STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The Human's story - Conclusion to
"Beginnings"
Translation Draft
Here I come to a kind of
end of my great introduction through this series of posts
"Beginnings", which has "jumped" of 75,000 words that constitute
in a kind of manifest statement and, in no way, be able to make
a real introduction to what is to come... So it's time to "draw"
one or more conclusions!
The universe has evolved,
finely tuned to create life, of many types, apart from the
carbon-based one, that of Earth... And from what we have
discovered through all the materials, there are both definite
"Big Bang" landmarks in reference to an intrinsic capacity of
matter to evolve towards life but also of the "God Bang" type if
we consider the definite manifestations of a world of souls,
those that create everything, from matter to life...
So, there can be nothing
certain that can be considered apart from what can complete the
whole without the possibility of "contestations" out of
evolution... Evolution is the only certain element, constant,
indisputable, regardless of the evolutionary or creationist
point of view... A true "common factor"...
So it is not precisely
evolutionism that supports evolution?!? Isn't he some kind of
indisputable solution to decipher who we are and, why not, what
we're going to be?!?
Strange as it may seem,
evolutionism and evolution are a part of the "system", because
evolution also occurs in the case of creationism, if we
eliminate the dogmas of the "puerile" of religions... From what
we have discovered and constituted as clear, researchable,
repeatable evidence, according to all the principles of science,
there is a kind of inexplicable "something" behind any
materialistic evolution, an equally inexplicable "something"
behind any creationist evolution...
And, from my point of view
and the accepted authors, the only "detail" that is lost along
the way is the "purpose", the "objective", the "interest"...
Evolutionism, with
"chaotic" and "natural selection" tends to lose the "qualities
of matter" discovered in posts about energy, universe and
implicitly Earth, the "qualities of water" discovered in water
posts and then all the elements of life discovered in posts
about the evolution of life and, custom, that of man, in terms
of their complete bonds, which seem effectively governed... What
seems clearly related to what it says, "in small",
creationists...
So, the logic of a
deduction will force me to carry everything forward by
permanently putting the materialists, evolutionists first and
only then, step by step, to venture to structure the creationist
elements, those difficult to accept in the "presence" of so many
dogmas, including those of materialists...
So, summarizing on the
basis of the above we will have only one palpable conclusion:
Whether it was to be a kind of "God Bang" or a "Big Bang",
evolution is what matters, regardless of the source, processes
or "characters" along the way being only evolutionary stages in
what would be the manifestation of each "part" of the
holographic ensemble towards the elimination of contradictions,
towards stability...
But what about the
"purpose" I mentioned earlier?!?
Well, purpose only arises
in the case of creationist elements... From what I have
presented, life seems to be the direct or "corrected" product
from the specific point of evolution to what would be the
present man, possibly beings with the same abilities of
self-consciousness and other defining elements of man...
Which, however,
chaotically and through natural selection has already been
achieved by nature, without any intervention whatsoever... It
would be the next deduction... So possibly the intervention of
divinity would be related only to a possible event of subsequent
inescence of some energetic beings, potentially considerable to
be supernatural for the perceptions of apes, evolving
hominids...
And obviously this goal
remains the only "solution" of bringing together and certifying
both theories, of all human, scientific perceptions, described
in the posts made in the series "Beginnings"...
And I no longer complicate
the statement of this "starting" conclusion... It's totally
enough and that's it, for now...
So what could I do next
with this "New Medicine"?!? Body, mind, soul would be the main
landmarks to address... But what about medicine?!? What about
some minimal input elements that I feel need to be implemented,
as I've intuited right from the start of my posts in 2014?!?
So, we will discuss
"introductive" about life, then we will focus on a kind of
"staging" of man, in terms of the periods of his life (baby,
childhood, puberty, adolescence, adult and old age), how our
mind works, the interface between matter and soul, how our body
works, how our spirit works, and only then will I enter the
territory of current medicine and that of new medicine...
With materials about
medical diseases, diseases in terms of new medicine and many
other medical stuff or "new-medical opinions"... Now, in early
2015, I realized that going down the line of medicine, as I did
in 2014 and starting 2015, is a serious error...
Medicine has its own
materials, abundantly presented, documented and we have fallen
into the trap of the medical framework... I feel like I have to
deal with everything in a different order, the one that was
exposed earlier...
So, I know what to do and
I get to work...
But, well, I didn't finish
posting, even though I started with what was supposed to be the
end...
In addressing the human
story you could see that, for example, we analyzed the mind from
the point of view of the "proto-brain" as well as the brain...
Then we analyzed anthropologically, then we switched to the
microbiome, then to the souls...
Elements that I found
indisputable, at least in terms of the "curiosity" that I have
already discovered in the posts about matter...
This is why I will now
proceed to small "details" about certain comments "contrary",
both from the point of view of evolutionists and creationists...
As long as I plan to proceed like physicists, towards the
discovery of "unique formula/theory".
I will start with
something particularly important from my point of view, and the
authors accepted by me, even if it can be "commented" that it is
a predominantly creationist topic... Free will...
One of the basic divine
laws is, with certainty, free will... Natural selection would
not be something similar even by the impossibility of
influencing something chaotic, possibly "the law of the most
powerful who does what he wants"?!?
From the point of view of
evolutionists there are no problems from this point of view...
Everything is evolution, uncontrolled, often chaotic, towards
what it would be now, with or without considering the natural
selection but obviously based on the free will of the "muscles",
the fangs, the claws, the adaptation...
But in creationists, we're
dealing with big, real, palpable problems, apart from dogmas...
Dogma is dogma and you are not even allowed to discuss its
"edge" without becoming heretical, unfaithful or the like... So,
to continue the theme, we will consider a small "deliberation"
made previously...
We're all sinners, OK...
why?!? Either from what we have done in life, because,
necessarily, there is no man without sin, or "pulling" after
what our forefathers did, until the famous Adam, including...
And as a result of these sins, mistakes or whatever they may be,
we will have something to atone for...
For some faiths in the
great judgment that takes place immediately, or immediately
after death, after a time or at the end of time, for others in
the next lives through what will be karma or the like...
For the "immediate
atonement" version, it is clear that human judgment comes into
play, arbitrary, depending on the one who judges as an
individual or as a group, according to a human landmark, even if
it is attributed to divine "origins"...
Let me also remember that
Hitler did not break any German law?!? May I recall the
beheadings of Christians or Muslims to whom the fault of the
heretic or the infidel applies?!? Colonialism, racism, elitism,
nobility, etc?!? Of many landmarks of "immediate atonement", be
it delayed or staggered?!?
But this "atonement" is
only valid for the soul, the body "of flesh" being dead, burned,
buried or devoured at the "end of the road"... Possibly
"transmitted" further through the genes but also the environment
in which the body evolved, which will continue the forms of
organization, social, cultural, etc., especially in the case of
humans...
So anyway I twist the
problem, it's obvious that there's going to be something to
atone for...
But in all cases, even if
the materialist or "atheist" is also used to "you're dead and
done", where there's still a simple logic of "after me the
flood", something will follow, even if only for those left
alive?!?
Considering that
everything ends in the flesh, which is a phenomenal courage,
stressed by me in the introduction to all these posts about "New
Medicine" (the thing about "Whether you believe or not believe
in God and he doesn't exist you haven't lost anything, but if He
exists and you don't believe you've lost everything!"), it would
only be valid "immediate judgment", wouldn't it?!? Complicated
bet...
But how many times have
you been able to notice throughout your life that every deed has
been punished?!? And, especially, after the criteria (don't
forget Hitler)?!? I really can't understand those who keep
supporting this way of perceiving their existence...
It will all be just a
"game" of a lot in which everyone will do what they can,
pointlessly, aimlessly, apart from the intuitive or accepted
function of the environment, society, etc... Or aiming at a kind
of perpetuation of the "own gene" by inheritance to the
offspring, by "enrollment" in the ephemeralands and "adaptable"
history books and other similar landmarks...
But we're not talking
about an "exit" from the rules?!? About an "escape" from the
majority of evolution... Throwing atomic bombs and that's it, it
would be some kind of final solution... To which we seem to be
heading if we keep holding on to materialism...
From here, to the
happiness of the creationists, we come to "atonement" as a
goal... But from what we have presented so far, coming out of
the typical dogmas of creationists, it follows that the
atonement is an evolutionary matter, according to the conclusion
already presented... And so comes the paradox of free will...
To be equal before the
Absolute Divine Power, in the face of its judgment, we would all
have to be born "Adam"... Let us be put in his position and thus
appear a clear demarcation of the Atonement, in the sense of
"who atone and who does not", right?!?
But the reality is quite
different... We live in a body, under certain conditions with a
purpose, purpose... I think any creationist agrees with that...
But if we're talking about a destiny, then what about free will,
what can make a difference?!?
It is not just that we
exist to repent, to repent, to be humble, to suffer without
purpose and logic, to fear or not fear something that will
follow as a judgment?!? Even Jesus leaves much to be understood
by his "I did not come here for the faithful but for the
unbelievers!" even if His "speak" seems torn out of context...
So we reach the end,
destiny, fate, karma... But what does this end have to do with
free will?!? Most of us believe that the idea of free will is
opposed to that of destiny, fate, etc. But is that right?!?
Not fate, karma, etc. is a
result, the sum of our deeds, from... yes, from where?!? Of this
life?!? I have come to the conclusion that it is accepted by all
the earth's beliefs that it is an accumulation of lives lived
before the "current" ?!? Whether you want to accept it or not,
whether it's just a previous life or more, even if the "dogmas"
tell us that it's possible, even if we only consider Adam...
Or, then, if it comes down
to a lack of free will, we didn't get free will?!? We did not
enjoy freedom of choice?!?
But even these conditions,
we were born with all the king of France, caesareans or other
forms of independence "decision"?!? We all had as a mother Saint
Mary?!? Of course not! So, he's really going to drop the free
will thing...
So the "source" of the
problems tends to "fall" and rises to another reality, that of
free will in deliberately involving ourselves in such
experiences, at the risk of making mistakes and having to atone,
us and/ or our descendants, these mistakes, immediately or in
future lives...
Involvement that attracts
subsequent personal choices, for what?!? Not to check how he
will react to the events of a material life to "pull" or not the
consequences all in such a life?!? Does anyone else believe,
apart from dogmatics in the hell of penitence, the one populated
by mystical, scary beings, who can take the place of life in
material reality?!?
But then, why would we
need "conclusions" or what would anyone else need, even the
Supreme Being, the Presence, the Source, the Supreme Divine
Power, of these conclusions?!?
Re-incarnation would
certainly mean nothing if living in matter led to something
predestined, be it for "correction" or the elimination of
contradictions that existed or were "discovered" on the
"journey"... Then what could "stand up" ?!?
One argument in favour of
the idea that determinism is opposed to free will is that the
Supreme, or a group of secondary ramifications, primary to an
manifestation of the hologram, are responsible for the fact that
there are clear demarcations of "evolutionary material
environment", very clearly related to the material location and
the "resources" made available by it.
Something like a
school-study class demarcation... Where the benchmark would be
the desire to participate in the studies offered by each "study
class", by specialities, offers of study or other similar
criteria...
And, looking briefly at
the "Terra study class", we are dealing with many problems
represented by natural cataclysms, a terribly unjust social
system and other "details" over which there is not the slightest
chance of control, Earth, for example, being considered by souls
to be a very heavy "school", often referred to as the "school of
powerlessness", the great lesson of the Earth being to overcome
all destructive forces, individual or global, to emerge
strengthened from this effort and to go further by rejecting by
our essence even the insignificant appearance of such "next"
evolutionary statuses, to us or to anyone else.
In this school, to a large
extent, we come "equipped" with everything we need not to take
care of ourselves or loved ones, often the perception that fate,
karma, etc. may seem punitive, but to learn... What is fear,
what is acceptance, what is love, what is hate, what is
happiness, what is unhappiness, and so on, permanently
amplified, "adapted" to the moment of evolution of the soul...
For example, fear occurs
when we separate ourselves from our spiritual power... I have
known many times of the trials of this life, even before them
when I chose them, as souls who "proceeded" to incarnation, for
good reason. Even accidents involving our bodies are not
considered random by souls...
That's because the mere
will of our own self has the power to resist the weakness of our
own character, especially in adversarial circumstances... And
why not, because we have the freedom to rebuild our lives after
any catastrophe, if we are to assume this responsibility.
But, of any fact, all of
this seems to be terribly unfair "considerations" to the
bodies?!? What fault have the bodies, the expression in matter,
that the soul to call it "principal", the one who sent only a
small part of it into that body, decided that it must close I do
not know what contradiction by "living in matter", living that
brings pain, suffering, torments, etc?!?
Or, moreover, to close I
do not know what "blame" of the soul from I do not know what
experience in previous matter when another body, expression of
that moment of the soul, opposed, for example, and attracted the
"necessity" of an experience to be lived by the current body...
Or, even more, more
"painful", to be a soul that came to the aid that must close the
guilt of other souls with their bodies, their expression in
matter, which did not conform to the presence, actions, possibly
only the particularly useful advice of the soul that came to the
aid, in a "living in matter" previously...
Then, why not, there is
the possibility of "living" some "elements" necessary for the
future... What would the body have to do with something that
will have lived in another life, future?!?
Doesn't that seem like
everything terribly unfair, at least for the bodies?!? But at
the same time, isn't it all starting to make sense, both from
the point of view of materialists and creationists, both
considered "individual" and "cumulated" ?!?
Maybe that's where the
huge dose of negativity comes from about how bodies deal with
"spiritual" problems...
Some, the vast majority,
will put themselves before all fear, will be capped in dogmas,
and will remain anchored in the "first class" of experience, the
one in which they study and study everyday life, for material
purposes or not, possibly and the abecedar of accepted faith
embodied in Bibles, Koran and the like...
"Class I" which is not as
easy and easy as human schools but is often the most painful,
the most "obliging" class of "study"...
Others will climb, class
by class, in real perceptions, in acceptances, collaborations,
etc., depending on their spiritual constancy "touched" and not
necessarily existing, real. And, they'll get to college, but
just to practice accepting evolution in every way...
An acceptance that takes
into account a certain moment of evolution, of acceptance that
without light one cannot perceive darkness, that without good
there is no evil, regardless of the density and instability of
the factors involute, regardless of the density of the presence
of contradictions...
So they will "advance" but
will not be "left" by the "Class I" of those around them, whom
they will love regardless of hatred, resentment, harassment,
aggression that will be given to them "in exchange" for their
kindness and involvement...
The body, regardless of
their contradictory points of view, their honesty or dishonesty,
is created, exists because of the soul and, above all, for the
soul, it being the reflection of the soul, the limited identity
of the soul...
So, if we exist, both in
terms of body and soul, we exist in an intentionally imperfect
class of study, whether we consider the reality that we are
dealing with only one universe of many existing ones, each
having its own "Creator" governing on a kind of hierarchy of
competence, under this true pantheon, the divine being in our
divine house allowing it to govern in its own way, according to
their own powers of manifestation (see evolutionary example from
farmer to engineer presented above).
There would be one more
important detail for this "completion" introduction... If our
souls are the offspring of a divine soul, Father, Supreme Divine
Power, which becomes wiser, certain through our endeavor, then
it would not be best to evolve as quickly as possible, as best
as possible, so that He would be good according to our
individual desires, but also as a whole?!?
And by direct inference,
the concept that our immediate divinity is still evolving, that
it is only a part of something larger, that part that exists
within us, together with us, like us, does nothing to mind the
idea of an "Absolute Source" of perfection that gives birth to
our divinity.
Following the example of
the souls within us, more correctly a part of a soul that is
being in us, it is quite obvious that there is a supreme,
perfect deity that would not lose the all-powerfulness or
absolute control over all creation by allowing the maturation of
a less perfect, star, which has been delineated to reach by
experimentation the possibility of "retrieval" through
all-present perfection...
And, let us not forget,
more important than the events that live their body with the
soul is the individual or common reaction to them and how to
proceed in the face of their consequences, towards a definite
line of responsiveness, "tested" several times either during a
life, a body, or over the course of several lives, several
bodies...
Body which, like the soul,
even if it becomes more and more "perfect" in terms of
"accumulations" of experience, will still be forced to live the
"imperfection" for some contradictions or "sin" of a
"debtpast"...
Doesn't it seem like
there's even more "injustice", since, let's not forget that
everything the body lives and the soul part of it, then the
whole soul in it, and the whole "hierarchy" to the Presence...
Are we dealing with a
masochistic "Creator", eager to live pain in every possible
way?!?
Obviously I don't... The
"tips" that come from him, the "Love your neighbor as
yourself!", with "Don't judge!", "Don't steal or cheat!",
"Don't... many..." I'm not proof that he doesn't even like
fear?!? Doesn't He just want love, mutual help, construction,
perfection and the like?!?
There are certainly no
things to say to "dogmatics" or bigots, as there are no things
to say to those who suffer from, say, an incurable disease.
The suffering in matter,
at least earthly, is insidious, because it can block the healing
power of our soul, even our body, especially if we have not
accepted what happens to us either as an attempt established
before this existence or as a result of our opposition to a
situation in this life. Forgetting that no attempt at our lives
will be more than we can bear.
Then, why not, it is good
to remember that the aspects of divine interventions reflected
in this universe must remain in our ultimate reality, and if our
ultimate divinity is not the best, because of the use of
suffering as a learning tool, we must still accept it as the
best we have, in perfect accordance with who we are, and
consider our existence as a divine gift.
Like holy books that are
full of imperfections, interpretations, sometimes "cruel"
deviations from the "real path", but they are the only "paths"
that we have as a constructive "starting point"...
And now, in the world of
souls, it is time for there to be an increasingly powerful
movement that supports "changing the rules of the game in this
corner of the material universe".
That's because, in the
past, in early civilizations, souls were less amnesiac about
their selves and life after death, including re-incarnation.
And, it seems, in the last millennia, their eternal memories
have been "massively" locked on a conscious level, a factor that
has contributed to the loss of faith in our own transcendence.
Earth is now full of
material bodies that are trying to increasingly accentuate a
sense of emptiness and hopelessness for the meaning of life,
evolution. The absence of a connection with the immortal part of
us generates more and more anxiety in the world of souls who are
increasingly difficult to understand with their representations
in matter, with their bodies.
And perhaps that is why,
now, it is the "time" of the new medicine, a medicine of the
soul without being religion, dogma or perception "misunderstood
but present", a medicine that wants to restore the real nature
of man as a whole by restoring natural bonds body-mind-soul...
Because the body will be
"to the fullest" healthy under the conditions of collaboration
with a healthy mind and thus the soul will be able to sustain
more and more easily and certainly the whole of its
representation... Support that will only work under the
conditions of the complete assembly...
And, the complete
ensemble, "body-mind-soul" adapted to each "status" is the
"path" of what can be perceived by the term "New Medicine"!
And finally, we have
concluded what would be the introductory part, of knowledge, of
what will be a huge material of study, complementing knowledge
(as I presented "intuitively" earlier)... yes, that's what it's
like, "a huge study material"... At least because after finding
that 100,000 words we have not been able to distinguish too much
"palpable thing" (including after, now, at the start of 2017, we
have far exceeded 1,000,000 words)...
And in terms of the way I
work, I'm going to follow the pedagogical models of this
moment... Initially it will be a kind of cumulation of materials
like a kind of participation in a course where you make "class"
notes with everything you think is interesting, with everything
that you think is defining and you will need to be able to move
on from the path of knowledge...
Then comes that moment
when I will do my homework by synthesizing, structuring
everything I consider to be useful, discovering possible themes
of study, supporting some kind of final work, such as the work
of diploma or master's...
So, many years follow,
literally, of research, of accumulations and, why not, of
discoveries that I hope will be yours, the readers of these
lines...
Thank you to those who
have gone through these lines, thank you to those who will
continue!
That's what I feel, and
that's what I'm going to do for the rest of the years That I
have left, either as a kind of search of myself or as a response
to what I feel for many, already too many years, to carry out a
kind of mission that will materialize in a kind of cumulation of
materials that will, anyway, come under the gaze, analysis and
possibly your acceptance, of those who read...
To the Next time!
Bibliography (only on "The
Story of Man"): "Pe to Man" – History
Channel; "Great transitions: The Origin of Humans" – HHMI BioInteractive; "The First Human" – Timeline 6-01; "First Man" – Curiositystream; "The Journey of Man – A Genetic Odyssey" – National Geographic 56-49, The Human Microbiome: A New Frontier in Health, "Birth of a Civilization" – National Geographic, TEDx – Rob Knight: "How our microbes make us who we are" – University of California, TEDx – Warren Peters: "Gut Bugs and You", Ruairi Robertson, TEDx - Food for thought: How your belly controls your brain, "Your Inner Fish" (Episode 1), "Your Inner Reptile" (Episode 2), "Your Inner Monkey" (Episode 3) – An Evolution Story – Neil Shubin, PBS, The Incredible Human Journey – BBC, Origins – The Journey of Humankind – National Geographic, Michael Newton – "Destiny of Souls", "The Great Chance of Existence: Evolution and Development of Man" – Alice Roberts.
Channel; "Great transitions: The Origin of Humans" – HHMI BioInteractive; "The First Human" – Timeline 6-01; "First Man" – Curiositystream; "The Journey of Man – A Genetic Odyssey" – National Geographic 56-49, The Human Microbiome: A New Frontier in Health, "Birth of a Civilization" – National Geographic, TEDx – Rob Knight: "How our microbes make us who we are" – University of California, TEDx – Warren Peters: "Gut Bugs and You", Ruairi Robertson, TEDx - Food for thought: How your belly controls your brain, "Your Inner Fish" (Episode 1), "Your Inner Reptile" (Episode 2), "Your Inner Monkey" (Episode 3) – An Evolution Story – Neil Shubin, PBS, The Incredible Human Journey – BBC, Origins – The Journey of Humankind – National Geographic, Michael Newton – "Destiny of Souls", "The Great Chance of Existence: Evolution and Development of Man" – Alice Roberts.
Love, Gratitude and
Understanding (Namaste)!
Dorin, Merticaru