STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The
Language of the Subconscious (19).
Translation Draft
Emotional resonance is triggered by the activation of past emotions, stored at the subconscious level, and can be beneficial (the result of our perceptions being "good"/ "positive" and we feel good through this resonance) or it can be unpleasant, "bad"/ "negative", characterized by a general perception of "bad" (in the case of the resultant reverse direction). This is caused (may be) by sympathy. In our case I will only address the "tent" of its action which can have "negative" consequences.
From my point of view (and those accepted to be my source of documentation), sympathy is the ability to have common feelings. More advancedly, sympathy is the correlation that exists between two or more individuals, two or more bodies capable of communicating, perceiving and interpreting their vibrational energy through an environment. If this sympathy is manifested at our level, within us is obviously emotional resonance. But this concept can extend to others because resonance involves the interaction of at least two environmental elements. So the difference between emotional resonance and sympathy is given only by the expanding number of units of perception.
So when we feel sympathy for someone else's pain, but also ours (yes, it is possible) we are motivated to help, to take action in the sense of doing something. Until we are able to separate our feelings and needs (especially related to the past) from the feelings and needs of others, it will be difficult to recognize what response (if any) is close, correct, localizable. So the ability to experience sympathy, or emotional resonance, demonstrates that we have a very real connection with both ourselves and those around us, especially those around us. This connection allows us to operate in a positive sense, compatible with ourselves in any social group, allowing living together. Therefore, humans are genetically programmed to help those around them, starting from their own children (the most important aspect of the existence and perpetuation of the species). In fact, the lack of this connection (or manifestations of dissonance) is a symptom of the existence of mental disorders.
So it's no surprise to feel more sympathy for and with the people we care about more, like between mother and child. The mother-child connection is so deep that it creates particularly strong bonds of sympathy, without taking into account the massive emotional resonance that will manifest itself over long periods of time, completing the "records" of the subconscious at an accelerated rate (we used the term "complement" because research has revealed that many such "records" are transferred simply from the moment of conception to the moment of birth , the obvious aim being to increase compatibility and the maximum possibility of manifestation of emotional resonance that will help the child to raise and thus to perpetuate the species).
It follows that emotional sympathy will manifest itself to varying degrees depending on the level of love and care we have towards a person, being maximum towards ourselves, then towards children, parents, lover/girlfriend, close friends and so on, being minimal towards an unknown person (who has not interacted directly or indirectly with us and our beliefs). So the more we care about a person, the higher we will have levels of emotional resonance, the more sympathetic we will be, being motivated to act in the interests of others, especially those we love and those who matter (and here I am referring to those who are like us, who are of the same race, of the same religion, nationality in relation to those who perceive them to be different from us).
But this ability also allows the perception of pain, which has consequences that depend on everyone's point of view. History is full of such manifestations that have drawn injustices from the most terrible, crimes, wars, etc. being the source that attracts people/communities together or separates them. When one perceives fear, person or nationality, it is all due to the perceived danger of being present in the "other side". Thus, the fear we feel motivates us to help each other, perhaps to prepare us to reject or avoid dangerous circumstances.
A narrow example would be that of brothers where the younger brother is harassed by a neighboring child somewhat more aggressive than they should. The older brother will feel the fear of the younger brother and, most of the time, will make contact with the aggressor informing him that any attack on the younger brother is an attack on him, the older brother. And perhaps the aggressive neighbor will cease his manifestations. Nations unite in the same way, making contacts, treaties, alliances as support against a particular perceived enemy, and any attack against one of them will be considered an attack against all.
So, sympathy would be the ability to feel the pain (needs, needs, desires) of others through emotional resonance, motivating us to take care of each other, especially when one is weak, needs help from the point of view of a situation considered to be correct. What is felt in this case is a combination of interpersonal resonance with others generated by needs, needs, unfulfilled desires to which is added emotional resonance with our own past. It is a potential mix that can attract overreactions to a situation that primarily affects another person.
To complete these comments I will give another example. It is about a father who has been treated unfairly and the son finds that he is treated the same way. They will perceive an emotional resonance about the father's past and feelings of anger, fear and frustration will flood the present into the avalanche. The father will become over-protective with his son in order to protect him from what he has experienced in the past, a reaction similar to that of the son who thus extends the efforts of the father. So the father has a reaction motivated by love and the reaction to protect his son while he will be motivated by the need to eliminate injustice, to correct the problem.
Now let's see what we can do! Obviously, first of all, we will have to identify sympathy or any other term that signifies a particular level of it such as "agree with", "compassion", etc. Helpful questions, clarifying, would be: "What creates my emotional resonance towards the situation of others?", "What needs, needs, desires I feel I must and can satisfy?". This will be done to identify emotional resonance with other people (here I mean the perceptions that can attribute to them attributes similar to that of "evil", "harmful" or the like, those perceptions that make us feel "stupid").
It is only after this identification that a kind of reality check will be made to see whether action should be taken against us or those around us. There will be a suite of questions like: "My perceptions of one person or more are emotional pain?", "Is that person, or am I, in a certain degree of real danger, need, need, desire that can be solved by someone else or me?", "Are my perceptions of the problems of others real, correct, accurate?", "Is immediate need for action?", "Is it possible and good to act like this?" , and others. Moreover, this verification of the reality of perceptions can be done compared to other people by asking you questions like: "Are her perceptions of the situation of existence correct and real?", "Is there another way of looking at things?", and the like.
Depending on what we find we will have to do a kind of planning of gestures, actions, etc. that are necessary to meet the needs, needs, desires of our or those around us that we care about (my advice is not to expand your efforts more than that, because otherwise you will do politics)... If our desires to act are motivated by emotional pressure (even a strong emotional resonance) related to an event of the past, more than the true needs of the landmark person, it is almost certain that this is not the case. Why?!? Because in this case you do not correctly interpret the manifestation of feelings, you need to help yourself and not others.
It is quite possible that by following these steps you will perceive that this is something very important. Your feelings will tell you a lot about unresolved problems related to your past by telling you what to do. But obviously, if it's a basic need, an imminent danger that you need to respond to, being the closest person who can do that, take a stand, act! If a child, an old man, a woman or any helpless person has a need that you can satisfy, the right thing is to act, to satisfy that need. The feeling of sympathy, the emotional resonance, was created to help each other for the good of all.
Offf, I don't have time to write... I have to pull a bachelor's job to make some more money, go to work... And I'm leaving tomorrow for my daughter's exams (and not the day after tomorrow)... I'll try to take the laptop with me and continue (thanks for understanding)... Have a good day, everyone!
Emotional resonance is triggered by the activation of past emotions, stored at the subconscious level, and can be beneficial (the result of our perceptions being "good"/ "positive" and we feel good through this resonance) or it can be unpleasant, "bad"/ "negative", characterized by a general perception of "bad" (in the case of the resultant reverse direction). This is caused (may be) by sympathy. In our case I will only address the "tent" of its action which can have "negative" consequences.
From my point of view (and those accepted to be my source of documentation), sympathy is the ability to have common feelings. More advancedly, sympathy is the correlation that exists between two or more individuals, two or more bodies capable of communicating, perceiving and interpreting their vibrational energy through an environment. If this sympathy is manifested at our level, within us is obviously emotional resonance. But this concept can extend to others because resonance involves the interaction of at least two environmental elements. So the difference between emotional resonance and sympathy is given only by the expanding number of units of perception.
So when we feel sympathy for someone else's pain, but also ours (yes, it is possible) we are motivated to help, to take action in the sense of doing something. Until we are able to separate our feelings and needs (especially related to the past) from the feelings and needs of others, it will be difficult to recognize what response (if any) is close, correct, localizable. So the ability to experience sympathy, or emotional resonance, demonstrates that we have a very real connection with both ourselves and those around us, especially those around us. This connection allows us to operate in a positive sense, compatible with ourselves in any social group, allowing living together. Therefore, humans are genetically programmed to help those around them, starting from their own children (the most important aspect of the existence and perpetuation of the species). In fact, the lack of this connection (or manifestations of dissonance) is a symptom of the existence of mental disorders.
So it's no surprise to feel more sympathy for and with the people we care about more, like between mother and child. The mother-child connection is so deep that it creates particularly strong bonds of sympathy, without taking into account the massive emotional resonance that will manifest itself over long periods of time, completing the "records" of the subconscious at an accelerated rate (we used the term "complement" because research has revealed that many such "records" are transferred simply from the moment of conception to the moment of birth , the obvious aim being to increase compatibility and the maximum possibility of manifestation of emotional resonance that will help the child to raise and thus to perpetuate the species).
It follows that emotional sympathy will manifest itself to varying degrees depending on the level of love and care we have towards a person, being maximum towards ourselves, then towards children, parents, lover/girlfriend, close friends and so on, being minimal towards an unknown person (who has not interacted directly or indirectly with us and our beliefs). So the more we care about a person, the higher we will have levels of emotional resonance, the more sympathetic we will be, being motivated to act in the interests of others, especially those we love and those who matter (and here I am referring to those who are like us, who are of the same race, of the same religion, nationality in relation to those who perceive them to be different from us).
But this ability also allows the perception of pain, which has consequences that depend on everyone's point of view. History is full of such manifestations that have drawn injustices from the most terrible, crimes, wars, etc. being the source that attracts people/communities together or separates them. When one perceives fear, person or nationality, it is all due to the perceived danger of being present in the "other side". Thus, the fear we feel motivates us to help each other, perhaps to prepare us to reject or avoid dangerous circumstances.
A narrow example would be that of brothers where the younger brother is harassed by a neighboring child somewhat more aggressive than they should. The older brother will feel the fear of the younger brother and, most of the time, will make contact with the aggressor informing him that any attack on the younger brother is an attack on him, the older brother. And perhaps the aggressive neighbor will cease his manifestations. Nations unite in the same way, making contacts, treaties, alliances as support against a particular perceived enemy, and any attack against one of them will be considered an attack against all.
So, sympathy would be the ability to feel the pain (needs, needs, desires) of others through emotional resonance, motivating us to take care of each other, especially when one is weak, needs help from the point of view of a situation considered to be correct. What is felt in this case is a combination of interpersonal resonance with others generated by needs, needs, unfulfilled desires to which is added emotional resonance with our own past. It is a potential mix that can attract overreactions to a situation that primarily affects another person.
To complete these comments I will give another example. It is about a father who has been treated unfairly and the son finds that he is treated the same way. They will perceive an emotional resonance about the father's past and feelings of anger, fear and frustration will flood the present into the avalanche. The father will become over-protective with his son in order to protect him from what he has experienced in the past, a reaction similar to that of the son who thus extends the efforts of the father. So the father has a reaction motivated by love and the reaction to protect his son while he will be motivated by the need to eliminate injustice, to correct the problem.
Now let's see what we can do! Obviously, first of all, we will have to identify sympathy or any other term that signifies a particular level of it such as "agree with", "compassion", etc. Helpful questions, clarifying, would be: "What creates my emotional resonance towards the situation of others?", "What needs, needs, desires I feel I must and can satisfy?". This will be done to identify emotional resonance with other people (here I mean the perceptions that can attribute to them attributes similar to that of "evil", "harmful" or the like, those perceptions that make us feel "stupid").
It is only after this identification that a kind of reality check will be made to see whether action should be taken against us or those around us. There will be a suite of questions like: "My perceptions of one person or more are emotional pain?", "Is that person, or am I, in a certain degree of real danger, need, need, desire that can be solved by someone else or me?", "Are my perceptions of the problems of others real, correct, accurate?", "Is immediate need for action?", "Is it possible and good to act like this?" , and others. Moreover, this verification of the reality of perceptions can be done compared to other people by asking you questions like: "Are her perceptions of the situation of existence correct and real?", "Is there another way of looking at things?", and the like.
Depending on what we find we will have to do a kind of planning of gestures, actions, etc. that are necessary to meet the needs, needs, desires of our or those around us that we care about (my advice is not to expand your efforts more than that, because otherwise you will do politics)... If our desires to act are motivated by emotional pressure (even a strong emotional resonance) related to an event of the past, more than the true needs of the landmark person, it is almost certain that this is not the case. Why?!? Because in this case you do not correctly interpret the manifestation of feelings, you need to help yourself and not others.
It is quite possible that by following these steps you will perceive that this is something very important. Your feelings will tell you a lot about unresolved problems related to your past by telling you what to do. But obviously, if it's a basic need, an imminent danger that you need to respond to, being the closest person who can do that, take a stand, act! If a child, an old man, a woman or any helpless person has a need that you can satisfy, the right thing is to act, to satisfy that need. The feeling of sympathy, the emotional resonance, was created to help each other for the good of all.
Offf, I don't have time to write... I have to pull a bachelor's job to make some more money, go to work... And I'm leaving tomorrow for my daughter's exams (and not the day after tomorrow)... I'll try to take the laptop with me and continue (thanks for understanding)... Have a good day, everyone!
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru