To STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine

The New
Medicine - Introduction (4)
Translation draft
Spirit, this is the theme of today's brief introductory
"discussion"...
And when I say spirit, I don't
mean ghosts or anything like that... I simply have in mind,
reason, intellect, thinking, consciousness and all that can be
included in our manifestations "extra matter" (if I can use such
a term), being, effectively, at most a "response" of matter and,
in no way, something associable real matter, a palpable product
of it...
I will start from the slightest "part" of the manifestations of
the spirit, the one related to its smallest manifestation on and
together with our body, the simple act of birth... Everything
starts from the simple gesture (manifested between people
different to us – which has no tangency with us, literally,
those who were born or participate as parents in the birth of
someone else) of the manifestation of love, bodily possession,
artificial insemination, or each as it had, which has as its end
the act of procreation,...
Classical medicine has studied the phenomenon and things are
pretty clear at the moment... XX, XY, genes, stages of
intrauterine development, etc., etc., etc. The proof of the
correctness of the observations lies in the fact that artificial
insemination is a confirmed practice, the explorations that can
be made reveal everything possible, including possible genetic
problems of the body that will result from the act of birth,
etc., etc., etc. As evidence, come the medical achievements in
which it was successful to maintain pregnancy in people
(mothers, of course) who are brain dead, leading to the birth of
a viable child... So, a child born to a long-dead mother (not an
immediate expulsion, consequence of death, and forced
termination of the gestation process)... But it all depends on a
certain stage of embryo development... From the moment its
viability occurs...
Now comes the act of cloning... It turned out that "this" is
also possible, that all medical conquests have a clear
certification (even with a reduced possibility of using the term
"finality") that is... But this also is related to certain
conditions, cloning being nothing more than a relatively natural
reconstitution using techniques of genetic specificity (it takes
real genetic material and not created "from scratch", it is
necessary for this material to be placed in a complex
environment, as "completed" by natural (and not by something
artificial that resembles/ is compatible with "natural"), then,
even if it is known of X and Y can not determine sex at birth or
cloning according to these criteria, etc., etc. - with direct
reference to complex organisms and not to bacteria, worms or the
like that, anyway, can not be created even now "from
scratch"...) ...
So it all depends on a certain moment when something comes up...
"The viability of the embryo", says the "classic" doctors, the
existence of the soul (or something similar, compatible)
intuitively say almost all of us, regardless of education or
medical education, possibly the existence of a single matrix of
life, the one that corrects the genetic code in the case of
controlled genetic mutations (which ensures a kind of "viability
of the product" and after the 2nd – 3rd generation brings it to
its original form (regardless of the mutations to which it was
subjected, obviously, subject to the much-needed viability to
reach a certain number of generations) – you will see in future
posts). Take a test with those around you and you will be amazed
by the finding of... what I told you before...
Moreover, this "finding" is also maintained in the accounts that
come from the world of souls. The fetus is cared for, built,
etc. by the souls of the mother and father in a relative
collaboration (can be even without) with the soul to which the
future body will belong, up to a certain point, the one
previously called "viability". From this point, the existing
"product" (the fetus) is cared for particularly carefully by the
future soul that will "live" with it. Yes, you read it right!
The soul is involved in convincing the body in the sense of
working as well as possible for... All in their own time. Then,
it is known, the fetus until around the age of 4 months and a
little over is the girl (female). Yes, surprise! We're all girls
up to this point when some fetuses start differentiating in
boys. But that's not what I wanted to point out.
"I was talking" about souls. If the soul comes later from this
"delimitation" there is a good chance that it will have problems
collaborating with the body because there may be differences in
the majority "sex". And so are born "male women" or "girl"
(without going with "logic" to the extremes, in my view and
beyond, represented by homosexuality, which "belong" exclusively
to the manifestations of the body). So it's all about a specific
moment, when something comes up, no matter what our reporting,
our point of reference.
We return to materialism, to skepticism!!! Let's say that
medicine has not yet discovered all the elements and will one
day be able to banish any perception of this spirit/soul, this
matrix of uniqueness that we mentioned earlier. So, our baby is
born, a wonderful little girl or a promising if, gal, Viking,
etc... We're starting to notice everything he does, either out
of a desire to take care of him as best we can or without
wanting to, what matters... Angels can't pass without being
noticed. Inevitably, as time goes on, the first problems, first
gestures, and first ailments arise. The doctor (pediatrician or
not), respect for his efforts and dedication, is with us in the
struggle for angels to be as healthy and powerful as possible...
But some of us are unable to help the children. What "roads" it
exceeds the doctor's ability to do something. The roads take us
where we are available to each of us. It doesn't matter what and
how but we have to heal the chicken.
And, some of us end up on the doctor's or doctors' colleagues
who have helped us so far, for example, those in charge of
homeopathy. "Stupids", "placebo effect"... or others... they're
going to exclaim or hurt our doctors. It does not matter that
the person who administered the contested treatment is a doctor
like them. We see right in many cases. But there are also cases
that "give water to the mill" to doctors who criticize. "You see
that this homeopathy is a great mess," they press on wounds that
could not be closed... We, the parents of patients, incidentally
or not, know each other. To the news that parents with angels
still sick do not react... We're with them as best we can... But
then, when we go to the homeopathic doctor, we present to him
the problem we have heard of, either out of fear that our young
will not have the same destiny, or at least out of respect due
to them that they have cured our young in the past.
This, calmly, has been through many such situations, tells us
comforting our pride and fears with how much respect they have
at hand: "My dear, earlier your chicken was healed?!? If so, why
does this fear come to your soul? As for the placebo effect?!?
Hmmm... I apologize for the possible acidity of my response but,
the placebo effect involves specific cognitive and
interpretation processes (from the point of view of the strictly
scientific statement), possible only to a subject that
interprets an "about something" information for the effect to be
similar to the interpretation of "something else"... I
administer aspirin by informing the patient that I have given
him "placebo pill in", the best medicine for his condition and
he, following the erroneous processing, placebo as it is called,
will self-heal his condition under the support given by the best
medicine for his condition (possibly a panacea)... Or, a 2-3
month old baby (even a year, two, three) as yours cannot
"benefit" from the placebo effect, because it lacks awareness,
processing of information, of the gesture made, as this "placebo
effect" requires... And you're stuck with your mouth gaping. How
to counter such information?!? How can you not trust me any
further?
And now, speaking of this placebo (attention, accepted by the
medical world)... Hmmm... What would be the "sway" behind that
term... The vast majority of doctors are allowed to respond that
it is about achieving the effect of previous medication (or that
the patient has healed on its own, or that the patient was not
ill or had another diagnosis, etc.), the patient's response is
not a placebo effect but simply a stabilization of his state of
health... Does the information please you? Especially when you
know that you have not followed the treatment and cheated (or in
Romania nowadays you did not have the money to follow this
treatment and "you have an embarrassment" to tell the doctor why
you did not follow the treatment, so in fact, you will just say
that everything was as directed) you end up having "on your
merit" the acute condition "of which you have", taking "placebo"
medication attracting problem-solving simply for reasons other
than that invoked by doctors?!? Many questions about this will
be clarified over the tens of days to come (the dozens of
materials I will make)...
But I'm not done. Now I'd like to discuss (complete) my
genetics. How many of us did not notice in a short time (at the
age of 1, 2, 3 years) similarities of gestures of angels with
the gestures of the parents (this take-over of gestures was also
noticed and attested in the case of children who had no contact
with the parents, for several reasons, until a certain age)?!?
Normally, reflexes of the type sucking, chewing, urination,
defecation, etc., those that educate them carefully from their
first days of life or those that simply exist and contribute to
the functioning of the baby organism... But to smile with the
same crooked mouth, to rub his nose in the same way, to develop
the same gestural tics (I mean those where there is this, and
there are few)... Doctors come to supplement this lack of
information with the "principle of mimicry" (which is, as I have
presented previously, totally disproved with the cases of
abandoned and "found" children – Romania is full of such
abandonments to "those who work outside")... Your child does
nothing but instinctively copy what he perceived around...
Then, side by their dogmatic teachings, I tell them what
happened to my little girl. Shortly after he started to move
better on his feet he started running around the house on all
fours (understand here a kind of displacement using his right
hands and feet and not with his feet "on his knees" – on the
bush). Initially, I perceived it as a tendency for the child to
get to where he or she wanted to go faster. Then this mode of
travel began to be disturbing, especially in front of guests who
looked in amazement at my little girl's horse who was
"wandering" through their legs at a speed that always seemed to
be a danger, literally. There were also jokes like "call another
brother" or more mischievous ones... The fact is that everything
was disturbing until I had the "flash" of memory: when I was
little, for a little freedom, my parents would "ship" me to the
country to my grandparents on my mother's side. There, alone, I
didn't have anyone to play with, and in my mind at the time, I'd
scour the yard for hours running around like a horse, playing
"cowboys and Indians" or "Stefan the Great and the Turks"...
Just like my daughter who bothered me so much... Then I didn't
realize... on the spot... But later, I realized what genetic
transmission of information means... And be sure that my
daughter couldn't follow the "idea" of mimicry because since
childhood I've never run "like a horse" (and I've never seen
anything like it around)...
Subsequently, under the bombardment of different information,
from different sources, I began to receive, to be aware of all
kinds of "elitist" allegations about genetic lines, genetic
potential, etc. Maybe I didn't want to perceive racist,
xenophobic, or elitist themes... Can... What is certain is that
everything I was reading was beginning to shape a collapse in
terms of the sum of ideas underlying my conceptions of new
medicine: "Perhaps classical doctors are right and are willing
to express themselves completely, still, due to the lack of
evidence of their assertions", "Maybe..."... I will debate these
themes in the materials to come...
Already all these "kinds of stuff" tend to eliminate the idea of
spirit, summarizing everything to the power of our body, genetic
inheritance and/ or training in the form of education, culture
absorbed and assimilated, mimicry of the environment of
provenance and development. Even if I stopped my arguments here
and it still comes down to the power of our brain but... can't
stop at him alone...
Spirit is spirit! You will see either tomorrow's sequel or in
the subsequent materials...
BEST weekend to all!!!