STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The
Language of the Subconscious (2)
Translation Draft
In the previous post I announced that I would treat the language of dreams but, before doing so, it is good to delineate what is meant by this term, from the "language of dreams".
To the great disappointment of several readers, who have had the opportunity to contact me by phone (several friends and "contacts" directly to my life here), there will be an web surfer approach, to the formation of a kind of dictionary of dreams explained, annotated or the like. And here's why!
First of all because each of us has to do with our own reality/conscious, with our own subconscious, with our own unconscious. I will "take" all these "phases" one at a time, in reverse (with the stipulation that you do not have to accept what I type next but simply go through).
For readers of my entire blog, even the latest posts, the unconscious is bound by me (more precisely, by researchers of any specialty that I have assimilated and accepted) as being related to spirit, astral angels, earthlings, wise men, spirits, etc. So, different stages of perception (value, ability to interpret, experiences, etc.), location (Terrians, Pleiadeians, Osirians, Orionians, Arcturians, etc.), structure (humanoids, reptilians, insectoids, energetics, etc.), etc. (I do not go into other details).
Thus, for each, "something" has a different value (given by the landmarks, different reference points, etc.), another interpretation (given by different values, different symbols, different ability to accept and translate the peculiarities/ "metaphors", etc.), etc., etc., etc. All these differences will give rise to different "possibilities" of communication and thus of perception/reception of something by the upper "layers". Then, the subconscious, the bridge between unconscious and conscious is the "place" where everything is assimilated without any interpretation, without any kind of translation, without any kind of evaluation, without any kind of involvement, blah, blah, blah.
It is, effectively, an interface and a storage medium (well, for connoisseurs, it's all a link to the storage environment, but for our objective reality it seems to be the storage medium, and I stop here). That's it, and nothing more. From all these "details" it just follows that, I will quickly move on.
Consciousness, relatively, is the translation, the expression of the sum between unconscious and subconscious, uncontrollable, often impossible to translate/interpret. Therefore, uncontrolled dreams (emphasis, unchecked, and you will see further why) are nothing more than a manifestation of the two "layers" that will be reflected in a conscious perception that will be nothing but a kind of attempt at translation (rarely successful).
For example, an unconscious "demon" where the spirit knows that there is no death/purpose, mistake or other conscious "aberrations" can only represent a dialogue with an entity with "other material manifestation".
To "customize" surf the internet and search for the image of a mite, for example, to see how "photogenic" it is. For those with a "weaker" knowledge, he will constitute perceptively as a true demon that inspires horror, if he reaches the layers that can be "touched" by the conscious. And to continue the previous example, to build something "familiar" that creates a kind of comfort, the human mind (or the intervention of the "mite") will build something, a kind of building, in which to achieve dialogue with our "mite". At the level of tangency with the conscious, the building can quickly become a house haunted by that demon. But let me stop here because You can literally create distortions of perception (it's enough what I described). So the unconscious does something and the "tangence" to the conscious something else. Why is that?
Simple, because the subconscious intervenes, without taking into account what's to come about the conscious. The subconscious is the interface, the neutral place, absolutely neutral. Only if we consider this neutrality and "all-knowing" (so we necessarily eliminate the unconscious) of everything we have perceived during our lifetime here, here are the problems that will arise!
Specialized studies of any rank and hierarchy have established that the subconscious-conscious ensemble "works" according to the principle of reconstitution. Let's see, first, what this principle is! The human mind (forced only to the subconscious-conscious) is permanently bombarded with thousands and thousands of stimuli, with thousands and thousands of signals. For this reason it cannot pay attention to all these signals, be they thoughts (because, contrary to expectations, thoughts are constantly manifested but not fully perceived at the conscious level) but is obliged to pay attention only to those with relevance, to the "important".
Moreover, the human mind (I will no longer point out further that I refer to the subconscious-conscious ensemble, with the forced elimination of the unconscious), works in advance. It, even if it receives a snippet of information, based on what is "stored", will attempt to provide the complete, previously prepared image for a given conscious situation (of that reference moment). This anticipatory, reconstitution reaction is not a fad but a deep evolutionary principle "stuck" including in our genes (DNA, RNA).
To be more explicit, I'll give an example. Once upon a time, in the days when primitive man was "shaking" in forests where, in the vast majority of cases, he was hunting, he needed time to react to be able to "get rid" of more gifted, hunted aggressors. Therefore, he, the primitive man, had to be able to reconstruct reality only "receiving" a smell, hearing a noise, sensing a trace of the ear that emerges from the hemhes where the predator was crounched, on the prowl. Receiving these signals he reconstituted reality and was simply able to supplement these signals with the real image of the predator that quickly formed in another suite of re-enactments of reality that were "stored" in his mind.
Some ran away as fast as they could trying to escape, others, not knowing that the predator could climb trees/trees, were obviously trying to climb, escape, not knowing that they were becoming "safe prey", others knew what to do in the trees and broke a thick branch to hit, possibly down, the hunter who was going to climb the tree/tree after them and other reasonings, reconstructions of a possible future reality. The case can be "extrapolated" in our times, obviously, even if the intensity of the stimuli no longer has the same values. Some of us will enter the chief's office, with an error made in their subordinate work, and will notice that he is frowned upon, so he enters into the need to have a reaction.
Their mind, by simply sensing the position of the eyebrows and the forehead, reconstructs the image of the "angry boss" (don't forget the substrate), without noticing that the sun is beating exactly on his face and he is frowned upon because of this. What comes next, each of us will re-enact, according to the availability of his mind. It is something similar, for example, to the operation of search engines (google or the like). They rummage through the internet environment, accumulate information about any material they have the scheduled ability to index and, at a user's request, they provide a response.
But this answer often has nothing to do with reality, being a response given by a database, being a response given by the selection rules of the "search root" that will select the answer. It is impossible that some of us search engine users did not receive the reply that "This page does not exist", although the list presented gave it in response to the search. So here's how we're dealing with an answer that's based on a previous, stored reality that tries to anticipate real, immediate reality. And, enough with these examples, who wants to understand has already understood, who does not, can not and ready!
So we return to our home and demon (to the logical line of my speech in this post). Before we have the "dreams" that brought us here, the general substrate appears before we have those dreams. Thus, before our conscious mind perceives the demon and the house, it has a repository of fresh sentimental experiences. They will give pre-emptive "meaning" (before all other considerations) to all reconstructions to be made. I will not go into the details related to the unconscious (related to the demon) and his effort of communication (creating a familiar environment). At the moment we will only stop at the subconscious and the translation, the tangency, the conscious.
The last sentimental (not necessarily affective) experiences are usually the most intense, most topical for the subconscious. But this "usually" occurs because the human individual may have a sum of such sentimental experiences that clearly exceed any more current perception. This is about feelings "exercised" over time through the practice of evaluation, projection, etc. when each of us makes various plans, reacts intensely and over time to something, and many, many more. We no longer take into account ambitions, frustrations and the like that constantly give rise, over time, to this practice of the presence and manifestation of feelings that may become prevalent and be pre-emtively relevant to immediate experiences, for example, of the current day, before having those dreams.
So, as a result of these simple considerations, we come to the possibility of "building" that house in the form of a friend's house, the boss's house (whether or not we have ever been there - the important thing is that we assimilate it as something that is "boss's house" or friend's). We can even perceive the road up there, in significant, multiple, real or not details. Now it's the demon's turn. He can show up on the road, coming out of a bush that happens to be there. Some assimilate everything with fear, surprise and impossibility of assimilating the gesture of the "demon" exit from the bushes and will try to flee or enter into dialogue or struggle.
Danger or support, initiative or obedience... The reactions of the "demon" as well as the protagonist will give the temptation of nightmare or something else of the dream, of the translation of the amount of projected perceptions that have reached the conscious. And, for example, the "demon" may be the wrongly chosen representation of an energy contact entity that just wanted to send a useful message. At the level of the subconscious (no longer take into account the fundamental level, at the unconscious) it is impossible to break any rule because they, the rules, do not exist. They are built adaptively, permanently "associated" with the moment. Maybe, that's why in the dream we can fly without problems, we can be immune to fire or the like.
The basic rules of the unconscious imply the inviolability of free will and no entity will ever have any power over us unless we allow it. So, that "demon" was allowed in but he chose the wrong path or we misinterpreted it based on what we had stored at the subconscious level. And, speculation on this can continue, but I don't think that's the case anymore...
And the details can go on but I've made myself clear about the adventure of interpreting uncontrolled dreams and why it's essentially mandatory for each of us to have the capacity for introspection, for analysis, to interpret our own dreams. Thus, each of us can identify a premonitor dream, which is nothing but a proper analysis and awareness of the parameters unzipped and analyzed from the subconscious. Thus, each of us will know why he is "visited" by a relative or friend who left this dimension (died) and sent a certain message or simply said "goodbye" (or goodbye).
And the examples could go on. And, why not, so, we will be able to avoid the trap of book offers or internet materials related to the interpretation of dreams (Not all but the vast majority, YES) and our anchoring in something that has nothing to do with ourselves, or worse, that will influence us in a completely different direction from the useful one/ necessary for our path in this dimension...
OK, that's it! You understand that interpreting uncontrolled dreams is not my goal. The technique of visual imaging (or multisensory, each with its own capacity), of visual (or multisensory) theatre is the basis of our "collaboration" with the subconscious, in the most unfortunate case, and/ or with the unconscious, in the happy case. This will "debate" during future posts, preparing all the techniques of practice and control that will be described later. Thank you for your understanding!
In the previous post I announced that I would treat the language of dreams but, before doing so, it is good to delineate what is meant by this term, from the "language of dreams".
To the great disappointment of several readers, who have had the opportunity to contact me by phone (several friends and "contacts" directly to my life here), there will be an web surfer approach, to the formation of a kind of dictionary of dreams explained, annotated or the like. And here's why!
First of all because each of us has to do with our own reality/conscious, with our own subconscious, with our own unconscious. I will "take" all these "phases" one at a time, in reverse (with the stipulation that you do not have to accept what I type next but simply go through).
For readers of my entire blog, even the latest posts, the unconscious is bound by me (more precisely, by researchers of any specialty that I have assimilated and accepted) as being related to spirit, astral angels, earthlings, wise men, spirits, etc. So, different stages of perception (value, ability to interpret, experiences, etc.), location (Terrians, Pleiadeians, Osirians, Orionians, Arcturians, etc.), structure (humanoids, reptilians, insectoids, energetics, etc.), etc. (I do not go into other details).
Thus, for each, "something" has a different value (given by the landmarks, different reference points, etc.), another interpretation (given by different values, different symbols, different ability to accept and translate the peculiarities/ "metaphors", etc.), etc., etc., etc. All these differences will give rise to different "possibilities" of communication and thus of perception/reception of something by the upper "layers". Then, the subconscious, the bridge between unconscious and conscious is the "place" where everything is assimilated without any interpretation, without any kind of translation, without any kind of evaluation, without any kind of involvement, blah, blah, blah.
It is, effectively, an interface and a storage medium (well, for connoisseurs, it's all a link to the storage environment, but for our objective reality it seems to be the storage medium, and I stop here). That's it, and nothing more. From all these "details" it just follows that, I will quickly move on.
Consciousness, relatively, is the translation, the expression of the sum between unconscious and subconscious, uncontrollable, often impossible to translate/interpret. Therefore, uncontrolled dreams (emphasis, unchecked, and you will see further why) are nothing more than a manifestation of the two "layers" that will be reflected in a conscious perception that will be nothing but a kind of attempt at translation (rarely successful).
For example, an unconscious "demon" where the spirit knows that there is no death/purpose, mistake or other conscious "aberrations" can only represent a dialogue with an entity with "other material manifestation".
To "customize" surf the internet and search for the image of a mite, for example, to see how "photogenic" it is. For those with a "weaker" knowledge, he will constitute perceptively as a true demon that inspires horror, if he reaches the layers that can be "touched" by the conscious. And to continue the previous example, to build something "familiar" that creates a kind of comfort, the human mind (or the intervention of the "mite") will build something, a kind of building, in which to achieve dialogue with our "mite". At the level of tangency with the conscious, the building can quickly become a house haunted by that demon. But let me stop here because You can literally create distortions of perception (it's enough what I described). So the unconscious does something and the "tangence" to the conscious something else. Why is that?
Simple, because the subconscious intervenes, without taking into account what's to come about the conscious. The subconscious is the interface, the neutral place, absolutely neutral. Only if we consider this neutrality and "all-knowing" (so we necessarily eliminate the unconscious) of everything we have perceived during our lifetime here, here are the problems that will arise!
Specialized studies of any rank and hierarchy have established that the subconscious-conscious ensemble "works" according to the principle of reconstitution. Let's see, first, what this principle is! The human mind (forced only to the subconscious-conscious) is permanently bombarded with thousands and thousands of stimuli, with thousands and thousands of signals. For this reason it cannot pay attention to all these signals, be they thoughts (because, contrary to expectations, thoughts are constantly manifested but not fully perceived at the conscious level) but is obliged to pay attention only to those with relevance, to the "important".
Moreover, the human mind (I will no longer point out further that I refer to the subconscious-conscious ensemble, with the forced elimination of the unconscious), works in advance. It, even if it receives a snippet of information, based on what is "stored", will attempt to provide the complete, previously prepared image for a given conscious situation (of that reference moment). This anticipatory, reconstitution reaction is not a fad but a deep evolutionary principle "stuck" including in our genes (DNA, RNA).
To be more explicit, I'll give an example. Once upon a time, in the days when primitive man was "shaking" in forests where, in the vast majority of cases, he was hunting, he needed time to react to be able to "get rid" of more gifted, hunted aggressors. Therefore, he, the primitive man, had to be able to reconstruct reality only "receiving" a smell, hearing a noise, sensing a trace of the ear that emerges from the hemhes where the predator was crounched, on the prowl. Receiving these signals he reconstituted reality and was simply able to supplement these signals with the real image of the predator that quickly formed in another suite of re-enactments of reality that were "stored" in his mind.
Some ran away as fast as they could trying to escape, others, not knowing that the predator could climb trees/trees, were obviously trying to climb, escape, not knowing that they were becoming "safe prey", others knew what to do in the trees and broke a thick branch to hit, possibly down, the hunter who was going to climb the tree/tree after them and other reasonings, reconstructions of a possible future reality. The case can be "extrapolated" in our times, obviously, even if the intensity of the stimuli no longer has the same values. Some of us will enter the chief's office, with an error made in their subordinate work, and will notice that he is frowned upon, so he enters into the need to have a reaction.
Their mind, by simply sensing the position of the eyebrows and the forehead, reconstructs the image of the "angry boss" (don't forget the substrate), without noticing that the sun is beating exactly on his face and he is frowned upon because of this. What comes next, each of us will re-enact, according to the availability of his mind. It is something similar, for example, to the operation of search engines (google or the like). They rummage through the internet environment, accumulate information about any material they have the scheduled ability to index and, at a user's request, they provide a response.
But this answer often has nothing to do with reality, being a response given by a database, being a response given by the selection rules of the "search root" that will select the answer. It is impossible that some of us search engine users did not receive the reply that "This page does not exist", although the list presented gave it in response to the search. So here's how we're dealing with an answer that's based on a previous, stored reality that tries to anticipate real, immediate reality. And, enough with these examples, who wants to understand has already understood, who does not, can not and ready!
So we return to our home and demon (to the logical line of my speech in this post). Before we have the "dreams" that brought us here, the general substrate appears before we have those dreams. Thus, before our conscious mind perceives the demon and the house, it has a repository of fresh sentimental experiences. They will give pre-emptive "meaning" (before all other considerations) to all reconstructions to be made. I will not go into the details related to the unconscious (related to the demon) and his effort of communication (creating a familiar environment). At the moment we will only stop at the subconscious and the translation, the tangency, the conscious.
The last sentimental (not necessarily affective) experiences are usually the most intense, most topical for the subconscious. But this "usually" occurs because the human individual may have a sum of such sentimental experiences that clearly exceed any more current perception. This is about feelings "exercised" over time through the practice of evaluation, projection, etc. when each of us makes various plans, reacts intensely and over time to something, and many, many more. We no longer take into account ambitions, frustrations and the like that constantly give rise, over time, to this practice of the presence and manifestation of feelings that may become prevalent and be pre-emtively relevant to immediate experiences, for example, of the current day, before having those dreams.
So, as a result of these simple considerations, we come to the possibility of "building" that house in the form of a friend's house, the boss's house (whether or not we have ever been there - the important thing is that we assimilate it as something that is "boss's house" or friend's). We can even perceive the road up there, in significant, multiple, real or not details. Now it's the demon's turn. He can show up on the road, coming out of a bush that happens to be there. Some assimilate everything with fear, surprise and impossibility of assimilating the gesture of the "demon" exit from the bushes and will try to flee or enter into dialogue or struggle.
Danger or support, initiative or obedience... The reactions of the "demon" as well as the protagonist will give the temptation of nightmare or something else of the dream, of the translation of the amount of projected perceptions that have reached the conscious. And, for example, the "demon" may be the wrongly chosen representation of an energy contact entity that just wanted to send a useful message. At the level of the subconscious (no longer take into account the fundamental level, at the unconscious) it is impossible to break any rule because they, the rules, do not exist. They are built adaptively, permanently "associated" with the moment. Maybe, that's why in the dream we can fly without problems, we can be immune to fire or the like.
The basic rules of the unconscious imply the inviolability of free will and no entity will ever have any power over us unless we allow it. So, that "demon" was allowed in but he chose the wrong path or we misinterpreted it based on what we had stored at the subconscious level. And, speculation on this can continue, but I don't think that's the case anymore...
And the details can go on but I've made myself clear about the adventure of interpreting uncontrolled dreams and why it's essentially mandatory for each of us to have the capacity for introspection, for analysis, to interpret our own dreams. Thus, each of us can identify a premonitor dream, which is nothing but a proper analysis and awareness of the parameters unzipped and analyzed from the subconscious. Thus, each of us will know why he is "visited" by a relative or friend who left this dimension (died) and sent a certain message or simply said "goodbye" (or goodbye).
And the examples could go on. And, why not, so, we will be able to avoid the trap of book offers or internet materials related to the interpretation of dreams (Not all but the vast majority, YES) and our anchoring in something that has nothing to do with ourselves, or worse, that will influence us in a completely different direction from the useful one/ necessary for our path in this dimension...
OK, that's it! You understand that interpreting uncontrolled dreams is not my goal. The technique of visual imaging (or multisensory, each with its own capacity), of visual (or multisensory) theatre is the basis of our "collaboration" with the subconscious, in the most unfortunate case, and/ or with the unconscious, in the happy case. This will "debate" during future posts, preparing all the techniques of practice and control that will be described later. Thank you for your understanding!
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru