To STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine

The New Medicine  - Introduction (5)

Translation draft

I'm now in my exposures about... spirit.

I'm not going to take a typical religious approach. I will try to "link" this to everything that is palpable, scientifically, even through "rhetorical links". So...

Because of everything I read about the spirit, I could not eliminate this connection, this presence in the triad of the new medicine, that represented by the body-mind-spirit.

Current medicine is a perverted and flawed science (or application of it) because it starts from the study of human pathologies in the idea of eliminating diseases, the whole foundation is built on the sick man. And even if the study of healthy man/organism is invoked you will conclude that it all comes down to an ensemble that reacts well structured based on the chemical response (according to Hamer: ... only modern medicine makes us, the living beings, a simple bag filled with chemical formulas where the doctor must complete what is missing or eliminate what is needed). As in the case of alternative medicine (or mild medicine, as it is also called), there is often a limitation to proposing therapeutic solutions based on the same basis as in classical medicine: the disease is something bad, ugly, absurd, a danger to the patient's existence, and there is no other solution than to eliminate it, either by mild or violent methods (especially invasive ones).

Therefore, it comes to a paradox that will not take into account the progress of current medicine (in the sense that it will be maintained, often "maintain" endlessly) that will come to excel in "chemical control" (physiological, histological, etc.)... Interpret even in the sense of "body control"... It doesn't matter anyway... It will only come to this paradox that I remember: Doctors will heal at most temporarily and will "hold" the body to a certain level of normality until it gives way due to the failure to treat the cause (that something that has attracted the imbalance and, even if the "temporary maintenance" is carried out, it returns to the initial imbalance that will attract the same problem... something more serious, you'll see in time why). Time is unrelenting and the adaptability of the body is limited as long as there is no interference with the cause, medical, mental or spiritual... Invariably, the collapse will occur, often more "ample" than the previous one...

Moreover, even in the case of new medicine, the prolongation of conflicts that attract the appearance of the patient's problems (which is nothing more than an adequate response of the brain to an external shock (an imbalance, a real conflict or not), and is part of a program of survival of the species) without creating the conditions of recovery (by closing conflicts) will invariably lead to the inability of the body to get over those problems, and, therefore, the definitive closure of that medical case (by death).

To argue the unrelenting previous statements, they come up with an example related to the body. In this respect, I chose to make a kind of antithesis between cancer "seen" by traditional medicine and cancer seen by Hamer's new German medicine, without me noting that when this is the case there will be a rhetorical "link" related to the spirit, as I announced...

Traditional medicine says that cancer is an exception to the coordinated action between cells and organs. In general, the cells of a multicellular organism are programmed to collaborate. Many diseases occur because specialized cells no longer perform the tasks assigned to them. Cancer takes this poor operation a step further. Not only does the cancer cell not retain the specialized function of the original tissue, but the neoplastic process is to attack its own, with the cancer cell entering the competition for survival with healthy cells (having the ability to invade tissues and metastasize, colonizing remote regions) and, ironically, the more successful they are in gaining independence from environmental influences. , the safer it is to destroy the host and, ultimately, themselves. In their aid, they use mutability and natural selection to gain an advantage over normal cells, in a recapitulation of evolution.

In the case of new medicine, every cancer or disease equivalent to cancer is a well-founded biological program of nature that begins with a traumatic emotional shock (in my opinion many such emotional incidents) that takes us by surprise, being unprepared and/ or weakened by a sum of previous shocks with their consequences all at a relatively high stage of non-resolution. All the worse it will be if this trauma we live in solitude and we don't have solutions to solve it. The intensity of the conflict shock, the "color" of the emotion felt at the time it occurred (with all the sequelae and possibly subsequent returns), determines and then accentuates the affected area of the brain, the physical organ "corresponding" as well as the severity of the disease that will become manifest (physically, concentric rings visible on computed tomography or similar will appear in the brain). At the tissue level, the tumor that will appear has a restorative role, which determines a different belonging of the newly emerged tissue to that attributable as support and, when the imbalance persists until a time when the body no longer has the resources to control that process, it comes to "getting out of control" and the evolutionary struggle that classical medicine recalls (between the supporting tissue and the tumor formation)...

Here we come to specify what is the true "danger" of the tumor, the one that determines all the elements "consequential" with all the subsequent troubles attracted: invasion and the ability to metastasize... But the invasion capacity is present only if that cancer is malignant, the term cancer being synonymous with malignant neoplasm (there is also benign neoplasm that does not invade, having a localized evolution, at least in the statements of traditional medicine, because the new medicine has a different opinion, which I will develop at length later in other posts).

From the point of view of the new medicine, the invasion is part of the reparative process initiated, when correspondence shocks overlap. Thus, a certain emotional shock causes reactions to neighboring organs and thus, the brain is "seen" put in a position to optimize the process and to proceed to the unification of intervention zones, a phenomenon perceived by classical medicine as being framed in an invasion. Metastasis is nothing more than a repair process that got out of control for a wide-by-second...

The problem is that in both ways of considering problems, there are some limitations of justification of brain or body reactions. It comes down to something "above" them... But let's not go into details because both doctors will "intervene" with "justified" aggressions of "we don't have enough details yet but the future will prove that..."... Let's move on!

Cancer is a genetic disease (they say), but at the level of its expression in the cell. Although some forms of cancer can be inherited, most mutations occur in somatic cells and are caused by intrinsic errors in DNA replication or are induced by exposure to carcinogens. A single genetic lesion is usually not enough to induce the neoplastic transformation of a cell. Malignant phenotype is acquired only after a few (5-10, cancer having 10 or more genetic lesions, which explains their biology) mutations (which occur for several years) and lead to changes in several gene products.

So, as we say above, it takes a perpetuation of unfinished conflicts (aggressions at the level of the genetic structure, etc.), a relatively large number of them to appear a reaction of so much importance to the brain and, implicitly, to the body. Further, even if genetics has demonstrated that an entire genetically modified organism, after 2, 3, or 4 generations corrects the genetic error and returns to its original state (provided the modifier environmental factor is eliminated, if it exists, or conforms to the correct environment, for genetic errors "taken" from or from something)...

The more than 200 different types of cells in the body are not equally susceptible to cancerous transformation. Some cells, such as myocardial myocytes, light and sound receptor cells, and crystalline fibers, persist throughout life without dividing or being replaced (neoplasia in such tissues is extremely rare... but there are!!!). Most differentiated tissues participate in a circuit whose characteristics are cell death and its replacement. When the natural rate of this circuit is low, fully differentiated cells can be determined to proliferate and produce fully differentiated daughter cells. Thus, hepatocytes are capable of division to replace aging, damaged (or removed by surgery) liver tissue. In fast-circuit tissues such as the skin, bone marrow, and intestine, differentiated function and replacement function are performed by different cell types.

In normal situations, an individual cell is on one or another path of development which is largely mutually exclusive: division and differentiation. Cells capable of division are undifferentiated (stem cells), while fully differentiated cells are not able to divide. Stem cells produce daughter cells that can either become new stem cells or undergo complete differentiation, depending on the circumstances, including the environment, including the signals coming from the environment. However, stem activity is major in fast-circuit tissues... From this, it is quickly concluded that neoformations occur very frequently in fast-circuit tissues, especially those that are exposed to environmental carcinogens (stressors such as heat, oxidation, irradiation, distortions, or physical tractions) and whose proliferation is regulated by hormones.

Statistics come as a confirmation of this. The most common forms of cancer are those of the lungs and breast (!!!) (group 1 incidence), followed by the intestine, prostate and stomach (group 2), liver, uterus/ cervix, esophagus, and bladder (group 3), followed by leukemia, cancer of the pancreas, kidneys, lips, non-Hodkin lymphoma (NHL – a group of "cancers" of the blood) (group 4) and others (with an incidence of around 15 million new cases annually – probably much higher, because the distribution of cancer is massive in "Western" countries, where there is a real rage of early detection, compared to Africa, Arab countries, India, China, Japan incidence where it is insignificant, literally)... Let's go back!

But the behavior of every cell in the body is strictly regulated by signals that come from the environment (either from the brain or response mechanisms or by feedback as they are called). A cell's ability to respond to a specific set of signals determines whether the cell will live or die, differentiate or proliferate, or remain in "normal" rest/development. In normal cells and tissues, coordinated action, such as wound healing or inflammatory response, is regulated by signaling pathways that convert extracellular signals into specialized actions at the level of "responsible" cells.

In the cancer cell, the process of invasion and metastasis is influenced by signal transduction paths, activated by paracrine and autocrine factors. The main changes in the cell are those of the cellular "skeleton" and the response to contact-mediated growth inhibition (often observed in such cells) favoring the high level of mutability that facilitates adaptation to the environment, including the development of drug resistance. Also, evolution in discrete stages leads to the production of factors by tumor cells, which allow neovascularization to ensure the transport of nutrients to the developing tumor. Other mutations allow the tumor to avoid mechanisms of immunological surveillance. Pretty organized all this development, isn't it?

But according to the new medicine, tissue reactions considered to be tumors are nothing more than a necessary and sufficient response to resolve a conflict. From here to infer that the tumor in question does not in any way fool the body and its defense mechanisms, is only one step. Then why does it come to "get out of control"... The independence of the new structures is ensured by the new structure of the cell wall which can delimit itself, self-develop, autovascularize, etc. according to certain needs and thus we reach the possible "controlled" loss under control. But in this case, the brain and the vegetative nervous system, those that manage these "developments" have no way of losing control, so how to get to uncontrolled proliferation. Does it come down to a necessary reaction that cannot be of the brain and the autonomous "vegetative" that have the "obligation" to ensure the viability of the organism? Is there another element of control? In the triad presented by me, all that's left is... the spirit, isn't it?

So, we've now come to the cancer cell characteristic that has dominated clinical thinking, the one related to their uncontrolled proliferation... It seems that the growth fraction of most human cancers are usually not greater than the capacity of normal human cells. Besides, most human cancerous tissues are difficult to grow for longer periods (in vitro - tumors that occur naturally and grow in vivo exhibit an exponential reduction rate of their growth fraction because the daughter cells resulting from a division are not uniformly able to divide afterward. The accumulation of genetic damage, insufficient oxygen or nutrient supply, and other unknown factors contribute to the aging of some of the tumor cells so that when a tumor becomes clinically manifest, to a tumor load of 10 to the power of the 8th or 9th cells, most of the tumor proliferation capacity is exhausted).

It is not, somehow, a mechanism of balance, possibly ensuring that everything has a purpose even when it loses direct control of the brain or feedback mechanisms?!? Then why would we have to deal with the invasion, the metastases, and finally all the headaches born of cancer? Why does the process continue?!?

We are now reaching invasion and metastases, the cascade of biochemical and genetic events mediated by multiple pathways of signal and molecular systems transduction. Invasion (with its triad represented by cellular adhesion, local proteolysis, and locomotion/ motility... Another triad, but on which I will not give details, at least now, is necessary for metastasis. The critical pathological point for the patient is the initiation of local invasion and neovascularization (which are very early events in cancer, which occur frequently even years before the clinical detection of cancer), leading to the dissemination of tumor cells. Angiogenesis (the process of formation of blood vessels) induced by the tumor (in fact, which announces the tumor, possibly one and favors) provides a vascular entry gate for dispersion, which can precede by many years the growth of the primary tumor. Circulation of tumor cells is necessary, but not sufficient because circulating tumor cells can be detected in patients who never develop metastases.

This clinical observation is supported by experimental studies, which indicate that the initiation of metastasis from circulating tumor cells is an event with a low probability (less than 0.05%, incomparable, for example, with the overall metastasis rate of more than 90%).

Metastasis, like tumorogenesis, occurs only after a sufficient number of tumor cells, with indispensable genotypic and phenotypic changes, enter into "circulation" (say, allopathic doctors). Invasion is the active translocation of neoplastic cells through tissue barriers and host cell and extracellular matrix barriers. This is not only due to the "pressure" of growth but requires a genetic and additional signal irregularity, which causes malignant transformation. The invasion results from the imbalance and irregularity of otherwise normal inhibitory and stimulatory events. The strictly controlled invasion occurs in many normal physiological events, such as the maintenance and remodeling of an organ, pregnancy, development, and wound healing.

In cancer, this regulation is absent or attenuated, so malignant cells may not respond to the signals coming from them and may rely on their autocrine stimulation. In addition to invasion, metastasis requires angiogenetic and malignant cell proliferation. The success of metastasis requires that malignant cells reach secondary localization, then successfully form "sustained" colonies at the secondary site and avoid the host's local and systemic defense mechanisms (especially in vascularized organs of the blood and lymph flow downstream, referring to its circulation and meaning towards the "starting point" of the metastasis). Thus, the invasion process is a relatively individual process, in which the cell must be able to execute each of the necessary steps (and there are few).

According to the "data" provided by the new medicine, we will synthesize the above all rhetorically... Why is it necessary to have a well-structured process, "positioned" necessary or not over a longer period necessary to "fulfill" some steps, situations (multiple gene mutations, angiogenetic structuring, tumor insertion points, reaching a "critical mass"... and others)? New medicine says it's a perpetual emotional shock (or more, be they unrelated but have the same internal "projection" on organs/tissues), right? So it can be said that the control organ, the brain, forgets what it did over time, that it doesn't master what it started, even if there are all kinds of levers of control? Or is it something external to them, to their body and soul? Perhaps that is why there is a sense of betrayal felt by those who have manifest, "known"/felt forms of what we call cancer?!?

One of the consequences of this "traitorous" behavior of cancer/cancer cells is that the patient feels betrayed by his own body. The cancer patient feels that he, as a person, and not a part of his body, is sick. All this medicine comes and states that carcinogenesis is not an event, but a process, a series of discrete cellular changes that result in processes that become progressively autonomous. All this would be eliminated if the genetic, biological, and environmental factors that intervene in the way of causal events are identified and manipulated (the most well-known measures in this regard are the elimination of smoking, the modification of the diet to eliminate fats, and the cessation of exposure to chemicals in food, the avoidance of exposure to the sun and others based either on the chemicals with which the individual may come into contact, etc.).

And if it shows up, the best method... Opa... even they doctors recognize that early detection itself does not represent an advantage of the patient (for those who do not believe I will at least give them the name of a reference work in which to "find" this statement - Harrison's Internal Medicine Treaty - vol. I, p. 546). Rapid detection offers only the possibility of a treatment that has a better result than the treatment performed at the onset of symptoms. That's all...

And, as for detection, if the current medical world claims that metastasis is primarily supported by the migration of cancer cells, like a kind of "seed," why do they only determine blood what they called "tumor markers"?!? Why don't they have cancer testing, effectively?!? Not because the incidence of such cells in the blood is very close to zero or even zero?!? Then a bladder cancer, for example, has basal tissue support on which it has developed. So, kind of a type of differentiation. Current doctors have never explained how such a cell manages to "stick" to an organ, with cells of another type, and develop a new form of cancer...

I don't know what information you have, but metastases are custom tissue, not "uniform". Cancer that originally started in the bladder (since we chose it), develops cellular metastasis with modified bladder cells?!? No, no way... It's going to form a kind of cancer of cerebral peculiarity. It's not some kind of virus that propagates (which has attracted a lot of medical confusion on this subject)... Let's go back (I hope you understand what I wanted to point out)...

Now it would be good if I do a "review" of these problems (because there are many and I'm not going to write a treat just about it)...

Thus, the most common forms of cancer (in a list, the incidence statistics being given above) are represented by nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma (so-called skin cancer), head and neck cancers (paranasal sinus tumors, oral cavities, nasopharynx, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and larynx, as well as tumors of the salivary glands or thyroid), pulmonary neoplasms (lung cancer), breast cancer, gastrointestinal tract cancer (with its species represented by esophageal cancer, stomach tumors, colorectal cancer, tumors of the small intestine, cancers of the anus), tumors of the liver and biliary tract, pancreatic cancer, endocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas, bladder and kidney cancer, hyperplasia and prostate carcinoma, testicular cancer, ovarian cancer, carcinoma of the fallopian tubes, uterine body cancer, bone, and soft tissue sarcophagi and carcinogenic metastases of a primitive neoplasm with unknown localization (or known). This may include paraneoplastic syndromes with their endocrine, hematological, paraneoplastic neurological manifestations and, why not, obstructive structures attracted to cancer...

Almost every part of the human body... Because the brain "masters" almost everything in this body? Because the spirit masters almost everything in the brain-body relationship? Because the subconscious and the autonomic vegetative nervous system are an interface between them?!? Or it's all a whole?!?

As for cancer treatment... Hmmm... What am I supposed to say? I think it is enough to make a list of the methods, often combined (even mandatory) of treatment of current medicine: surgical therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy... Is that enough? Why isn't the new medicine included yet?!?

And a little case study, to complete this episode of my posts once and for all... Old friend... With a good life, no money at his disposal, no drinking, no smoking, no forced awakening (at a certain time) unless he went on a trip "abroad", the heart of OM that helps anyone, if he could, without expecting rewards or counter-services, making everything out of conviction, full of success, the head of an enviable family "literally" (beautiful, smart and faithful wife who loved him at least as he, a little girl "angel, nothing else")... What's going on, a real landmark in this tormented life of our day...

And, at some point, he gives me the news that he has colon cancer (with liver metastases, etc.)... "Come on, man?!? How could that be?!? came the answer of many of us, his friends or acquaintances. "What advice do you give me?" comes his "request" for help... Probably, a lot of people did it like me... I couldn't believe that... And our man having many friends, having money, whatever, starts a nightmare strung out over six surgeries, "spiced" with radio and chemo, and finally, the acceptance one, he started to resort to the medical alternatives that he had at his disposal.

He also turned to some common knowledge, including myself... To my shame I can't remember what advice I gave him, even when I gave him (shame!), being the kind who does everything spontaneously, straight from what I feel and know... But what I remember before he embarrassed me by some of the "strawberries" of my life, as a kind of last advice that he could give me with the power of the dying, of the "closer to God", of the one held by the thin angels of angels so that he could carry something in the end, he told me, breathing hard after every word. , making everything take a long time, "almost as long as a lifetime": "I'd rather listen to you and not go to the doctors. The stability of the energy balance, the contentment for everything I have and experience, is more important than anything!!! Now it's too late, I'm too chopped up and too irradiated. I'd rather choose angel therapy. I've seen and talked to enough since I've been through this ordeal. My soul was the problem and tired. He wants somewhere else. He wants his chances..."...

And, gone, leaving us at just 37 years old...

So, what else can I say?!? I have nothing but to quote Hamer, Giorgio Mambretti, and Jean Seraphin: The "Keystone" of healing is the elimination of emotional shock, an essential condition that the brain can make its way back and move from the roar of the sea when it is at sea, to the calm waters of the port (Provided that the craft in which it is located does not run out of fuel on the way - If this happens, all therapies that can bring a little fuel into the empty tank of the craft, such as allopathy, acupuncture, homeopathy, magnetism, shamans, faith, etc.) will be welcome. And in the end, it should not be forgotten that just as, after a hard day's work, our body needs the night to rest, so does our Soul (Spirit), after a life of evolutionary work, needs rest - and he is the one who will decide day and time.

Strange resemblance to what has been recorded historically about the medicine of our Dacians. Strange resemblance to Viorel R's last message.

And, for today, I conclude with Hamer, even though I repeat myself: "For thousands of years, humanity has experienced the fact that all diseases are, after all, of psychic origin; it constitutes a scientific date well recorded in the heritage of universal knowledge; only modern medicine makes us, the living beings, a simple bag filled with chemical formulas."

I still have a lot to say about the soul... Now I've kind of introduced the introduction... I'm going to keep... certainly!!!

And one more thing... I'm really tired... I'm almost sure I'm not able to make these materials every day, even though I've succeeded so far... So... I apologize for the "thinning" of the material that's to come... I'm sorry even for not being able to do this... But they're all on a road and they're all going to be done in their own time. EVERYTHING IS PERFECT IN MY LIFE!

Tomorrow is the great baptism of Jesus Christ! Blessed be His name!