STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The
Language of the Subconscious (14).
Translation Draft
Today we will discuss the twin sister of anger, the feeling of guilt (anger and guilt being directly related to the perception of injustice). It is born of necessity, necessity, desire to be fair to each other and to each other. I mean, when a person feels guilt, in fact, she hears his inner voice telling him "I've been unfair/unfair to someone." Anger/anger occurs when injustice is directed at you and guilt occurs when injustice comes from you (it is caused by you).
And, both have as their starting point the fear (of being "hurt" you or someone who "cares" about that injustice). Specifically, in the case of guilt you are afraid/afraid that an unjust act (an unjust action and, by implication, the result of it) that departs from you will hurt someone you care about or even yourself. Here we are talking about self-judgment, social judgment, spiritual judgment, etc. and all the consequences that result from them.
For example, someone asks for your help in solving a problem and you would have the "power"/ the ability to do it but don't. If you feel guilt, your inner voice signals that another was the "solution." If you have the subsequent opportunity to help him, the feeling of guilt will "dissolve" indicating the correctness of the gesture. The next step, if you have no other way to help him, is to forgive yourself (self-forgive, not justify yourself).
This example is relatively harmless but imagine what the situation would be if you cause an accident with the most serious results, if you "lose someone's money", if you do not have the resources to support your children, if you cheat on someone you love (or someone else, such as a friend, an employee, etc.) or you are not present when your presence is critical. The greater the severity of the result, the greater the feeling of guilt and the more concentrated actions, the more extensive the repair, possibly self-forgiveness, are needed. And that's because guilt is the emotional discomfort or pain that motivates us to consider responsibility for our unjust actions in such a way as to avoid the negative consequences that may manifest (or manifest) or, at the very least, diminish (or self-forgive).
I do not go into any further details but I will go directly to identification, which is simpler than you expect and is represented by perceptions related to: guilt/guilt (or another name that expresses a particular level of its intensity such as shame, duty, malice, etc.). The answer to this can only be any way to reduce this feeling, this perception. The questions that can be asked for clarification are like, "Is it really what I did (or didn't) do wrong?", "If it's unfair, what can I do to be right?" or, ultimately, "What can help me/cause me to forgive myself?", and the like. Attention, many people turn to talking to someone to have an "external" point of view (considered to be neutral).
From my point of view this has nothing to do with you, it's just some kind of effort to find self-justification or a solution that has nothing to do with you. The easiest form of "dialogue" is to put yourself in the place of the person and to perceive what actions would be necessary for you to "close" or, at the very least, to "compensate" that injustice. This way will help enormously if there is nothing left to do from your point of view (and available resources) and must be "proceeded" to self-forgiveness. In this case here are some questions that may come to your aid: "Could you have done things better, would you have liked to do this better?", "If you knew what you know now, would you have done things differently?", etc. Be ware, any answers to such questions must be truly satisfactory (if not, look for and/ or act towards the answers found to be truly satisfactory)!
Now, since we've quickly "escaped" guilt (because the details are quite similar to those of anger/anger), let's move on to sadness!
Sadness is often confused with depression because they are very similar feelings, but they are certainly not the same (sadness needs action or forgiveness whereas depression only needs hope and action in the direction of "solving" other feelings, the primary ones). Sadness arises from the need, the need, the desire to have and keep things and people considered (considered)/ proven (proven) to be valuable (valuable), important for our life (and its "good conduct"). It's that inner voice that says, "I've lost someone or something important to me."
It's about people, things, situations that, as long as they exist, are stable, don't change, we feel safe and safe because our lives are more predictable. And when we experience a loss of that, the result is the feeling of sadness that tells us that that loss is significant and we need to take action to regain what or who has been lost or replace (as far as possible) the loss of that person, work or situation.
Interestingly, to debate a little, is the level of sadness, the one that leads to confusion with depression. Being similar feelings (repeat, not the same), the maximum bearable level of sadness causing the appearance of frustration and then depression, it is very easy to be confused. Many doctors (psychologists/psychiatrists) confuse these perceptions and prescribe "wrong" medications (repeat, as they always do, doctors eliminate symptoms do not solve the causes only in fairly rare cases). And, after all, what are the guilty doctors as long as they apply general and rarely custom "procedures"? They have no way of knowing the details of your life (and in the vast majority of cases they are not interested in them). And in the event of this confusion they give you sleeping medications and "dilite" perceptions. That's all.
For example, in case of the loss of a particularly important person in your life you must accept what has happened and find solutions to "replace" everything that represented that person, except its presence. Significant in this case is, for example, the case of loss (death) of a child. More pain I do not think exists, frankly (well, for those "normal to the head"), especially in special cases. An example of my "alliance" family (wife's family) is that of a child killed in the most beastly and pointless conditions possible. Soon sadness turned into depression because parents (those who suffered the maximum loss) did not understand that there was also fate/destiny.
And their lives became a mechanism. They did not, for example, to "share" the remaining surplus of love, energy, etc. to the other children (or even between them), did not accept the possible meeting with God (or something similar to their face), etc... They did not take a stand towards the idea of replacing, at least partially (obviously) the "details" represented in their lives by that girl (God is the only one able to take care of us). They have forgotten, as many of us forget, that the subconscious does not distinguish between reality and imagination. Their lives had to go on once the dice of fate decided that she would leave (regardless of the brutality and "bestiality" of her departure) and they would stay! (but I stop here... who am I to understand this... And I'm not even going to understand that... brrr... Oh, my God, you've experienced this with their help, I don't think there's any need for others...).
So let's see what can be done in case of sadness! First, the first thing necessary is to identify it. Sadness or feeling that expresses a level that must be identified with maximum precision with reference to the "dissemination" of depression, which is only the result that occurs after a maximum, personal (particular) manifestation of sadness, followed by frustration and only then the onset of depression. Then it will be easier to identify what has been lost (person, work, situation). Here we will have to pay attention to what has been lost and why this is something significant, what are the "details" that make it meaningful.
These details are determined by clarifying what is needed, the need, the desire that the person, the work, the situation fulfilled. Possible questions of help in this situation are: "Is it really a loss, or is it something that could not be avoided?", "Is it possible in the person, the work, the situation to be regained or replaced by something that fulfills the needs, needs, desires fulfilled by it?", "Is it possible a normal process of mourning (with reference to the fate of each, the normal course of life that has been going on for a long time before we and the missing person appear on this earth)?", etc.
Beware of the "replacement" processes needed to correct the lack of something that has been lost! Often things are particularly simple... If you've lost contact with such an important person, simply resume contact. If you lose one thing, buy or win another. But it's often not that simple. Don't be too zealous in these "gestures" because you often fall into a kind of trap that can lead to further loss, frustration and then depression. Everything must be done properly, carefully and fairly. No one and nothing can be replaced, especially if it's a person. Only needs, needs and desires related to that person can be fulfilled (by replacement, association, etc.).
Then, let us not forget that that person (the substitute) must be part of your life or, let us not forget that it will take time and resources to "access" this "replacement". And maybe we'll never be able to replace it completely. But let's not forget that even the slightest diminution of perceptions will avoid breaking the weak link in the stress chain. One solution would be to seek some kind of advantage from that loss, be it god-related. Or, if the loss is permanent, where you can't act in any way (especially in the event of the death of people close to us) let's take the time to "weeping" and then move on.
Questions needed to clarify and, above all, to find solutions would be: "Would we really experience a loss?", "What can I do to bring back the work, action or lost person?", "If I can't regain the work, the situation, the person, what can I do to replace them or what actions can I initiate to "compensate" the needs, needs, desires satisfied by that something?" ... Last but not least, admit when you have done everything that could be done, allow the normal "download" represented by mourning and move on (the person who was offended certainly could not wish to waste your life like this).
Everything but absolutely everything is nothing but a kind of trigger of the anchors existing in your subconscious. Don't forget! But we'll discuss everything at the right time... That's enough for today! Tomorrow we'll move on to the feeling of loneliness.
Today we will discuss the twin sister of anger, the feeling of guilt (anger and guilt being directly related to the perception of injustice). It is born of necessity, necessity, desire to be fair to each other and to each other. I mean, when a person feels guilt, in fact, she hears his inner voice telling him "I've been unfair/unfair to someone." Anger/anger occurs when injustice is directed at you and guilt occurs when injustice comes from you (it is caused by you).
And, both have as their starting point the fear (of being "hurt" you or someone who "cares" about that injustice). Specifically, in the case of guilt you are afraid/afraid that an unjust act (an unjust action and, by implication, the result of it) that departs from you will hurt someone you care about or even yourself. Here we are talking about self-judgment, social judgment, spiritual judgment, etc. and all the consequences that result from them.
For example, someone asks for your help in solving a problem and you would have the "power"/ the ability to do it but don't. If you feel guilt, your inner voice signals that another was the "solution." If you have the subsequent opportunity to help him, the feeling of guilt will "dissolve" indicating the correctness of the gesture. The next step, if you have no other way to help him, is to forgive yourself (self-forgive, not justify yourself).
This example is relatively harmless but imagine what the situation would be if you cause an accident with the most serious results, if you "lose someone's money", if you do not have the resources to support your children, if you cheat on someone you love (or someone else, such as a friend, an employee, etc.) or you are not present when your presence is critical. The greater the severity of the result, the greater the feeling of guilt and the more concentrated actions, the more extensive the repair, possibly self-forgiveness, are needed. And that's because guilt is the emotional discomfort or pain that motivates us to consider responsibility for our unjust actions in such a way as to avoid the negative consequences that may manifest (or manifest) or, at the very least, diminish (or self-forgive).
I do not go into any further details but I will go directly to identification, which is simpler than you expect and is represented by perceptions related to: guilt/guilt (or another name that expresses a particular level of its intensity such as shame, duty, malice, etc.). The answer to this can only be any way to reduce this feeling, this perception. The questions that can be asked for clarification are like, "Is it really what I did (or didn't) do wrong?", "If it's unfair, what can I do to be right?" or, ultimately, "What can help me/cause me to forgive myself?", and the like. Attention, many people turn to talking to someone to have an "external" point of view (considered to be neutral).
From my point of view this has nothing to do with you, it's just some kind of effort to find self-justification or a solution that has nothing to do with you. The easiest form of "dialogue" is to put yourself in the place of the person and to perceive what actions would be necessary for you to "close" or, at the very least, to "compensate" that injustice. This way will help enormously if there is nothing left to do from your point of view (and available resources) and must be "proceeded" to self-forgiveness. In this case here are some questions that may come to your aid: "Could you have done things better, would you have liked to do this better?", "If you knew what you know now, would you have done things differently?", etc. Be ware, any answers to such questions must be truly satisfactory (if not, look for and/ or act towards the answers found to be truly satisfactory)!
Now, since we've quickly "escaped" guilt (because the details are quite similar to those of anger/anger), let's move on to sadness!
Sadness is often confused with depression because they are very similar feelings, but they are certainly not the same (sadness needs action or forgiveness whereas depression only needs hope and action in the direction of "solving" other feelings, the primary ones). Sadness arises from the need, the need, the desire to have and keep things and people considered (considered)/ proven (proven) to be valuable (valuable), important for our life (and its "good conduct"). It's that inner voice that says, "I've lost someone or something important to me."
It's about people, things, situations that, as long as they exist, are stable, don't change, we feel safe and safe because our lives are more predictable. And when we experience a loss of that, the result is the feeling of sadness that tells us that that loss is significant and we need to take action to regain what or who has been lost or replace (as far as possible) the loss of that person, work or situation.
Interestingly, to debate a little, is the level of sadness, the one that leads to confusion with depression. Being similar feelings (repeat, not the same), the maximum bearable level of sadness causing the appearance of frustration and then depression, it is very easy to be confused. Many doctors (psychologists/psychiatrists) confuse these perceptions and prescribe "wrong" medications (repeat, as they always do, doctors eliminate symptoms do not solve the causes only in fairly rare cases). And, after all, what are the guilty doctors as long as they apply general and rarely custom "procedures"? They have no way of knowing the details of your life (and in the vast majority of cases they are not interested in them). And in the event of this confusion they give you sleeping medications and "dilite" perceptions. That's all.
For example, in case of the loss of a particularly important person in your life you must accept what has happened and find solutions to "replace" everything that represented that person, except its presence. Significant in this case is, for example, the case of loss (death) of a child. More pain I do not think exists, frankly (well, for those "normal to the head"), especially in special cases. An example of my "alliance" family (wife's family) is that of a child killed in the most beastly and pointless conditions possible. Soon sadness turned into depression because parents (those who suffered the maximum loss) did not understand that there was also fate/destiny.
And their lives became a mechanism. They did not, for example, to "share" the remaining surplus of love, energy, etc. to the other children (or even between them), did not accept the possible meeting with God (or something similar to their face), etc... They did not take a stand towards the idea of replacing, at least partially (obviously) the "details" represented in their lives by that girl (God is the only one able to take care of us). They have forgotten, as many of us forget, that the subconscious does not distinguish between reality and imagination. Their lives had to go on once the dice of fate decided that she would leave (regardless of the brutality and "bestiality" of her departure) and they would stay! (but I stop here... who am I to understand this... And I'm not even going to understand that... brrr... Oh, my God, you've experienced this with their help, I don't think there's any need for others...).
So let's see what can be done in case of sadness! First, the first thing necessary is to identify it. Sadness or feeling that expresses a level that must be identified with maximum precision with reference to the "dissemination" of depression, which is only the result that occurs after a maximum, personal (particular) manifestation of sadness, followed by frustration and only then the onset of depression. Then it will be easier to identify what has been lost (person, work, situation). Here we will have to pay attention to what has been lost and why this is something significant, what are the "details" that make it meaningful.
These details are determined by clarifying what is needed, the need, the desire that the person, the work, the situation fulfilled. Possible questions of help in this situation are: "Is it really a loss, or is it something that could not be avoided?", "Is it possible in the person, the work, the situation to be regained or replaced by something that fulfills the needs, needs, desires fulfilled by it?", "Is it possible a normal process of mourning (with reference to the fate of each, the normal course of life that has been going on for a long time before we and the missing person appear on this earth)?", etc.
Beware of the "replacement" processes needed to correct the lack of something that has been lost! Often things are particularly simple... If you've lost contact with such an important person, simply resume contact. If you lose one thing, buy or win another. But it's often not that simple. Don't be too zealous in these "gestures" because you often fall into a kind of trap that can lead to further loss, frustration and then depression. Everything must be done properly, carefully and fairly. No one and nothing can be replaced, especially if it's a person. Only needs, needs and desires related to that person can be fulfilled (by replacement, association, etc.).
Then, let us not forget that that person (the substitute) must be part of your life or, let us not forget that it will take time and resources to "access" this "replacement". And maybe we'll never be able to replace it completely. But let's not forget that even the slightest diminution of perceptions will avoid breaking the weak link in the stress chain. One solution would be to seek some kind of advantage from that loss, be it god-related. Or, if the loss is permanent, where you can't act in any way (especially in the event of the death of people close to us) let's take the time to "weeping" and then move on.
Questions needed to clarify and, above all, to find solutions would be: "Would we really experience a loss?", "What can I do to bring back the work, action or lost person?", "If I can't regain the work, the situation, the person, what can I do to replace them or what actions can I initiate to "compensate" the needs, needs, desires satisfied by that something?" ... Last but not least, admit when you have done everything that could be done, allow the normal "download" represented by mourning and move on (the person who was offended certainly could not wish to waste your life like this).
Everything but absolutely everything is nothing but a kind of trigger of the anchors existing in your subconscious. Don't forget! But we'll discuss everything at the right time... That's enough for today! Tomorrow we'll move on to the feeling of loneliness.
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru