STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The Life (Part 4) - About Life
Translation Draft
We've already gone through
a lot of interesting things about genetic "material", about the
information stored at the level of every cell in every living
organism... That something that allows us, under certain
conditions and possibilities of involvement, to react to a given
environment...
Power is knowledge, it
would already be a definite conclusion... What's more, there's
also an old saying "world-class"...
At our human level as a
genetic material, this would translate into "The more you know,
the more you are able to survive and succeed"... But in a direct
antithesis everything turns into "Lack of knowledge determines
the lack of power"...
And, as we saw in the
previous post, the "knowledge" we have about the power of the
genotype (how genes control certain aspects of life) is pretty
much wrong... Even if science succeeds from one day to the next
to remove the previous "mistakes" of perception, there will be
tens, maybe hundreds of years before the perception exceeds a
kind of weight of "50% + an individual"... Weight that will help
to understand our nature and, why not, to understand the work of
Divine Power.
But let us return to our
current level and debate a little more about genetic material,
on the subject of our direct, undeniable inheritance.
Starting from the genetic
inheritance "handed" by our parents, how does it come to
influence our lives all of a sudden??? How to take into account
that we are a victim of heredity (apart from the unfortunates
that make up the share of 5 - 6% of us who.... really are)???
Why should we be affected by genetic line considerations such as
those relating to cardio-vascular predispositions, diabetes and,
not ultimately, cancer???
Why should we believe that
our whole life will be nothing more than a run of programs that
have been transmitted to us through genes by parents, without
the slightest ability to complete, correct, etc. this "error"?
Because it would all be
someone else's fault, thus eliminating our efforts in an
"already accepted" direction... In our case, it would most
commonly be the fault of parents who thought only of the
pleasant "technological process" of procreation and did not want
to take into account our possible "sick ready-to-life launch"?!?
Isn't it because of these
perceptions that we come to "give birth" to the belief that
nothing can be done anyway because that is the legacy and no one
can do anything? And, right now, the lack of power is coming to
manifest itself...
Hence the assertion that
it will take tens, perhaps hundreds of years, to realize in a
weight that "counts", what potential we have at our disposal...
But, yes, that's right, let's get to work!
The time has come to "keep
my word" and talk about proteins, to complete the "chain of
determinism" of the mind on DNA, RNA, including the
functionality of the cell and/ or body as a symbiote as a whole
(I did everything in my power not to stun you with too much
technical stuff but, and it's their time)...
In the human body there
are about 70,000 protein elements of vital importance,
especially since the human cell is "made" mostly of protein.
And since life is
movement, almost everything is due to the movement of these
proteins... Literally movement or "movement" from a chemical
point of view (in which the molecule changes its structure under
the action of a stimulus that alters the "local" electrical
charge, causing the structure of that molecule to change - which
causes researchers to identify a static and an active form in
proteins... movement)...
That's how proteins get to
determine behavior, movement... Being able to "reach" the
behavior and actions that the individual has in life...
Summarizing everything to
a kind of definition comes down to the statement: behavior is
the action of a protein that interacts with a signal, activates
the movement of the protein and the movement generates behavior.
So the action is determined by control of the signal...
In our case, control is
provided by the cell membrane with "re-uses" at the level of
internal or external regulation and control components, but also
by the brain with the nervous system with the "re-uses" at the
level of the adjustment and control components.
If a cell is isolated from
the environment, it wouldn't behave anymore... She'd be
inactive, stationary, lifeless. Life is given by the existence
of the cell's response to the environment... Human life is given
by the way the individual responds to the environment,
regardless of his own considerations, his own functionality.
By customizing on the
cell, I have already come to the conclusion that the old claims
that the nucleus is the "brain" of the cell is obvious that they
are not exactly right (as can be inferred from all the posts so
far)... It can be "associated" at most with gonads (sexual
organs), the reproductive part of the cell.
The nucleus, with the help
of the gene components at its level, has everything necessary,
like the use of a design board, to create the 70,000 different
elements of the body without knowing which is the necessary and
when.
The core has no
intelligence, it's just a pattern, a storehouse of patterns...
For example, cancer genes have nothing to do with genetic
transmission, although many medical sources link cancer to
genetic "degenerations" or the like.
Even if we assume there is
a genetic predisposition, genes don't activate themselves as
they can't deactivate themselves. Without the sustained activity
of many forms of RNA, the genetic manifestation at the level of
chromosomes, nucleus, would not even exist.
So the concept that there
is a cancer gene is false. Think about what it would be like to
have such a gene! An individual with a gene like that should
have it manifest right from the moment of birth because as soon
as cell division is triggered, the gene will start to do its
job...
Or, in a "more technical"
expression, "when the response (product) of a gene is needed, a
signal from its environment and not an intrinsic property of the
gene itself activates the expression of the gene"... or, in
short, "a signal from the environment activates the expression
of the gene"... The old formula tells us that, "Genetics is a
weapon, lifestyle pull the trigger"...
Here comes another
"protein" thing... DNA is not freely found in the nucleus but
under the shell of a protein layer inside the chromosomes (as we
have presented in previous posts)... For something to act on the
gene or to use its information it is necessary to first pass
this protein protection (which is, moreover, a kind of access
cipher)...
This access can only be
done under the influence of different signaling factors
perceived and "interpreted" at the membrane level, so following
a response to the environment... or... It is the environment
that selects the genes to be used, not the genes themselves.
Physically, different
forms of RNA cause repositioning of this protein layer that will
allow the "coupling" of that RNA exactly in areas where there is
the correct "information" to the signalling elements existing in
that RNA. And, this coupling obviously unveils the protein layer
exactly where appropriate, allowing the replication elements,
restructuring of the "markers" carried by RNA and many other
typical, characteristic processes...
Interestingly, more and
more researchers are starting to discover some kind of quantum
transfer mechanism, like the one we presented in water posts.
Let me also present to you this mechanism that "describes" much
more effectively this process of identifying the DNA area where
the useful information is located, the way of "coupling", etc?!?
Moreover, it appears that
the protein structure is an 'undifferentiated' stem structure,
and, in fact, it is not a direct coupling with the genetic
material but a kind of protein 'reformation' reaction, depending
on the possibility of "copying" the formed assembly, which would
give the perception of the "old geneticists" that a kind of
"direct replication contact" would be made...
So what would be the great
role of DNA in such processes?!? Whereas the role of RNA is
clear. A definite role correlated with the requirements for
response to the internal or external environment.
Concluding "finally", the
cell's behavior is influenced by environmental factors, by the
environmental signals by the specific proteins in the membrane
that convert that signal into a true "behavioral signal" that
controls the cell's functional response to environmental
conditions. Without a signal there is no behavior, everything
being like a "stimulus-response" answer...
But this behavior is not
programmed, it has the ability to change according to
environmental conditions, cellular needs, etc. constantly
adapting to any (or most) signals in the environment.
Which mechanism, by
repetition, by amplitude of "optimal" manifestation, will
produce structural changes not only at the level of the cell
membrane, as described in previous posts, that also internally,
as found in ribosomal structures, in terms of mitochondrial
density, and many other landmarks.
Structural changes that
are also found in cells that will take the place of "death",
either by genetic transfer, as some researchers claim, or by
stem development, as other researchers claim. But in both cases,
structural changes are perpetuated, whether they are "good" or
"bad" for the future cell in that tissue, whole, organism...
This leads to a mutation,
called by scientists as an "adaptive mutation"... Within this
mutation, genes do not change randomly but in response to
adaptive needs to the environment...
In short, the environment
controls mutations, the genes are permanently adapted for the
body to adapt permanently to the environment... Obviously it's
impossible for the "reaction" to be in reverse...
In all the experiments
that were carried out, this statement could be verified without
problems, according to all the scientific criteria particularly
demanding for this way to look "revolutionary" things. In
addition, as a result of these studies, in addition to the
result of "we adapt our genes to suit the environment" came the
completion "in which we believe we live"... And it is not only
the case of the human individual, this "behaviour" being
"seized" in other life forms, regardless of their "positioning"
on the "tree of life".
Yes, you read correctly,
especially the "we believe we live" part!
I won't "divag" much on
this topic because it will be "generous" dealt with in future
posts. But I will remind you of the experiment with the lamb
placed near the wolf, the one in which, living in terror, he
will die even if he is in a condition of total security, of
abundant nutrition, etc.
In conclusion, this is due
to a certain reality that proves that the perception can be
correct or erroneous (as if it was still needed, especially in
the case of humans). In the case of misperceptions, the living
organism reacts based on what it thinks it must respond...
Possibly anticipates, reflex most of the time... And the si...
As such, perception becomes either faith or reflex, depending on
the "exercise" of the environmental factor.
So can it be said that
genes end up being altered by faith? That our own beliefs end up
selecting our genes, and if we don't have the right genes to
withstand stress from environmental factors, faith will rewrite
genes, trying to achieve that. Everything reaching the automatic
and "natural" reflex?!?
Another "little
experiment" would clarify a little what was said above... When
muscle cells are taken from dystrophic patients, in most cases
when placed in a favorable environment, the cells will begin to
grow normally and healthily although they did not initially do
so in the body from which they were taken, developing
"abnormally".
Thus, the "correction" of
the environment attracts the "correction" of functional errors
and thus the current medical world, of the Western type, draws
the conclusion that essentially coordinates its activity, that
of correcting evolutionary factors.
But what happens in the
case of the other cells, those that continue to develop
"erroneous", in dissonance with the environment which, this time
is perfect (or almost perfect)?!?
Well, here I have to do
the "installation" of the reflex response... That would be an
explanation... But, which explanation, falls under conditions
where cell multiplication is favored in that perfect
environment, multiplication that should produce healthy cells,
in normal functional parameters and not morbidity.
It is right that the
reflex response is difficult to "remove" but colonies made up of
"morbid" cells will have a certain course, slowly, of
"reformation", of eliminating functional problems, even if
perfect environmental conditions are preserved.
Extrapolating this process
from cells to symbioted, multicellular organisms, including in
the case of humans, it was possible to "detect" the
explanation... It's about what the individual thinks about that
environment, an opinion that doesn't take into account reality
but how the individual is able to perceive... So, faith or
perception?!? I don't think There's any need to argue the only
possible answer, that it's about faith.
Why is that? Because
somewhere between the environment and the cell, between the
environment and the body, there is an interpose perception,
which even when the environment is good but is incorrectly
interpreted, or simply imagined, requested or other similar
landmarks, the "blockage" of faith occurs, things no longer go
as they should.
From here comes what Bruce
Lipton masterfully defined under the phrase "Biology of
Faith"...
So there is a lot of
"control" over our lives that is mediated by the perception of
the environment. And to move forward, not only does perception
activate behavior, not only does perception activate genes, but,
when necessary, perception rewrites genes...
You will get a lot of
detail in everything that follows because this is also the basis
of the new medicine, identification and use of perception,
belief, or similar formulations to complement the "classic"
medical effort in acute cases or, more importantly, to "control"
perceptions, beliefs, etc. in order to have a "prophylactic
position" and, why not, to "control" the performance of our
organism, including with the objective of transmitting "quality"
genetic material to our offspring.
It's just, for "skeptics,"
there's a big problem... Why would it be necessary to rewrite
the genes??? They're not well written enough??? Nature or Divine
Power has not done its job properly as long as we already
benefit from so much perfection?!?
Here creationists should
"leave" the ground of debate for two reasons! The first would be
that no "holy work" fails to repeat and repeat the degradation
of the divine work by constantly encouraging its righting... And
the second would be that he forgets, for example in the case of
Christians, that Adam's sin was "paid" or "redeemed" or some
other invocation of the "jertification" of His Son,
as for the evolutionists,
the "new" of "outdated" or erroneous genes in the long history
of life, especially with regard to extinct species, proves that
this "genetic" evolution is very "dangerous", even if its result
is crowned with the perfection of ecosystems, including the
perfection embodied in Homo Sapiens.
Moreover, almost always,
when rewriting genes, this is initially found to be incorrect,
because the genes were already working. But lest, if you've gone
through previous posts, there's always some kind of genetic
ensemble that can't be reduced to a simple individual, whether
it's necessarily some kind of identification of the original
gene or a landmark marker?!?
So, this evolution
literally needs genetic modification, transmissible and
transmitted, interacting with other genetic changes and, from
symbiosis, use, manifestation, adaptation, etc. to reach the
optimal genetic end product.
That's why new medicine,
even "classic" doctors identify that a lot of diseases such as
cancer (95% of cancers have no hereditary links whatsoever)
occur as a product of individual active perceptions, rewriting
normal genes by making them carcinogenic. Whether these
perceptions are "food habits", "polluted environment" that
reflect an "industrial" habit of the place, the area, etc...
Finally, beware!!! Beliefs
affect (alter) our biology continuously at all times! That must
be retained for the time being! And, enough for today!
The weekend break is
over... So I wish you a light and spontaneous week at what you
want!!!
Dorin, Merticaru