STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The
Language of the Subconscious (6)
Translation Draft
Here we are at the post that needs to complete the "primary" approach to subconscious language. From everything we have gone through so far, the first "perceptions" that appear can be "classified" as emotions, the following, much more complex, "composed" of a sum of emotions, are feelings and finally, thoughts appear (which are also represented by dreams, uncontrolled or controlled).
Let's start with the emotions. An emotion is motivation in pure form, it is the message that goes directly from the subconscious to act, finally, at the level of the conscious. A first role of emotions is to let us know when our needs are not met and to motivate us to act to meet them. Their "formation" is not yet well "discovered" but it seems that they represent a direct reaction of the autonomic nervous system (vegetative nervous system - sympathetic and parasympathetic) in which also participates nerve formations considered "upper level" but acting "basal" in the selective sense (selection of these messages) and in the sense of transmission for processing (to other higher levels, which are conscious).
So, in some ways, all emotions have a positive purpose, being the messages given by the structures of the subconscious (to which we can easily include the unconscious, as we have defined it/ described in previous posts) in order to cause us to act in a certain sense, in order to overcome a certain situation that "appears" in certain "prints" as non-compliant, necessary to be corrected. For example: anger is an emotion that tells us that we perceive a particular situation or action as incorrect towards us. This emotion motivates us to act to remedy the situation and restore fairness.
Guilt is an emotion that tells us that we perceive a situation where we are not fair to another person (or to ourselves). It motivates us to act to restore fairness, to rehabilitate ourselves from that person and, more often than not, "ask for punishment" on a conscious or subconscious level. But just as well, a sum of these two emotions (or any other kind of grouping of emotions) can occur from somewhere, from the vegetative nervous system, constituting feelings such as, for example, in the case of angina, which, without an associative reason, gives rise to emotions (and/ or feelings) perceived by the conscious without being able to locate the cause that lies in the subconscious (the amount of anger and guilt that acts for a particularly long time and attracts organic problems that lead to the appearance of angina - but about it in future posts).
So, we came to feelings and deduced in a "primary" way what might be the cause of them (the joint action of one or more emotions). So, feelings are the physical expression of the emotions we experience, they are the physical reaction of the body (not to be considered only the body disjunct from the brain) in response to that emotion generated by the subconscious. Continuing with the examples above, anger causes, for example, increased heart rate, muscle contraction (under the action of the vegetative nervous system, through its sympathetic component, which controls "fight or run" reactions), etc., preparing the body for an action, for a conscious reaction.
Why did I point out at the end of the previous statement "for a conscious reaction"? Because the conscious does not take into account the majority of emotions and, implicitly, the feelings that arise from their accumulation because they do not consider a reaction appropriate. Yes, it's hard to accept, but even though we all have emotions and feelings, we're so little aware of them because control of our consciousness comes in. For the accuracy of the information I can't help but quote from the results of the researchers who "tell" us that most people live their lives without awareness of 80-90% of the emotions and, by implication, the feelings they experience.
Moreover, it is equally interesting and another aspect: although we are aware of a small part of our emotions and feelings, we often do not "listen to the message" that we receive or misunderstand. In this case we are dealing with a "conscious" way of working with emotions/feelings, that of distracting ourselves from these emotions using an element that temporarily captures our attention, that "anesthetizes" us emotionally, such as smoking, overeating, overwork, etc. (without taking into account the justifications we use when we are already sick and "eliminate" emotional/sentimental perceptions by associating them with the idea of "symptoms of the disease"). So we suppress these emotions/feelings within ourselves, forbidding interference in the conscious, and every time we feel "negative emotion", we use the element of distraction and generate through repetition a behavior that is often harmful.
From previous posts it is not hard to remember the repetition that can lead to "rewriting" the subconscious. In the same sense, you probably remember the concept of Pavlovian conditioning that I mentioned in previous posts, with the "help" of which we manage to "program" habits, in this case negative.
But when we distract ourselves when we feel an unpleasant emotion (feelings with unpleasant result), we do as in the case of allopathic medicine, treating only one symptom (or more), not the cause that generates that emotion/feeling. And the cause of that emotion (that feeling) is the necessity that we have unsatisfied. For example: sadness tells us that we have lost something or someone we love and we need to regain what we have lost or replace the loss with something equivalent. As long as we do not act to meet this need, there is not enough food or alcohol to solve this cause/ problem/ need. We'll feel better eating a chocolate, for example, but after a short time we'll need another chocolate to "self-medicate" and the "I feel sad – Eat a chocolate" cycle will continue at the expense of the silhouette (or at the expense of health).
But things don't stop there. At some point, after I fall into the trap of "I feel sad – I eat a chocolate", there is a secondary feeling of frustration because what we do only brings us results in the short term. Besides, we're going to need a new wardrobe. The more we continue to distract ourselves using chocolate, the greater the frustration. We eat more and more often without any positive results. But the frustration and extra pounds will continue to increase. And remember, that's only if we stick to the silhouette! if we consider only "secondary" health problems, or those related to the way of integration into the relational environment, things are complicated even by simply attracting new competing emotions and feelings.
Continuing logic on the previous example, the secondary feeling of frustration also has a message: it tells us that we have to do something else because what we have done before has not brought any results. It tells us that we're going in the wrong direction and that we should do something else to satisfy the emotion we're feeling. Then, when frustration peaks, a tertiary feeling emerges: depression. Depression, in this case, acts as an overpressure valve: at this point it saves us from a self-destructive situation and currently suspends the feeling we suppress by eating chocolate. We don't feel sad anymore, we feel depressed.
Of course, the feeling of sadness reappears after a while and the cycle resumes: sadness – distraction – frustration – depression. The tertiary feeling of depression tells us "give up, you hurt yourself way too much if you keep doing what you've done so far." When our repeated efforts to resolve emotion are doomed to failure, frustration becomes stronger than the hope of getting out of the situation. We're starting to feel like there's no point in trying again. We feel hopeless and the lack of hope leads to inaction, motivation disappears and depression occurs. Thus depression can be considered at the opposite pole of hope – a message of helplessness and passivity. Hope and depression are mutually exclusive, they can't coexist.
It is important to realize, when we want to understand emotions/feelings, that we have two possibilities, two emotional states: either we are in a state where we have a satisfied need, a state that we perceive emotionally pleasing, or we are in a state where we do not have that need satisfied and then we suffer emotionally.
So it would take a way to understand the message of emotions/feelings and use them to our advantage. Starting from the synthesis performed "on individuals" (individuals) of your life (starting, of course from your own person), after using anchor sheets, we will now come to the delimitation of emotions/feelings.
At the moment I will proceed to a kind of informative description of this step because, first of all, it is necessary to know exactly where we stand with the language of the conscious, the one who achieves the translation of everything we can consciously do. Therefore, the process is extremely simple and has 3 stages: 1. identification/appointment of emotion/feeling (which you did "involuntarily" when you identified the anchors); 2. identifying the cause that generated the feeling (what you did as "involuntarily" when you assigned people to the anchors discovered); and 3. finding a satisfactory response – an action that satisfies the need that produced that feeling (this last "operation" must first really be understood and there are many more posts before we get there). But to satisfy some curiosity of the moment, I present below a list of emotions/feelings and the corresponding need indicated by that feeling:
Boredom – the need to develop, to have challenges to overcome;
Anger – the need to have fairness, both for ourselves and for others (attention, this is about the actual feeling, without the discovery of a particular cause, about emotion/ instinctive feeling that is unrelated and, by implication, results from a conscious, planned activity);
Guilt – the need to be fair to others or to one's own person;
Sadness – the need to have important things or relationships of value to us;
Loneliness – the need to have relations with our fellow human beings;
Inadequacy/ Inadequacence – the need to feel good enough to achieve something;
Stress – the need to be successful and control in all aspects of our lives;
Fear – the need for safety;
Frustration – the need to have satisfaction in our actions;
Depression – the need to have hope.
So the first step is to identify the feeling. It is often difficult to identify a feeling especially because we are not used to analyzing our feelings or have learned to suppress them. Some authors say that the secret of success is attention and exercise to "listen to the inner voice of emotion/feeling". When it is difficult to identify emotion/feeling we can proceed to step 2 – identifying the cause – and thus we can find the emotion/feeling corresponding. But from my point of view (and the authors I've achieved), identifying anchors is a kind of clarification and identification, performed even unknowingly of the emotions/feelings that are behind the "behind" of words and/ or concrete, identifiable perception of emotions/feelings.
Step 2, which is the identification of the cause, is the very one related to people who gave birth to the emotions/feelings identified or not (taking into account, first of all, your own person). It is only when we know exactly what causes the feeling that we will be able to find the solution, the action necessary to meet the need we have.
And in a kind of "unending" ending, because our life continues, manifests itself constantly, will follow step 3: "finding" and applying a satisfactory response. When we satisfy the need we completely eliminate the cause that generates emotion/feeling and at the same time we eliminate the possibility of recurrence of feeling.
Obviously, so far, we've only taken into account feelings that seem to have negative influences, those that have a requirement to be controlled, possibly eliminated. Let us not forget for a moment that they come directly from the subconscious, that something of our existence that does not differentiate between good and evil. For him (as for us), everything has its purpose and any emotion/feeling is good, they are beneficial, they are a direct reaction to what our conscious does for or against their manifestations but obviously in the idea of giving rise to adaptation to unconscious or conscious requirements.
Finally, but only for information purposes, I will exemplify the primary process of this procedure, using anger (anger) as a feeling. When we perceive a circumstance as unfair to ourselves or those closest to us, we feel angry. Anger motivates us to act to restore the correctness of that situation. And, we have two possibilities to act: we can act in a destructive way by doing something that would endanger us or others (physical or verbal violence or other ineffective action, in most cases - often guilt will arise that attracts, in a vicious circle anger, due to the "relocation" of injustice), or we can act in a creative way by finding and implementing solutions that can solve the situation in a positive way. Every time we experience the feeling of anger, we experience the fear that arises from the perception that the situation could be dangerous. Anger thus reveals the fears we have in a certain circumstance. Because this feeling arises from our perceptions it is extremely important to carry out a reality check: "Is this situation really unfair? Or is my perception incorrect?"
If we find a supporting component throughout the situation, the pressure generated by the feeling of anger will be greatly reduced. Therefore, the previous steps will be completed with the new steps represented by: 1. reality check, 2. if the situation is indeed incorrect, then we must act appropriately to remedy this; and 3. if there is nothing we can do to bring fairness to that situation, then forgiveness is the solution. Then often there is nothing we can do for a situation that has occurred in the past. However, this situation can cause us suffering: "We live in the light of our reflected actions of the past. All the things we've done in the past, we're still doing in the present, in our minds, because of the subconscious that recorded everything and reacting to any future action based on "existing records."
In most of the techniques that I will present over time, the last possible action (although it is indicated, depending on your ability to understand and act to be the first) is forgiveness, "became" the antidote that gives us the release of harmful, repressed, stifled feelings within us. These feelings continue to make us suffer and make us perform those harmful actions of distracting us (using food, harmful substances or actions that we later regret).
There's something else I need to point out. The process of forgiveness is based on the consideration that: forgiveness is for the one who forgives, not for the wrongdoer (the offender, the "wrongdoer"). If we decide to forgive we will be the only beneficiaries of forgiveness: we free ourselves from the negative feelings, from the emotional pressure we have accumulated as a result of the past. We realize that as long as we do not forgive, the person who has hurt us will continue to hurt us ("... the things we have done in the past we continue to do in our minds"). To forgive does not mean to forget the events that have happened (especially subconsciously), it does not mean to find an excuse for the person who has hurt us (whether that person is ourselves). Intelligence involves learning from our mistakes. Forgetting that experience leads to ignorance. And the reasoning can continue...
So, concluding, the first step in this attempt of mine to present what will follow is to find and apply a satisfactory, adaptive response, etc. (of course after I made the effort to first identify anchors, then to "position them on people"). And, this is followed/described by 1. reality check, 2. if the situation is indeed incorrect, then we must act appropriately to remedy this; and 3. if there is nothing we can do to bring fairness to that situation, then forgiveness is the solution.
So, for now, checking reality is what follows. But for this, we first need to know the language of the conscious (which I will begin to post when the time is right - with the will of the Lord of our God - I feel crushed by fatigue for a few days now). From tomorrow I'll move on to the concrete nuance of everything I can about the language of the unconscious... Thanks for understanding!
Here we are at the post that needs to complete the "primary" approach to subconscious language. From everything we have gone through so far, the first "perceptions" that appear can be "classified" as emotions, the following, much more complex, "composed" of a sum of emotions, are feelings and finally, thoughts appear (which are also represented by dreams, uncontrolled or controlled).
Let's start with the emotions. An emotion is motivation in pure form, it is the message that goes directly from the subconscious to act, finally, at the level of the conscious. A first role of emotions is to let us know when our needs are not met and to motivate us to act to meet them. Their "formation" is not yet well "discovered" but it seems that they represent a direct reaction of the autonomic nervous system (vegetative nervous system - sympathetic and parasympathetic) in which also participates nerve formations considered "upper level" but acting "basal" in the selective sense (selection of these messages) and in the sense of transmission for processing (to other higher levels, which are conscious).
So, in some ways, all emotions have a positive purpose, being the messages given by the structures of the subconscious (to which we can easily include the unconscious, as we have defined it/ described in previous posts) in order to cause us to act in a certain sense, in order to overcome a certain situation that "appears" in certain "prints" as non-compliant, necessary to be corrected. For example: anger is an emotion that tells us that we perceive a particular situation or action as incorrect towards us. This emotion motivates us to act to remedy the situation and restore fairness.
Guilt is an emotion that tells us that we perceive a situation where we are not fair to another person (or to ourselves). It motivates us to act to restore fairness, to rehabilitate ourselves from that person and, more often than not, "ask for punishment" on a conscious or subconscious level. But just as well, a sum of these two emotions (or any other kind of grouping of emotions) can occur from somewhere, from the vegetative nervous system, constituting feelings such as, for example, in the case of angina, which, without an associative reason, gives rise to emotions (and/ or feelings) perceived by the conscious without being able to locate the cause that lies in the subconscious (the amount of anger and guilt that acts for a particularly long time and attracts organic problems that lead to the appearance of angina - but about it in future posts).
So, we came to feelings and deduced in a "primary" way what might be the cause of them (the joint action of one or more emotions). So, feelings are the physical expression of the emotions we experience, they are the physical reaction of the body (not to be considered only the body disjunct from the brain) in response to that emotion generated by the subconscious. Continuing with the examples above, anger causes, for example, increased heart rate, muscle contraction (under the action of the vegetative nervous system, through its sympathetic component, which controls "fight or run" reactions), etc., preparing the body for an action, for a conscious reaction.
Why did I point out at the end of the previous statement "for a conscious reaction"? Because the conscious does not take into account the majority of emotions and, implicitly, the feelings that arise from their accumulation because they do not consider a reaction appropriate. Yes, it's hard to accept, but even though we all have emotions and feelings, we're so little aware of them because control of our consciousness comes in. For the accuracy of the information I can't help but quote from the results of the researchers who "tell" us that most people live their lives without awareness of 80-90% of the emotions and, by implication, the feelings they experience.
Moreover, it is equally interesting and another aspect: although we are aware of a small part of our emotions and feelings, we often do not "listen to the message" that we receive or misunderstand. In this case we are dealing with a "conscious" way of working with emotions/feelings, that of distracting ourselves from these emotions using an element that temporarily captures our attention, that "anesthetizes" us emotionally, such as smoking, overeating, overwork, etc. (without taking into account the justifications we use when we are already sick and "eliminate" emotional/sentimental perceptions by associating them with the idea of "symptoms of the disease"). So we suppress these emotions/feelings within ourselves, forbidding interference in the conscious, and every time we feel "negative emotion", we use the element of distraction and generate through repetition a behavior that is often harmful.
From previous posts it is not hard to remember the repetition that can lead to "rewriting" the subconscious. In the same sense, you probably remember the concept of Pavlovian conditioning that I mentioned in previous posts, with the "help" of which we manage to "program" habits, in this case negative.
But when we distract ourselves when we feel an unpleasant emotion (feelings with unpleasant result), we do as in the case of allopathic medicine, treating only one symptom (or more), not the cause that generates that emotion/feeling. And the cause of that emotion (that feeling) is the necessity that we have unsatisfied. For example: sadness tells us that we have lost something or someone we love and we need to regain what we have lost or replace the loss with something equivalent. As long as we do not act to meet this need, there is not enough food or alcohol to solve this cause/ problem/ need. We'll feel better eating a chocolate, for example, but after a short time we'll need another chocolate to "self-medicate" and the "I feel sad – Eat a chocolate" cycle will continue at the expense of the silhouette (or at the expense of health).
But things don't stop there. At some point, after I fall into the trap of "I feel sad – I eat a chocolate", there is a secondary feeling of frustration because what we do only brings us results in the short term. Besides, we're going to need a new wardrobe. The more we continue to distract ourselves using chocolate, the greater the frustration. We eat more and more often without any positive results. But the frustration and extra pounds will continue to increase. And remember, that's only if we stick to the silhouette! if we consider only "secondary" health problems, or those related to the way of integration into the relational environment, things are complicated even by simply attracting new competing emotions and feelings.
Continuing logic on the previous example, the secondary feeling of frustration also has a message: it tells us that we have to do something else because what we have done before has not brought any results. It tells us that we're going in the wrong direction and that we should do something else to satisfy the emotion we're feeling. Then, when frustration peaks, a tertiary feeling emerges: depression. Depression, in this case, acts as an overpressure valve: at this point it saves us from a self-destructive situation and currently suspends the feeling we suppress by eating chocolate. We don't feel sad anymore, we feel depressed.
Of course, the feeling of sadness reappears after a while and the cycle resumes: sadness – distraction – frustration – depression. The tertiary feeling of depression tells us "give up, you hurt yourself way too much if you keep doing what you've done so far." When our repeated efforts to resolve emotion are doomed to failure, frustration becomes stronger than the hope of getting out of the situation. We're starting to feel like there's no point in trying again. We feel hopeless and the lack of hope leads to inaction, motivation disappears and depression occurs. Thus depression can be considered at the opposite pole of hope – a message of helplessness and passivity. Hope and depression are mutually exclusive, they can't coexist.
It is important to realize, when we want to understand emotions/feelings, that we have two possibilities, two emotional states: either we are in a state where we have a satisfied need, a state that we perceive emotionally pleasing, or we are in a state where we do not have that need satisfied and then we suffer emotionally.
So it would take a way to understand the message of emotions/feelings and use them to our advantage. Starting from the synthesis performed "on individuals" (individuals) of your life (starting, of course from your own person), after using anchor sheets, we will now come to the delimitation of emotions/feelings.
At the moment I will proceed to a kind of informative description of this step because, first of all, it is necessary to know exactly where we stand with the language of the conscious, the one who achieves the translation of everything we can consciously do. Therefore, the process is extremely simple and has 3 stages: 1. identification/appointment of emotion/feeling (which you did "involuntarily" when you identified the anchors); 2. identifying the cause that generated the feeling (what you did as "involuntarily" when you assigned people to the anchors discovered); and 3. finding a satisfactory response – an action that satisfies the need that produced that feeling (this last "operation" must first really be understood and there are many more posts before we get there). But to satisfy some curiosity of the moment, I present below a list of emotions/feelings and the corresponding need indicated by that feeling:
Boredom – the need to develop, to have challenges to overcome;
Anger – the need to have fairness, both for ourselves and for others (attention, this is about the actual feeling, without the discovery of a particular cause, about emotion/ instinctive feeling that is unrelated and, by implication, results from a conscious, planned activity);
Guilt – the need to be fair to others or to one's own person;
Sadness – the need to have important things or relationships of value to us;
Loneliness – the need to have relations with our fellow human beings;
Inadequacy/ Inadequacence – the need to feel good enough to achieve something;
Stress – the need to be successful and control in all aspects of our lives;
Fear – the need for safety;
Frustration – the need to have satisfaction in our actions;
Depression – the need to have hope.
So the first step is to identify the feeling. It is often difficult to identify a feeling especially because we are not used to analyzing our feelings or have learned to suppress them. Some authors say that the secret of success is attention and exercise to "listen to the inner voice of emotion/feeling". When it is difficult to identify emotion/feeling we can proceed to step 2 – identifying the cause – and thus we can find the emotion/feeling corresponding. But from my point of view (and the authors I've achieved), identifying anchors is a kind of clarification and identification, performed even unknowingly of the emotions/feelings that are behind the "behind" of words and/ or concrete, identifiable perception of emotions/feelings.
Step 2, which is the identification of the cause, is the very one related to people who gave birth to the emotions/feelings identified or not (taking into account, first of all, your own person). It is only when we know exactly what causes the feeling that we will be able to find the solution, the action necessary to meet the need we have.
And in a kind of "unending" ending, because our life continues, manifests itself constantly, will follow step 3: "finding" and applying a satisfactory response. When we satisfy the need we completely eliminate the cause that generates emotion/feeling and at the same time we eliminate the possibility of recurrence of feeling.
Obviously, so far, we've only taken into account feelings that seem to have negative influences, those that have a requirement to be controlled, possibly eliminated. Let us not forget for a moment that they come directly from the subconscious, that something of our existence that does not differentiate between good and evil. For him (as for us), everything has its purpose and any emotion/feeling is good, they are beneficial, they are a direct reaction to what our conscious does for or against their manifestations but obviously in the idea of giving rise to adaptation to unconscious or conscious requirements.
Finally, but only for information purposes, I will exemplify the primary process of this procedure, using anger (anger) as a feeling. When we perceive a circumstance as unfair to ourselves or those closest to us, we feel angry. Anger motivates us to act to restore the correctness of that situation. And, we have two possibilities to act: we can act in a destructive way by doing something that would endanger us or others (physical or verbal violence or other ineffective action, in most cases - often guilt will arise that attracts, in a vicious circle anger, due to the "relocation" of injustice), or we can act in a creative way by finding and implementing solutions that can solve the situation in a positive way. Every time we experience the feeling of anger, we experience the fear that arises from the perception that the situation could be dangerous. Anger thus reveals the fears we have in a certain circumstance. Because this feeling arises from our perceptions it is extremely important to carry out a reality check: "Is this situation really unfair? Or is my perception incorrect?"
If we find a supporting component throughout the situation, the pressure generated by the feeling of anger will be greatly reduced. Therefore, the previous steps will be completed with the new steps represented by: 1. reality check, 2. if the situation is indeed incorrect, then we must act appropriately to remedy this; and 3. if there is nothing we can do to bring fairness to that situation, then forgiveness is the solution. Then often there is nothing we can do for a situation that has occurred in the past. However, this situation can cause us suffering: "We live in the light of our reflected actions of the past. All the things we've done in the past, we're still doing in the present, in our minds, because of the subconscious that recorded everything and reacting to any future action based on "existing records."
In most of the techniques that I will present over time, the last possible action (although it is indicated, depending on your ability to understand and act to be the first) is forgiveness, "became" the antidote that gives us the release of harmful, repressed, stifled feelings within us. These feelings continue to make us suffer and make us perform those harmful actions of distracting us (using food, harmful substances or actions that we later regret).
There's something else I need to point out. The process of forgiveness is based on the consideration that: forgiveness is for the one who forgives, not for the wrongdoer (the offender, the "wrongdoer"). If we decide to forgive we will be the only beneficiaries of forgiveness: we free ourselves from the negative feelings, from the emotional pressure we have accumulated as a result of the past. We realize that as long as we do not forgive, the person who has hurt us will continue to hurt us ("... the things we have done in the past we continue to do in our minds"). To forgive does not mean to forget the events that have happened (especially subconsciously), it does not mean to find an excuse for the person who has hurt us (whether that person is ourselves). Intelligence involves learning from our mistakes. Forgetting that experience leads to ignorance. And the reasoning can continue...
So, concluding, the first step in this attempt of mine to present what will follow is to find and apply a satisfactory, adaptive response, etc. (of course after I made the effort to first identify anchors, then to "position them on people"). And, this is followed/described by 1. reality check, 2. if the situation is indeed incorrect, then we must act appropriately to remedy this; and 3. if there is nothing we can do to bring fairness to that situation, then forgiveness is the solution.
So, for now, checking reality is what follows. But for this, we first need to know the language of the conscious (which I will begin to post when the time is right - with the will of the Lord of our God - I feel crushed by fatigue for a few days now). From tomorrow I'll move on to the concrete nuance of everything I can about the language of the unconscious... Thanks for understanding!
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru