STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
Human's Life - The Baby (2)
Translation Draft
Without going into further
detail about the conscious or unconscious programming of our
babies, I will go straight to what most medical practitioners
consider to be really
important...
What is obvious the main needs of babies are food in the form of love and the ability to manifest the ability to observe the older ones living their daily lives. When babies in orphanages, for example, are held in cots and given only food, without the mother's touches, without exchanges of smiles and hugs, they experience long-term developmental problems.
A study of orphans in Romania concluded that lack of contact and attention in orphanages and children's hospitals stops the development of children and seriously affects their behaviour.
In this study, the level of cortisone (by taking saliva samples) of children and its links to behaviour (current experiment and later) was determined. It was found that the more stressed a child was, the more stress caused by the higher than normal level of cortisone in the blood, the worse the consequences...
Parallel research has shown the existence of crucial relationships between touch and cortisone secretion (I must no longer point out that it is some kind of stress hormone) and social development. Thus, babies (newborns) without physical contact with their mothers or social contact with those around their parents (or at least other adults who give them touches, positive feelings, etc.) have developed abnormal stress profiles and have become violent sociopaths or individuals characterized by autistic behaviors (at the divas of manifestation levels)...
It went even further... An assessment of human cultures was carried out based on how they raise their children. And it was concluded that if members of a society took their children in their arms, loved them and did not repress their sexuality, that culture was a peaceful, stable one. Such cultures are characterized by parents who maintain physical contact over long periods of time with their children, taking them, for example, to the chest or back throughout the day.
By contrast, societies that deprive their babies, children and adolescents of lasting touch inevitably have a violent character. One of the differences between these two types of populations is that many of the children who do not have physical contact suffer from somato-sensory affective disorders. This disease is characterized by the inability to physiologically suppress the high levels of stress hormones that precede violent episodes.
All these discoveries make us realize the cause of violence that is spreading anywhere in the world. Instead of agreeing to physical closeness, common medical and psychological practices often discourage her. Thus, from the unnatural intervention of doctors in the natural process of childbirth, for example, separating the newborn from the parents for extended periods in distant nurseries, to advising the parents not to respond to the screams of the baby for fear of spoiling him...
Such practices, based on signs on "science", undoubtedly contribute to the violence existing in our (global) society... Studies have shown that not only in adults (including "pre-adult phases") pleasure and violence have a relationship of reciprocity (the presence of one of them is carried out against the background of the decrease of the other)...
The mutual "pleasure-violence" relationship is important because certain sensory experiences in the period of formation, development, can create neuro-psychological provisions for violent typologies or for the "pacifist" ones that will be formed later...
What is more serious is that the link between abnormal social and emotional behaviors resulting from what psychologists call "maternal-social deprivation" caused by the lack of affection and love born by social norms...
For example, in the beliefs of some populations there is an innate violence related to sexual manifestations (and here I refer to the mother's games with her baby when both are naked and thus allowed free contact, free touch between them - proven to be one of the most stimulating and transmitters of love, touch and tender gestures)...
This also extends by the use of sexuality to support violence especially with regard to women, things that have deep roots in "holy books"... Let us also remember the isolation of babies that begins with its "presence" in maternity wards, then in the cradles and cots so used to have the freedom to do household chores, to go to work or simply to watch them television?!?
And these "elements" of development have been used since ancient times... Who knows how much history can remember the practices of the invading peoples of taking children and "raising" them to become future soldiers who will be used in future incursions or wars, often even against the populations from which they have taken (I refer here to the practice of the Ottomans of taking copies of "gaura" to be turned into ieniceri , and the examples can continue)...
Then, in our times, I do not think I should remember hitler-jungend and the practice of raising babies (later children, adolescents, adults) according to certain "typed" standards oriented exactly according to the patterns of lack of parental affection for increasing violent tendencies and, why not, the techniques of psychic "training" that are practiced experimentally and unofficially even in the most civilized states possible...
But what can we say about Romanian children who come from unathered backgrounds and become what a researcher called "lively marvels"? Why do some children thrive despite the history I mentioned above? Because they have better genes?!? It is obvious that it is not so (at least to a large extent)... It is most likely that their parents have provided a favourable prenatal and perinatal environment, such as good nutrition at crucial moments for the child's development.
The lesson for adoptive parents is that they should not pretend that the children's lives began from the moment they came under their protection. Those children may have already been programmed by natural parents in the belief that they are not wanted or cannot be loved.
In the happiest cases, they may have received positive messages from caregivers at a crucial stage for their development. if the adoptive parents will not be aware of pre and perinatal programming, they may be unable to deal realistically with post-adoptive problems.
They may not realize that children did not come to them in the form of "unwritten pages", especially since newborns do not come into the world unaffected by the nine months spent in the maternal uterus. It is good to realize the existence of the programming and try, if necessary, to change it.
So the message is clear to any kind of parent, your children's genes only reflect their potential, not their destiny (at least that's all I can say at this time of development of my posts – but we will fill in when the rest of the message needs to be completed).
It is up to you to provide an environment that allows children to develop to the maximum permitted by their potential... Let unfounded fears go away and be careful not to implant unnecessary fears and limiting beliefs into children's subconscious minds. You can help your children realize their potential and change your personal life...
Keep in mind that for human beings the most powerful promoter of development is not the most fashionable school, the most fancy toy (or the biggest, most expensive, etc.) but the time, love and gratitude you give them...
important...
What is obvious the main needs of babies are food in the form of love and the ability to manifest the ability to observe the older ones living their daily lives. When babies in orphanages, for example, are held in cots and given only food, without the mother's touches, without exchanges of smiles and hugs, they experience long-term developmental problems.
A study of orphans in Romania concluded that lack of contact and attention in orphanages and children's hospitals stops the development of children and seriously affects their behaviour.
In this study, the level of cortisone (by taking saliva samples) of children and its links to behaviour (current experiment and later) was determined. It was found that the more stressed a child was, the more stress caused by the higher than normal level of cortisone in the blood, the worse the consequences...
Parallel research has shown the existence of crucial relationships between touch and cortisone secretion (I must no longer point out that it is some kind of stress hormone) and social development. Thus, babies (newborns) without physical contact with their mothers or social contact with those around their parents (or at least other adults who give them touches, positive feelings, etc.) have developed abnormal stress profiles and have become violent sociopaths or individuals characterized by autistic behaviors (at the divas of manifestation levels)...
It went even further... An assessment of human cultures was carried out based on how they raise their children. And it was concluded that if members of a society took their children in their arms, loved them and did not repress their sexuality, that culture was a peaceful, stable one. Such cultures are characterized by parents who maintain physical contact over long periods of time with their children, taking them, for example, to the chest or back throughout the day.
By contrast, societies that deprive their babies, children and adolescents of lasting touch inevitably have a violent character. One of the differences between these two types of populations is that many of the children who do not have physical contact suffer from somato-sensory affective disorders. This disease is characterized by the inability to physiologically suppress the high levels of stress hormones that precede violent episodes.
All these discoveries make us realize the cause of violence that is spreading anywhere in the world. Instead of agreeing to physical closeness, common medical and psychological practices often discourage her. Thus, from the unnatural intervention of doctors in the natural process of childbirth, for example, separating the newborn from the parents for extended periods in distant nurseries, to advising the parents not to respond to the screams of the baby for fear of spoiling him...
Such practices, based on signs on "science", undoubtedly contribute to the violence existing in our (global) society... Studies have shown that not only in adults (including "pre-adult phases") pleasure and violence have a relationship of reciprocity (the presence of one of them is carried out against the background of the decrease of the other)...
The mutual "pleasure-violence" relationship is important because certain sensory experiences in the period of formation, development, can create neuro-psychological provisions for violent typologies or for the "pacifist" ones that will be formed later...
What is more serious is that the link between abnormal social and emotional behaviors resulting from what psychologists call "maternal-social deprivation" caused by the lack of affection and love born by social norms...
For example, in the beliefs of some populations there is an innate violence related to sexual manifestations (and here I refer to the mother's games with her baby when both are naked and thus allowed free contact, free touch between them - proven to be one of the most stimulating and transmitters of love, touch and tender gestures)...
This also extends by the use of sexuality to support violence especially with regard to women, things that have deep roots in "holy books"... Let us also remember the isolation of babies that begins with its "presence" in maternity wards, then in the cradles and cots so used to have the freedom to do household chores, to go to work or simply to watch them television?!?
And these "elements" of development have been used since ancient times... Who knows how much history can remember the practices of the invading peoples of taking children and "raising" them to become future soldiers who will be used in future incursions or wars, often even against the populations from which they have taken (I refer here to the practice of the Ottomans of taking copies of "gaura" to be turned into ieniceri , and the examples can continue)...
Then, in our times, I do not think I should remember hitler-jungend and the practice of raising babies (later children, adolescents, adults) according to certain "typed" standards oriented exactly according to the patterns of lack of parental affection for increasing violent tendencies and, why not, the techniques of psychic "training" that are practiced experimentally and unofficially even in the most civilized states possible...
But what can we say about Romanian children who come from unathered backgrounds and become what a researcher called "lively marvels"? Why do some children thrive despite the history I mentioned above? Because they have better genes?!? It is obvious that it is not so (at least to a large extent)... It is most likely that their parents have provided a favourable prenatal and perinatal environment, such as good nutrition at crucial moments for the child's development.
The lesson for adoptive parents is that they should not pretend that the children's lives began from the moment they came under their protection. Those children may have already been programmed by natural parents in the belief that they are not wanted or cannot be loved.
In the happiest cases, they may have received positive messages from caregivers at a crucial stage for their development. if the adoptive parents will not be aware of pre and perinatal programming, they may be unable to deal realistically with post-adoptive problems.
They may not realize that children did not come to them in the form of "unwritten pages", especially since newborns do not come into the world unaffected by the nine months spent in the maternal uterus. It is good to realize the existence of the programming and try, if necessary, to change it.
So the message is clear to any kind of parent, your children's genes only reflect their potential, not their destiny (at least that's all I can say at this time of development of my posts – but we will fill in when the rest of the message needs to be completed).
It is up to you to provide an environment that allows children to develop to the maximum permitted by their potential... Let unfounded fears go away and be careful not to implant unnecessary fears and limiting beliefs into children's subconscious minds. You can help your children realize their potential and change your personal life...
Keep in mind that for human beings the most powerful promoter of development is not the most fashionable school, the most fancy toy (or the biggest, most expensive, etc.) but the time, love and gratitude you give them...
Silence and faith on this
day of rest!!!
Dorin, Merticaru