of the body. Thus, in a longer or shorter time, sexual activities carried out under the "empire" of attachment end up diminishing the sexual experience until, quite simply, sexual presence. And that's it. Or, with something like that, you can no longer talk about sex life but just about acoupling, even total, at least from a partner's point of view. But what about the anchors?!? They will be the ones that will be the basis of other motivations, because they were born associated with motivation, with the values of passion, far superior as "burns" of the attachment.
This is how adultery occurs, this is how the "specificities" of expression of sexual activities with negatively expressed effect occur, especially through perversions, aggressive acts, etc. This is the reason that will easily overcome any attachment, any morals, ethics, existence and requirements of children... The anchors related to sexuality, possessiveness, obedience, etc. that have developed in the period of passion, characteristic of the downloads and manifestations of feelings of these periods, of "love" will be those that will guide in the shadows all defeats or victories that will follow. For example, the "fighting" behavior of a boss can trigger strong anchors "fixed" in various periods of sentimental "effort" and thus appear an unusual obedience, which can go, under favorable conditions, to sexual obedience... And, enough with all these examples!
Attention, I think it's good to point this out. Let it not be understood from all the above arguments that I am predominantly Freudian! I can give many other examples that have nothing to do with sexuality. And, as I've outlined in previous posts, Adler and Jung have staked out many other determinisms that underlie massive downloads of feelings that can easily be associated with something to become anchors or simply trigger the manifestation of existing anchors...
And with all that presented in yesterday's post and today I think we have made everyone understand the effect of the anchors and especially why it is necessary to identify and "process" them where appropriate. So tomorrow, we will continue with their identification and processing.
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru