STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
To Study - Technical - Dorin M

Pages New Dacian's MedicineThe Human's Story - The Brain.

Translation Draft

So, we went through a kind of „accumulation” of „points of view” and reached the „tangible” elements of human evolution, „passing” a kind of first stage introductory element…

I’ll start with the ideas of the creationists … Yes, that’s right, which ideas?!? The man was created by the Divine Power and, ready … „Homo Sapiens” directly, without other „tangible” elements of „evolutionary path”, possibly only the possible „end” embodied in a kind of „Homo Peccatum” (The Sinful Man) of nowadays …

From evolutionism, considering that we have already presented all the general „primary” evolutionary elements the first beings to be analyzed are the primates, our „direct cousins” … The most „similar” beings with their evolutionary end materialized in man …

From the scientists, the „story” of the discoveries on this line of research begins in August 1856, in a cave in the Neanderthal Valley in Germany, where the first skull that was assigned to the „cataloged” was discovered. „To be” the Neanderthal Man „(after the name of the place where it was discovered).

Few know that, from a „conceptual” point of view, this moment of discovery fits quite well with the launch of Charles Darwin’s „The Origin of Species”, which is why this discovery will „launch” a true course of human evolution.

Those passionate about this evolution of man relied on the „intuitive” connection (initially emphasized by Darwin) between the monkey and the modern man, the „Neanderthal Man” is described as „half-man, half-monkey”. And, thus, also conceptually, a connection was immediately made, which, in large part, proved to be quite correct.

And thus, the search for human origins was born, the main question that crystallized overtime was „How much can a monkey be, this ancestor of man, and how much must man be to consider himself to be the ancestor of man?” ?!? „.

From the creationists, only adverse reactions, full of anathema … Man is a man and ready! There can be nothing else … And, also from the historical point of view, the creationists had just clarified that the woman has, however, a soul … And this only to Christians … The divine power breathed life into the nostrils only the „favored” Adam …

Going back to the evolutionists, the criteria presented at the beginning of this series of posts were „academically” chosen and „went to work” … There were organized systematic searches, funded and organized from the highest academic „levels”, to find transit links from „half-man monkey – half-man” to modern man …

And, obviously, over time, many evolutionary „links” appeared … More than anyone would have imagined, no matter how proud it may be revealed through the famous „I prefer or am too proud not to accept that they are God’s work” than to accept that I am drawn from the monkey or worms! ”.

But, over time, anthropology has developed continuously and a new „player” has intervened in the field of searching for the origins of modern man, represented by genetics.

Here I will leave again the „logic” of the presentation of the „Homo Sapiens” ancestors, to come back to it at the end of this series of posts … And you will understand why, after going through the „interleaving” materials …

I will proceed by going directly to the „genetic” topics … Genetic techniques focus on only two major typologies of study.

The first, and most practiced, is the study of the „X” type chromosome both on the line of the genetic „constitution” and on the line of some cellular corpuscles, the mitochondria. Well, it has been found that maternal mitochondria are the only clear, indubitable DNA „tires” that do not change from one individual to another, being unique, and can lead to clear, undoubted genetic determination.

At least this is what the current genetics say, its research always confirming, without the possibility of comment, that only a „primordial Eve” is identified, regardless of whether the „remains” studied are of a male individual.

But, stupor, at the mitochondrial level we can only talk about a circular DNA and not one in a „double spiral”, often giving rise to the question of whether it can be considered to be human AND or not … Yes, no matter how strange it seems, at this moment of the scientific conquests, it is clear that this type of DNA can hardly be attributed to the human cell … And, that is not all … You will see something later, in order not to break the logic of this part of my presentation …

The second way is represented by the study of the „Y” type chromosome, of a masculine type, but which can be noticed only by the possibility of identifying certain elements called „marker” (mutation marker). This „marker” is formed with a clear genetic mutation and is transmitted further from the individual to the individual, on the male line, being „permanently” present in the DNA structures.

The disadvantage of the latter procedure is that it is predominantly identifiable from the „transmission” on the male line concerning the first procedure that allows identification, study, comparison, etc. regardless of the gender of the individual. And, do not forget a very important detail, it only identifies the mutations and their perpetuation, specific on a quite questionable genetic transmission line …

But, without further complicating things, from a genetic point of view to today’s humans, all studies confirm that „it seems” that the „original gene” of „maximum weight” is in Africa … There is the starting point of man „modern”.

We used the expression „maximum weight” because there are some „original genes” but which have „relatively insignificant” responses in the overall human population.

Returning to the source in Africa, there is no doubt that the original gene is confirmed precisely in and through the members of the „closed” tribes in that area (the Bushmen) considered and „proven” to be the oldest „genetic” group of the human population.

As a peculiarity, the oldest form of language is also found in Boşimani, being made up only of jokes, whistles, whistles, and other particularly simple sounds, which is considered unique to the whole of humanity, often linguists locating it. as the most primordial form of human communication.

But there are still „original groups” in other areas but, unfortunately, they seem to be „infiltrated” by the markers „from Africa”, the main landmark being a kind of primary „detection” of that marker, without taking in consideration of the transmission capacity by metering with an original population, which did not present that marker.

For example, the second „majority” genetic marker is „discovered” in the Middle East, confirming the population mix with those found here, a point from which he left to discover the next marker in India, the third, which has multiplied rapidly. (confirmed in several „closed” tribes in this territory), then followed by „detection” in China (fourth), then Australia (on the Asian line) and finally population lines on the territory of South America, in populations in the Andes …

Similar to the example of the Bushmen, a step of reference for geneticists is the aboriginal tribes of Australia. And these are a „genetic line start” because, once they arrived here, about 45,000 years ago, they „practiced” a whole „closed” genetic development …

But, the justified question is asked: Are their clear lines, or are we talking about footage related to a certain time?!? If the marker has a reference time but can be transmitted by metering without having any real connection to a clear evolutionary process.

So, genetics can provide, like many other sources of research, only a kind of secondary evidence, quite subjective … So let’s move on, leaving genetics predominant for the time being!

Now, in the logic of my argumentation, one of the main landmarks of the evolution of primates towards man, represented by the evolution of the brain, intervenes … And this is not only in terms of its volume …

From the study of the skulls discovered in the fossils that have „restored” the evolution of the primates to humans, we obtain numerous information such as the volume of the brain, the main developments of its specific areas, etc. … But from secondary sources, especially those related to the physiology of the brain and, what not, even from those related to psychology, many other elements will be obtained …

For example, to present you a comparative study between present-day monkeys and modern humans.

In front of a monkey, he will place a box and show him an object that stimulates his attention and desire to possess it, possibly just food, an experiment that is called by the scientific world called „Permanence of the object”. Thus, the primate and the child will be able to visualize the object, but it is studied what the subject of the experiment will do when he no longer sees the object although he has perceived where it will be placed.

So, the object will be inserted into the box and covered with an object (with a lid function). The same will be done in the case of a human child of a few months old, of course, aiming for the monkey and the human child to be of the same age (for example 3 months).

The reaction of the primate will always be to put aside the object with lid function and to take possession of the object/food… It will always have this instant reaction, without delay … In the case of the human child, stupor, even if it follows where the object is when the lid is placed, it loses contact with it.

Specifically, the loss of the visual connection with the object leads to its nonexistence (if it does not see the object, it does not exist) … Even if the child seeks following the others, instinctively asking for help … And, the unpleasant tone of the experiment, not even initiates some action to remove the lid to take possession of the object …

Well, it is not an experiment that shows that primates are smarter than us, humans … It is just an experiment that, for connoisseurs, shows how quickly it activates functionally and begins to perfect a certain region of the brain, or the whole brain of primates. and/or humans.

The „first perception” conclusion is that the regions of the human brain activate much slower than those of the primates. And this is because of the unusually long childhood that the „human child” benefits from.

And this may seem like a significant evolutionary disadvantage of man, but it is not so, being one of our major advantages … During childhood, our brain is developed according to the environment in which we are born, according to the experiences that are „put to us”. available „… The extension of this period does nothing but increase the volume of information that will be optimally assimilated by the human individual, in direct or indirect contact with the environment, being the” key „of our superior intelligence …

This also competes for another advantage … The human brain is composed of a vast neural network that transports, processes, and stores information considered to be significant, the part of the human brain responsible for high and abstract thinking, the cortex, containing more neurons than any other. being on Earth (a total of about 10 to 16 billion, of course, depending on the individual).

And neurons are organized in a unique, powerful, interconnected form, which will allow us to do things that other beings are not capable of, such as building instruments, complex tools, composing music, and more.

All these in direct contact with the environment, with the help of the other people who clearly and certainly structure a systematic accumulation, a permanent nation of them. So, the human „slowness” is nothing more than a kind of assurance that the accumulations are systematized and permanent in direct interaction with the environment … „Relationship” of development that I have outlined in previous posts.

But, returning to the brain as an organ, however, we should not forget that, in vertebrates, if I may say so, from fish, reptiles and then mammals, to „culminate” with humans, all brains have the same basic structure, architecture „. „Made up of the brain itself (forebrain), the middle brain (midbrain), and the small brain (hindbrain) … Although these are different in terms of shape or function …

And, to make it all weird, the overall architecture of the brain originates from fish worms (the stage of passage from worms to fish), for example, an actual fish-worm from the species Amphioxus (with ancestors from now 500). million years).

This Amphioxus has nothing of what could be called a brain, having simple nerve filaments along the entire body that „gather” in the front of the animal in what could be an incipient brain, unprotected by a skull.

But this is nothing more than the brain itself, the filaments that cross the body of the creature represent the middle brain and some terminal filaments are grouped into what would be a small incipient brain. the structure of the brain that will follow, that will develop and reach the height of man … Filament after filament, filament by filament, on the path that leads to the human brain …

Let’s go into more details such as the neural ganglia that are small extensions, additions to the brains of different living beings?!? Ganglions that, for example in Saurians, seem to have dimensions that, in aggregate, far exceeded even the neuronal mass of the human brain …

And there will be some surprising details, in the following posts … The summary presented would be summed up under one question: „Perhaps only the brain is the most important part of decision-making, accumulation-type and the like, without taking into account I calculate the brain’s inability to intervene in „genetic transmission”?!? „.

But why did I emphasize this, this reality, related to the fact that not only the brain is what matters, but the whole body and, why not, the environment, that it is internal or external?!?

Regardless of how you perceive the following statement, brain volume is an arbitrary, inconclusive landmark … Imagine that somewhere in the future, the skull of an individual with hydrocephalus will be discovered, with a cranial capacity over 2 liters but obviously with mental retardation … Do not imagine that this is not possible, the medical statistics confirming that, close to 5% of the human population has „part” of this problem, the main „development” being in the male …

Then, without having the slightest intention of appearing wicked, which is the difference between the volume of the brain of a normal individual but which is poor at the chapters of human relations, culture, knowledge, relationships and other defining human elements and that of the brain volume of an individual who is it normal or one that is „more advanced” in all these chapters?!?

Or, correlated with the above question, how could one determine the density, the percentage of gray matter, what seems to be related to the level of intelligence and knowledge?!?

So, looking back on our debates, it is quite obvious that scientists hold details with a certain relevance but, at the very top, they even have a discourse that supports human evolution towards something higher, with each step that has made it evolution.

Compared to the creationists who support the degeneration, the approach to the great reward of the Apocalypse …

So, as is obvious, we only reach the previous conclusions that a Divine Power or even nature has gradually, evolutionarily, proceeded on a path of perfecting …

I emphasize that even now I could not give up, I could not remove the divine intervention from any argument. Therefore, I ask the followers of materialism to have a little patience, especially since in the end, in the end, they will reach a higher percentage of justice than the creationists …

But this will be possible only because they restrict themselves strictly to the matter, the truth being more oriented towards what could be described by the expression „divine intervention” … For, about the brain’s intervention in these „evolutionary” processes, we have already established that it is not If …

Yes, the conclusion of this post is certain: “The brain, which can include human experience, cannot be an evolutionary engine! „.

And, not to mention the long, we return to genetics, a science that has concluded that the data are so uncertain that it would be good, correct, or other similar reasoning to make a map of human DNA so that it exists a kind of research support with maximum accuracy …

So, the whole „genetic” community got the job done … The 23 pairs of chromosomes that make up the human haploid genome were taken, of which 22 were found to be autosomal and one determines the sex (xx or xy) … Then it was deciphered little by little the „secret” stored in the approximately 3 billion base pairs of DNA, taking care to make the delineation between the „linear” that is in the cell nucleus and the „circular” one that is in the mitochondria …

Of course, they have discovered, as the research advances, all sorts of things … That the woman has more genes than the man, that the genome has variations of 1% from one individual to another, that there are pseudogenes, that nothing would work without a multitude of „species” of RNA, that DNA is repetitive, almost in an equal percentage, „in the mirror”, that … Many findings …

But, the main shock was that most of the DNA in the human body is not human DNA … And for this reason, they have „opened” a new „genome” type program.

What followed is not the subject of this post (but of others, what will follow) but it is a surprising step and the shocking great discovery of humanity, which I will expose in the following posts …

Therefore, we read again tomorrow, the posts that will follow to „shake” maximally materialistic perceptions, but also the creationist ones … This is because it will quickly conclude that one doctrine can not exist without, the other …

Read and cross, the creationists, read and see how you fight, the materialists, the honest evolutionists are going to live new delights!

Love, Gratitude, and Understanding (Namaste)!

Dorin, Merticaru