To STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
Start of
the Year 2015 (4) - Intermission
Translation draft
This will be a post that will not contain much related to the
general topic of this blog. It's just going to be some kind of
overview of how I'm going to approach things from now on. So,
those who are running out of time it is good to pass for this
post (Thanks for understanding them!!!). Or maybe it'll be more
important to them... Each with his own interests...
In short, from all the discussions, lectures, feedbacks so far
we have reached "quickly" the need for this post...
In many of the discussions I have had with those who participate
in this effort of mine, directly or indirectly, I have been
asked why I am doing this, what is the rationale, etc...
Honestly, I don't know why... So far (after more than 15 years
of direct or indirect efforts in this direction) I have not
gained anything (material, I mean)... Apart from my own
experience... Possibly of some fame, be it "easy"...
And since we've gained experience, it's appropriate that it be
reflected in the presentation of the materials and not only in
their content...
The first complaint, by frequency, over the years mentioned, was
that the materials are too big, too bushy, etc... I've tried
countless times to make succinct, "spartan" material, but
there's not much im deeping about such an approach... Possibly
for connoisseurs would be a solution... But I will comply and
insert clear conclusions that "focus the ideas of each post"...
Then it is about the level of knowledge of the readers
("knowers" of which I mentioned earlier)... This is not about
quantitative knowledge, as it would seem at first glance
(although it is also more important than you would imagine)...
It's about what could be described by the phrase "orientation of
knowledge"... And here's what's next...
Everything I've posted so far has been a kind of accumulation of
"class notes" (in a kind of "class notebook"). But now, the time
has come to proceed with the passage of these notes "on the
clean" (or on the "theme book", if I may say so). This becomes
particularly serious (at least from my point of view) and thus
needs to be clarified for you what is to come.
Years of discussion (direct or virtual) with those like you
(perhaps with some of you) have revealed to me that any
argument, training, consultation or the like must be "staggered"
on a structure of three levels of perception (in terms of
"auditor", critical or not but also in terms of "orientation of
knowledge"): 1. materialist-dialectics (or "materialists"),
2. those who believe in a "third"
divine existence (or "worshippers") and 3. those who believe in
their own divine existence from and through the general ensemble
of divinity (or "divinators" - attention, in the sense perceived
by me, the divinator has more meaning of "penetrating",
"knowing", "seeing or predicting knowing" and has the ability to
divine, to be the part that holds and manifests the divine
hologram - about these things later).
In short materialists, worshipers and divinators (I mention that
this is a "classification" of its own that was born from direct
interactions with you, interactions that, over time, forced me
to structure any presentations, any dialogues after these
structures of perception/belief identified by me).
It is something similar to philosophical "manifestations" where
human "perceptions" are divided on a kind of scale between
materialists and idealists, or like politics where everything is
divided into a kind of scale between left and right. In the case
of the "classification" identified by me it is obvious that the
"right" is value-related with "materialists", the "centre" is
similar to worshipers and the "left" is similar to divinators.
But let me get into the details!
Materialists - are a category that is correctly based on their
senses and direct "processing" (as individuals or group of
individuals) at their own mental level.
From their point of view the world is made up entirely of
matter, nature, existence in genera, all events, acts and states
of things being either subordinated or completely reduced to
material things and connections between them, the "world" being
essentially material and cognoscible.
The term used by me, materialistic-dialectics comes to describe
those who fall as belonging to the "communist forms" (of Marx
and Engels) who "localize" people who see everything as subject
matter governed by objective laws such as the law of
quantitative accumulations and qualitative leaps, the law of
unity and the fight against opposites, the law of denial of
denial, etc.
They are the individuals somewhat more advanced (in my view)
than the "total" materialists in that they "make some problems"
regarding the "relationship" between matter and consciousness,
about the most general laws of "movement" and the development of
nature, society and knowledge.
Let it not be understood that individuals who "find themselves"
here have no beliefs! Some believe in money/material purchases,
others in personal success/track record, others in family,
girlfriend, children, others in personal preparation (either
spiritual, but without "touch" to true beliefs) and many, many
other milestones.
To this "section" of beliefs fall and atheists who, even if they
believe only in them, obviously limit themselves only and only
to matter. From my point of view the "pain" of the problem lies
in the fact that matter is the prime factor and consciousness is
the derivative factor, reduced, of course, to matter.
For this category I will "provide" maximum efforts in everything
I do at "New Medicine" (or "New Knowledge"). For them it is
necessary to structure the presentation of the data inserted
from a kind of "zero" level and I need to present everything
from matter from the point of view of both Newtonian physics and
quantum physics, going into detail into all matter-related
problems.
Here will be in my attention especially the doctors who need to
fill in the gaps in the "cognoscible universe" so necessary to
the progress of their "curiosity" and, implicitly, their "adking
over knowledge" and their removal from the status of
"self-sufficiency" and "elitism" in which they have perched
without any right (at least most of them)...
Worshippers - are a category that is rightly based on a
"balance" between a third supernatural divinity/power/force
(Holy Power, Uniqueness, God, Father, Son, The Holy Spirit,
Allah, Buddha, etc.) the creative and governing of the universe
and the "material" manifestation of the individual concerned (of
the social consciousness that includes the individual) in the
environment, both directly and "framed" in the whole/system of
beliefs (dogmas) and ritual acts required by the cult around
that divinity (supernatural forces, etc.), as well as regarding
the feeling of divinity that unites members adhering to the same
spiritual and moral community "governed" by that deity.
Here, the "species" that can be inferred are multiple, the
starting point being that the set of ideas, feelings and actions
shared by the individual or the group to which he adheres (in
fact, adherence, acceptance of the "object" of worship, code of
behavior and frame of reference required to enter into the
relationship with this "object" as well as with its members ,
even with the universe) is often controversial by even the core
members, being almost impossible to associate the "material"
behavior of the individual "transposed" with the help of rituals
to the third divinity, particularly controversial, in turn.
More "directly", as long as a man's analysis starts from the
"original sin", binding and undeniable, from the division into
the "meritorious man" and "sinful woman", from the faithful and
the infidels, etc. it is obvious that there will be all kinds of
situations that contradict that divinity or, worse, cause the
stigmatization of those who adhere to it for minor mistakes that
, then justify the "big mistakes" (sins).
And so, we are dealing with individuals who "believe in
something" but without other "obligations", individuals who seek
escape into that divinity and become more or less habotnic and,
last but not least, those who know, one do and do not matter
anything else (like "mercy, humility, humility", as is the case
with "jihad", , "hell is yours that you have not stepped on to
church", "although that person prays 2-3 times when he arrives
in the church on Sunday while others pray with all their heart
and faith 2-300 times a day, but really do not bear the
Phariseeism encountered "somewhere" and the examples can
continue).
From my point of view their problem is that they disavow their
own action (possibly become the "tool of the Lord" or abandon
themselves in His arms or use), even their own feelings and
beliefs, in direct "comparison" with what is divine (with what
is required to be divine in us, when it is said very clearly
that , we are made "in His image and likeness") and are
"compared" (they subscribe, even by accession, to an external,
illusory and arbitrary reference point) only with the direct and
indirect rules of the system of dogmas and ritual acts accepted
by them and requested to be "forgave", "sent to heaven, to his
right" or "... among virgins" or the like.
This category is the most sensitive of all, the most difficult
to address because this is about beliefs (own, structured in
time, full of highly educated "promoters") of faith (in God,
Allah, Buddha and others). My intention is not to "change"
something in their smattering of faith but to "stir" them to
understand the true message of the Godhead, regardless of form,
idol or anything similar.
They only need to accept things like the "cising" of the face of
Jesus in the picture of suffering perched on the cross of
suffering in the image of Jesus who counsels, supports, heals
and "is in each of us" in support of the saving, protective
cross, etc. We each have our mission and that's what we need to
understand.
And so, the worshipers, come up with the strongest arguments
related to inertia, humility, religious obedience, etc. and it
is very difficult to get over the arguments existing over their
conviction even if, obviously, everything has the same meaning.
, who have little tangents to the way of the Godhead) without
seeing that Jesus did not go to church or temple to spread the
power of God, to be among men, to help and guide, and worse, he
was considered worthy of death because he did not go "that way"
or because he "went over" the interests of the servants of a
cult...
Deh, who am I to reckon that God is everything and we are part
of God?!? Who am I to reckon that I have come to this earth to
love, to be loved, and to share as much love as I can by
learning from my more enlightened fellowmen, including from what
I live in and in the Godhead, and by teaching my fellowmen less
enlightened all that is possible. yes, who am I?!?
And, clearly, time has proved
that they are the ones who, in the face of indisputable
arguments, do not question what they believe (attention, not in
what they believe, divine person or whole "religious")...
They simply repudiate and reject everything under the cover of
"Stop disturbing my faith, Satan!" ... Including, "You are
Satan's messenger, you believe in Satan!" ...
I can give many details but any dialogue of this kind ends in
"My faith is true faith! You believe in Stana and you'll pay,
you'll cry!!!" ... Both believe in God, the Holy Spirit and
Christ! He decides that his God is the one, the real, and every
argument is Satan's, and he must be punished... Attention,
punished!!! Forgetting that only God judges, that they have no
right to do so...
But enough with this "sector", let's move on!
Divinators - are a category that rightly relies on their high
and much cultivated personal experience in contact with the
divinity or, whatever the circumstances, on the enlightenment
received as a result of an event more or less dramatic but
certainly what has attracted awakening, enlightenment or as each
one calls it.
Of course, these individuals have the "support" of a knowledge
and often higher perceptions that manifest themselves either
from birth or from leaving that "more or less dramatic" event
that I mentioned, or at a certain critical point "trigger"
(critical mass) of knowledge (and here I do not necessarily mean
the level of knowledge because Knowledge is rapidly dissociated
from the level of knowledge through an almost All-knowing).
They are the people who feel directly from and through God
(consciously or not), create "in His image and likeness" and who
feel that "I will be in each of you" or "I am who I am". They
are the ones who know that the Godhead lives through us every
pain but also every joy, however apparent, real or unreal it
is... They know that the Godhead demands love and deed for all
its work, as a whole, with or without understanding what is
going on...
Because we all need joy, love, support... And the closest divine
ensemble is the one in which we exist, being... Not everyone is
involved in solving their mission, but they know everything they
need, quite often, only the friendship, support, advice, etc. of
those like them.
In their direction my efforts will be minimal because they
already know everything they need. Maybe that's why I chose my
presentations to be a kind of streaming (free broadcast on the
topic of one or more ideas) of how I feel... Eventually I'll be
a friend who's happy to be waiting for them to talk and, why
not, that he can access other things than what he knew.
And, here, I will finish with this presentation of my
information-presentation boundaries...
In conclusion, any post will follow will have a kind of "logo
insertion" regarding the general membership of the following
text (of the post) to certain delimited classes: materialists,
worshipers and divinators...
Don't forget the conclusions they'll seek to synthesize anything
that can be summarized from that post...
In addition, there will be a general structuring of all my
efforts. It is obvious that I will also need to write the
materials for young children. I don't know yet, how I'm going to
do it, but I'm going to do it. All things about our strength
must be accessible from an early age to earn as much as possible
on our journey around here.
Note 2017: To some extent I have discovered the way to creating
a kind of computer game (cellular) with which to help children's
perception of these "desires" higher than what the material
world can offer... But it is still a long time before I manage
to "get on" this work, leaving the parents who go through these
lines the role of parent, element of selection and propagation
of some teachings "at some point"...
Obviously, in the short "descriptions" I did not go into details
because this is not the "object" / my target now ... I simply
presented some "generally valid" things that I noticed in the
direct or virtual dialogues with those who arrived around me.
Thank you for your understanding and patience!
Love, Gratitude and
Understanding!