STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The
Language of the Whole (5).
Translation Draft
We have come to the model of contrast clarification, a tool that will help us to have greater clarity regarding our desires. Here are some areas of life where clarification is beneficial: health, relationship with life partner, relationships with friends, relationships with close friends/relatives, relationships with external contacts, business relations, relationships with superiors, education, career, money, others.
This model involves, first of all, making anchor sheets (with all the "structuring" described in previous posts). However, if you do not wish to make this effort, you can proceed directly to this (current) procedure of contrast clarification. Remember that any effort to resolve the demands of the primary feelings, to clarify our problems, desires etc. has a particularly beneficial effect. So, it is welcome any step you take, even from here (although I come back and I will often come back, it is good to start from scratch in order to be able to master details of major importance). The first worksheet/worksheet for contrast clarification takes the form of:
Contrast (things I don't like): 1, 2, 3, ... their enumeration;
Clarity (things I like): 1, 2, 3, ... correspondence at the first.
This card is in fact in the form of a table, which in the "heading" contrast will record things that do not like (which can be inferred very effectively from the anchor sheets or can be deducted on the spot, but this second "procedure" attracts a rather high degree of identification error) and, after completing all the desired positions (or available) is moved to the completion of the second heading , the one for clarity, which will list the answers of clarity to each contrast statement passed in the first heading.
To understand "what is going on" we will proceed to the construction of two case studies that will "reflect", according to the specialists, some of the most interesting and common ideas. These case studies are also "annexing" them because there is something special in someone else's story, presented, that will make these ideas come to life more. So, we chose two case studies that represent two common areas of interest, in which people applied the law of resonance to get what they wanted.
So, the first case is Maria's and she analyzes the couple's relationships.
Maria, 20, is tired and frustrated because she constantly awakens the interest of only the wrong men. She is a young woman "particularly appetizing", high "above average", but also particularly educated compared to most men "around her" (accessible to her). She complains that she only attracts inappropriate men, or who are unavailable, insensitive, with whom she has nothing to communicate/discuss and who almost never consider her to be a priority in their lives. In addition, she first calls for her friendship, but most of them, if not all of them, are limited to demands with a clear sexual tinge, when she is not yet willing to do so.
So, Maria, decided to apply step 1, that of identifying personal desires, using the worksheet from the contrast clarification model. Therefore, she will proceed to complete the first box, that of the contrasts.
Contrast (things I don't like): 1. Control, 2. Don't pay attention to me when I talk, 3. Doesn't care what I think or feel, 4. Make decisions without consulting me, 5. He has nothing to talk to him (he has no common topics), 6. He's more interested in his friends even in my presence, 7. She's too interested in sex, although she's often made it clear that's not the case yet, 8. He doesn't like to travel.
In aid of deducting these contrasts, Maria used the anchor lists where she identified the association of anchors with her former friends (those taken into account). An example of a unique personalized anchor was the feeling of loneliness (feeling) suggested by the image of a man (anchor) with customization on the five men analyzed. In some men (personalization) identified the male anchor, the feeling of "choking, control", and so .m. Finally, with the help of previously made cards, it was not difficult to infer all the "inscribed" contrasts.
These elements were completed after an effort of several days, after having made several successive sheets, in which Mary took into account, analyzed, synthesized, etc. more than five previous relationships. It takes time and attention, so it doesn't matter how long it takes, but, more, to make the analysis as accurate and complete as possible. Note that the examples to be given below have some examples but, in reality, the cards you will draw up is most effective when you add as many "points" as possible to your list of contrasts (to which will necessarily come the "answers" of clarity), somewhere between 50 and 100, if possible, you have the patience and time required. The more contrast elements you identify, the more clarity you will generate (but, importantly, you will often need to achieve a kind of "simplification", "melting" of the statements).
My note: If I were a woman, I wouldn't lose a single second with such a "No hominis" (found in each of the five analyzed). But women, with their extremely masochistic, genetically imprinted tinted, tend to insist and, we will go with the example further, presenting what Maria wrote in the clarity section...
Clarity (things I like): 1. Flexible and balanced (against "1. Controls"), 2. He listens to me very carefully (against "2. He's not paying attention to me when I talk"), 3. They ask me what I think and what I feel (against "3. He doesn't care what I think or feel" – and from now on I don't specify against what clarity is about, you know), 4. He asks me what I think when he decisions, 5. He likes to find common topics for discussion, 6. He prefers my company to my friends' company, 7. He's more interested in me than having sex with me; 8. He likes to go out in the world, he likes trips, be they long or short, he likes adventure and he likes to explore new places together.
In this case the effort was much greater than that in the case of identifying contrasts. Maria read each of the items on the list and asked herself, "What do I want?!?." After writing the answers, he cut each of the contrast elements with a line. This "cutting" is not only intended to remove from the list a "resolved" point but also sends a visual message to the subconscious that then acts both in the sense of subjecting to the new "requested" behavior but also in the sense of eliminating any contrast thus cut. Details, but the ones that matter, as the anchor cards use the red border highlight on the outside and purple on the inside.
For today we come to this example, and we will develop the second example.
The second case will be that of Alin, who analyses his financial situation. Alin is 35, she has enough money to live, but she constantly complains that her money isn't enough. In fact, he says he feels very stressed about his financial situation and has decided to use his new information to improve his financial situation. The resonance control process begins with identifying desires, using the contrast worksheet that will look like this:
Contrast (Things I don't like): 1. Insufficient money, 2. Always outstanding bills to pay, 3. Money to live on the limit, 4. I can't afford to buy anything I want, 5. Earnings are too small, 6. I never earn anything (lotto, prizes, others), 7. Money doesn't come easily to me, 8. The money problem is stressing me out.
Next, the contrast elements are entered in the clarity column, taking care each time to cut the contrast statement that has been cancelled by the clarity line. In this case, Alin recalled his entire financial situation over the past year and took about two days to complete this table.
Clarity (Things I like): 1. Money in abundance, 2. Bills are paid quickly and easily, 3. I always take my money, 4. I always have enough money to buy whatever I want, 5. I always earn more than I need, 6. I often win prizes, I get gifts and many things for free, 7. Money comes easily to me, 8. The question of money and my relationship with them make me feel good.
And, apart from these examples, you can choose any area of interest in your life, such as your ideal career (with a list of contrasts that may include "work hours are too long" or "low pay" or others – you can also relate to your previous jobs).
And, about that, they were to be said for the first step – identifying desires. The summary of the main ideas would be: 1. Words generate a vibration that is either positive or negative, 2. When using the word "no", in fact you continue to pay more attention, energy and focus to the thing you are referring to, 3. When you surprise yourself using denials, ask yourself what you want, 4. When you go from what you don't want (contrasts) to what you want (clarification) , the language changes, and when the words change your vibration will change, 5. You can't emit two different vibrations at the same time, 6. You can readjust your vibration by simply changing words, remembering that thoughts are made up of words, 7.
Contrast is made up of those things that make you uncomfortable (so avoid recording concepts that do not produce feelings in You), 8. Quickly notice the contrast, knowing that the law of resonance always responds to the vibration emitted by you, 9. Use the contrast to get more clarity and 10. When you make up the list of contrast elements, look for as many as possible (possibly using previously drawn anchor cards); the more contrasts you find, the more clarity you will gain.
Remember, at this step you have just punctuated what your wishes are. You must have had a good time identifying and writing what you wanted, or maybe it tried a sense of doubt. OK, as long as there are so many "details". But you will notice after a while that everything has changed towards the "clarity" that you have recorded.
And, that's enough for today. Tomorrow we will discuss step 2, pay attention to your wishes.
We have come to the model of contrast clarification, a tool that will help us to have greater clarity regarding our desires. Here are some areas of life where clarification is beneficial: health, relationship with life partner, relationships with friends, relationships with close friends/relatives, relationships with external contacts, business relations, relationships with superiors, education, career, money, others.
This model involves, first of all, making anchor sheets (with all the "structuring" described in previous posts). However, if you do not wish to make this effort, you can proceed directly to this (current) procedure of contrast clarification. Remember that any effort to resolve the demands of the primary feelings, to clarify our problems, desires etc. has a particularly beneficial effect. So, it is welcome any step you take, even from here (although I come back and I will often come back, it is good to start from scratch in order to be able to master details of major importance). The first worksheet/worksheet for contrast clarification takes the form of:
Contrast (things I don't like): 1, 2, 3, ... their enumeration;
Clarity (things I like): 1, 2, 3, ... correspondence at the first.
This card is in fact in the form of a table, which in the "heading" contrast will record things that do not like (which can be inferred very effectively from the anchor sheets or can be deducted on the spot, but this second "procedure" attracts a rather high degree of identification error) and, after completing all the desired positions (or available) is moved to the completion of the second heading , the one for clarity, which will list the answers of clarity to each contrast statement passed in the first heading.
To understand "what is going on" we will proceed to the construction of two case studies that will "reflect", according to the specialists, some of the most interesting and common ideas. These case studies are also "annexing" them because there is something special in someone else's story, presented, that will make these ideas come to life more. So, we chose two case studies that represent two common areas of interest, in which people applied the law of resonance to get what they wanted.
So, the first case is Maria's and she analyzes the couple's relationships.
Maria, 20, is tired and frustrated because she constantly awakens the interest of only the wrong men. She is a young woman "particularly appetizing", high "above average", but also particularly educated compared to most men "around her" (accessible to her). She complains that she only attracts inappropriate men, or who are unavailable, insensitive, with whom she has nothing to communicate/discuss and who almost never consider her to be a priority in their lives. In addition, she first calls for her friendship, but most of them, if not all of them, are limited to demands with a clear sexual tinge, when she is not yet willing to do so.
So, Maria, decided to apply step 1, that of identifying personal desires, using the worksheet from the contrast clarification model. Therefore, she will proceed to complete the first box, that of the contrasts.
Contrast (things I don't like): 1. Control, 2. Don't pay attention to me when I talk, 3. Doesn't care what I think or feel, 4. Make decisions without consulting me, 5. He has nothing to talk to him (he has no common topics), 6. He's more interested in his friends even in my presence, 7. She's too interested in sex, although she's often made it clear that's not the case yet, 8. He doesn't like to travel.
In aid of deducting these contrasts, Maria used the anchor lists where she identified the association of anchors with her former friends (those taken into account). An example of a unique personalized anchor was the feeling of loneliness (feeling) suggested by the image of a man (anchor) with customization on the five men analyzed. In some men (personalization) identified the male anchor, the feeling of "choking, control", and so .m. Finally, with the help of previously made cards, it was not difficult to infer all the "inscribed" contrasts.
These elements were completed after an effort of several days, after having made several successive sheets, in which Mary took into account, analyzed, synthesized, etc. more than five previous relationships. It takes time and attention, so it doesn't matter how long it takes, but, more, to make the analysis as accurate and complete as possible. Note that the examples to be given below have some examples but, in reality, the cards you will draw up is most effective when you add as many "points" as possible to your list of contrasts (to which will necessarily come the "answers" of clarity), somewhere between 50 and 100, if possible, you have the patience and time required. The more contrast elements you identify, the more clarity you will generate (but, importantly, you will often need to achieve a kind of "simplification", "melting" of the statements).
My note: If I were a woman, I wouldn't lose a single second with such a "No hominis" (found in each of the five analyzed). But women, with their extremely masochistic, genetically imprinted tinted, tend to insist and, we will go with the example further, presenting what Maria wrote in the clarity section...
Clarity (things I like): 1. Flexible and balanced (against "1. Controls"), 2. He listens to me very carefully (against "2. He's not paying attention to me when I talk"), 3. They ask me what I think and what I feel (against "3. He doesn't care what I think or feel" – and from now on I don't specify against what clarity is about, you know), 4. He asks me what I think when he decisions, 5. He likes to find common topics for discussion, 6. He prefers my company to my friends' company, 7. He's more interested in me than having sex with me; 8. He likes to go out in the world, he likes trips, be they long or short, he likes adventure and he likes to explore new places together.
In this case the effort was much greater than that in the case of identifying contrasts. Maria read each of the items on the list and asked herself, "What do I want?!?." After writing the answers, he cut each of the contrast elements with a line. This "cutting" is not only intended to remove from the list a "resolved" point but also sends a visual message to the subconscious that then acts both in the sense of subjecting to the new "requested" behavior but also in the sense of eliminating any contrast thus cut. Details, but the ones that matter, as the anchor cards use the red border highlight on the outside and purple on the inside.
For today we come to this example, and we will develop the second example.
The second case will be that of Alin, who analyses his financial situation. Alin is 35, she has enough money to live, but she constantly complains that her money isn't enough. In fact, he says he feels very stressed about his financial situation and has decided to use his new information to improve his financial situation. The resonance control process begins with identifying desires, using the contrast worksheet that will look like this:
Contrast (Things I don't like): 1. Insufficient money, 2. Always outstanding bills to pay, 3. Money to live on the limit, 4. I can't afford to buy anything I want, 5. Earnings are too small, 6. I never earn anything (lotto, prizes, others), 7. Money doesn't come easily to me, 8. The money problem is stressing me out.
Next, the contrast elements are entered in the clarity column, taking care each time to cut the contrast statement that has been cancelled by the clarity line. In this case, Alin recalled his entire financial situation over the past year and took about two days to complete this table.
Clarity (Things I like): 1. Money in abundance, 2. Bills are paid quickly and easily, 3. I always take my money, 4. I always have enough money to buy whatever I want, 5. I always earn more than I need, 6. I often win prizes, I get gifts and many things for free, 7. Money comes easily to me, 8. The question of money and my relationship with them make me feel good.
And, apart from these examples, you can choose any area of interest in your life, such as your ideal career (with a list of contrasts that may include "work hours are too long" or "low pay" or others – you can also relate to your previous jobs).
And, about that, they were to be said for the first step – identifying desires. The summary of the main ideas would be: 1. Words generate a vibration that is either positive or negative, 2. When using the word "no", in fact you continue to pay more attention, energy and focus to the thing you are referring to, 3. When you surprise yourself using denials, ask yourself what you want, 4. When you go from what you don't want (contrasts) to what you want (clarification) , the language changes, and when the words change your vibration will change, 5. You can't emit two different vibrations at the same time, 6. You can readjust your vibration by simply changing words, remembering that thoughts are made up of words, 7.
Contrast is made up of those things that make you uncomfortable (so avoid recording concepts that do not produce feelings in You), 8. Quickly notice the contrast, knowing that the law of resonance always responds to the vibration emitted by you, 9. Use the contrast to get more clarity and 10. When you make up the list of contrast elements, look for as many as possible (possibly using previously drawn anchor cards); the more contrasts you find, the more clarity you will gain.
Remember, at this step you have just punctuated what your wishes are. You must have had a good time identifying and writing what you wanted, or maybe it tried a sense of doubt. OK, as long as there are so many "details". But you will notice after a while that everything has changed towards the "clarity" that you have recorded.
And, that's enough for today. Tomorrow we will discuss step 2, pay attention to your wishes.
Love,
Gratitude and Understanding (Namaste)!!!
Dorin, Merticaru