To STUDY - Technical - New Dacian's Medicine
The First Step of Energy (Part I)
Certainly, in the
beginning, there was nothing. Only Supreme Divine Power...
Possibly darkness too.. Then there was what the scientists call
to be the "Big Bang". Others say that, at that time, the Divine
Power made light and we had to deal with the "God Bang" (the
"God Word" – God's word): Fiat Lux! (Let there be Light!)
(Genesis 1:3).
And there was light. And
God saw that the light was good, and God separated the light
from the darkness (Genesis 1:3-4).
It doesn't matter how much
time has passed since then. Scientists have estimated that 13.7
billion years (or 13.8 billion years) have passed since the Big
Bang. People of "religion" say that everything "happened" a
maximum of 4,000 - 7,000 years ago, or another time. I will not
limit myself to these details because, anyway, it was a start, a
beginning...
From this moment on, space
and time appeared, and, thus, "everything was set in motion".
And, of course, from this moment came the energy from which,
later, the matter will appear, all the matter that composes the
universe known and unknown to us, being a real explosion of
space and not an explosion in space.
In the case of the Divine
Power, things were much simpler because, from the beginning,
everything was done (no matter how many days). Scientists say
that every point in space was involved in this "Big Bang" or
"God Bang", wherever you were when you had nowhere else to be
but inside this space, the "Big Bang"/ the "God Bang".
How did the scientists
come to this conclusion: that there was a big explosion?!?
Simple. They know certain things such as the speed of light and,
with its help, they "look" through time.
The most distant galaxies
are 13.7 billion light-years away, and so we see the past in
this way. That's because the light needs 13.7 billion years to
reach us (from the emission point to the receiving point). And
so, the earliest times, due to the time required for light to
reach us, become the new contemporary time to us.
Thus we see the history of
everything around us, from the astral bodies. Even the light
that leaves the Sun takes more than 8 minutes to reach us, and
the Sun that we see is the one from 8 minutes ago.
Thus, looking more and
more towards the edges of the universe we already see a picture
of what happened then, more and more anciently. Thus, just as a
movie is given back, scientists knew (have power) to unfold
(rewind) the events of evolution after the "great explosion" to
discover when this moment was: 13.7 – 13.8 billion years.
The others, the
"worshipers" took the holy books and it was not difficult for
them to turn back in a kind of similar effort by aggregating
generations of biblical characters (similar to other cults) to
discover this "original" moment.
But this act, of giving
the movie back, was for scientists only the first step. They
discovered that, given that the great explosion started from
nothing, from a single extremely small point, it happened in its
entirety, that of the universe.
Yes, it sounds weird, "A
point as the size of a universe." Or, moreover, "From absolutely
nothing to the whole universe". And the universe is so vast
that, for our mind, it’s hard to imagine. 400 billion galaxies.
Distributed in the Universe described by the size of 150 billion
light-years.
Also, we cannot fail to
notice a great similarity with "everything was done at once," as
those who give the Divine Powers the righteousness of everything
that is and has been done.
At that time it seems that
the laws that governing our universe have begun to manifest,
starting with gravity. Why ”her”?!? Scientists have come to a
consensus that tends to become unanimous: gravity is an effect
of space-time distortion (of the manifestations of its
equilibrium).
And, if something like
this was found, possibly just a space-time distortion, it’s
obvious that time has appeared. The time that has confirmed the
"space-time canvas" cannot exist without gravity. At least in
terms of what is known in the times when I write these lines.
But it’s a different kind
of time than we perceive now. For example, the age of the
universe, from the point of view of scientists, is 13.8 billion
years but the size is 150 billion light-years.
Mathematically, it would
have been the size of 13.8 (radius of a circle distribution
following an explosion/expansion) or 2 equal 27.6 billion
light-years… But it is hugely higher, 150 billion light-years …
Well, anyway it's all about creation.
Going back to gravity, we
don’t know how much it was then but we do know how much much it
is now. It is exactly "as much as it should be" because it is
born by the very manifestation of the universe itself as a
direct evolution of transformation, as a balance compensation
(and, from what you will read in what follows, it also comes
from the surrounding layers of our universe included in the
quantum multiverse).
If it were less everything
would have been without form, without stars, galaxies and what
we know is that it is in the universe, because the "explosive
expansion" would have continued. And if there was more, a little
more than it is now, everything would have gone to a black hole
universe. But it is exactly as it should be because the
space-time distortions that give birth to gravity are those born
of the universe itself in the compensatory balance.
Strange coincidence, isn't
it? Everything seems so well directed that it is difficult to
exclude a divine manifestation, a "God Bang" or "Big God" (or,
at least, to accept the translation of the holographic principle
in all considerations, as you will see).
But, if nothing has become
all, why is there talk of the Big Bang? Scientists speculate
that a fraction of a second from the start of this Big Bang
followed a huge explosion in the form of a shock wave of energy
(of course) that expanded the universe in all directions at an
incredible speed, hugely above the limit speed of our universe
represented by the speed of light (nearly 300,000 km/s).
Maybe the time was
different from what it’s now (again this ”problem”). Then, to
explain this, they needed to "invent" a new unit of measurement
for time, called the “Plank time”.
Thus, in a second, as we
know it, there are more Plank units of time than all the seconds
that have passed since the Big Bang. This concept, even
according to the scientists, "makes human intuition useless".
Wouldn't it be easier if
they were paying attention to their statements about space-time
distortions and accepting that there there was no time, then, in
the "Plank area"? Or, at least, to accept that the universe was
already everything, the whole, nearly what it is now, at least
energetically, as the "worshipers" claim?!?
After all, at this
starting point, called the "Great Explosion", everything was
energy, and subsequently, in its evolution towards "everything",
remained energy, the ratio of any kind of space-time having no
time component. Yes, the statement is strange but, in my
opinion, there was no time, one that gives meaning, value, and
existence to the current Universe. But for now, it's OK with
this Plank time.
To go further, it’s
necessary to present many "details" that will appear at the
right time for my presentation.
Thus, within a few
moments Plank was born the universe as we know it as its
dimension, but not as "aspect". According to scientists, it was,
at first, only a "raging" storm of overheated energy (although
"overheated" has no meaning because it is all about energy -
heat is the manifestation of energy, and so on, possibly
accepting their arguments only in comparison with a maximum
thermal level that can be found in the current universe, current
today).
But, they come and
complete with the fact that as the universe "expanded" to its
current dimensions, it cooled down. And this cooling has led to
the next steps in transforming the universe from a mass of
"raging energy" into what we know now.
As a kind of conclusion of
the moment, now would be the beginning of what religions
identify as chaos, the indefinable… But both sides are right,
describing or intuiting the same thing. And the earth (all) was
unmade and empty. Darkness was over the deep and the Spirit of
God moved over the waters (energy) (Genesis 1:2).
The first step in this
transformation was the appearance of energy aggregations and,
implicitly, the appearance of subatomic particles (but which
still have no mass). Only now can we talk about some kind of the
first form of matter in the universe (the beginning of the
disintegration of chaos).
About this form of
manifestation of matter Albert Einstein "talked about", years
before anyone spoke about the Big Bang, in his famous formula
"energy = mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light" (E
= mc2).
Above all, energy can be
converted into mass (of course, and vice versa), and, in the
continuity of reasoning, energy has given the possibility of the
mass of the universe to appear.
From my point of view (and
many researchers), this equation assumes that there is no Plank
time (in fact, there is no time) because there is the "speed of
light" (which has its “time content" being an expression defined
by "meters per second”, so it cannot exist without time - so
time will appear later or the universe was already everything,
mass, time and… light).
There is also a
scientific, intuitive explanation, which states that it is not
possible to "discuss" at this moment about distance but only
time (be it Plank time) because, of course, every point of the
expanding space was "there", without physically moving.
Only the space moves to
its dimensions.
So the lack of mass of
subatomic particles existing at this time and the lack of
distance and time to "justify" the speed of light leads us to
the conclusion that the initial energy of the universe was
"zero" (any of the "elements" of Einstein's famous formula being
zero results that the energy of the universe, even at this
moment of creation, is zero... or infinity).
Also, a "something"
without mass can only have the speed of light, so mass is needed
for a "something" to "slow down" and be something other than
light.
In short, it is either
accepted that the universe already had the full dimensions, it
was "everything", or it is accepted that time appeared from this
moment, of the appearance of matter (but for this the universe
was at its "everything" dimension).
From what I will present
in the future, it will be seen that this is a universe with a
holographic manifestation, among a stratified multiverse, in
which touching the "surrounding" layers (multiverse) with our
universe attracted the instantaneous appearance of the universe
known to us by simple holographic, instantaneous translation.
But, in a layered
structure of the multiverse, it is obvious that we reach the
initial universe layer, and thus all the considerations of the
scientists would be applicable at least for it (see what
follows). But let's return, leaving aside details like the
absence of time!
“Absence” which cannot
lead to a conclusion other than that of a work of one or more
Divine Powers… Which, however, behaved, acted as scientists
discovered who rely almost exclusively on the identifiable, on
present…
In those "moments" the
universe didn’t look as far away as we now know because there
were no atoms. It also looked like a kind of energy soup in
which energy became matter (in the form of aggregations that
formed subatomic particles) and matter became energy again
(against the background of an instability given by too much
energy content, content that thermally "dissolves" the subatomic
particles that are formed, in a sort of "appears-disappears"
game).
As you will see, the
subatomic world is a world in continuous manifestation (and,
implicitly, in change) where subatomic particles at high
energies produce instantaneous position translations depending
on the manifestations of the quark particles that compose them,
changing them, both the position and the "form of
manifestation/existence" (the proton becoming neutron or
electron, etc.).
Therefore, it was
necessary to cool (the decrease of the "thermal/ energy
content", entropy) to proceed to the next step, the one
represented by the "stabilization" of the subatomic particles
and, subsequently, the appearance of the atoms.
Cooling to be understood
as translating, "investing" energy into something, possible only
through investing in the matter, something else not existing
subsequently. So, the first "born" step of this cooling, against
the background of "occurrence" and existence of subatomic
nuclear particles, was represented by the emergence of nuclear
"strong force".
As a "scientific"
parenthesis, "strong force" ("strong" interaction) is one of the
four fundamental interactions known at this time (in addition to
gravity, "weak force" and electromagnetism). And it has this
name because, for example, it is 137 times stronger than the
electromagnetic interaction in a range of 10 to -15 meters (a
femtometer - 10-15 m), a million times greater than
the "weak force" and 10 to power 38 (1038) than
gravity.
And, this "strong force"
is "guilty" of "entangling" the atomic nuclei, as it "gathering"
quarks in hadron particles such as protons and neutrons,
limiting emissions of gluons (free radiation), considering that
it is the basis of formation of atomic nuclei (I will not give
further details).
This manifestation will
lead to the coagulation of the first forms of mass which, under
the action of other forces, especially gravity, will lead to the
incipient accumulations that will become mass accumulations.
At this moment occur, a
scientific concept enunciated in 1979 by Alan Guth, that of the
theory of inflation. Factually, wherever we look in the
universe, we find that there is an identical number of stars,
galaxies, or formations similar to those that exist exactly on
the opposite side of the universe, regardless of the direction
in which we look.
Of course, no one explains
why this distribution exists. It is as if a "line" of the
universe comes into contact with the opposite, symmetrical
(identical in terms of structure, composition, etc.) in a
central, point of "equilibrium".
This is where the
inflation that underlies the beginning of the "immense
development" reported in time, like an explosion of the space
"that brought chaos to order", that order "in the mirror" found
now by scientists.
Now, gravity (a direct
result of space-time distortions and the influence of the
external universal layers of the multiverse) manifests itself
"distorted", incipiently, determining the distribution of matter
in the universe we have today, gravitational waves can be
"detected" (even if not visualized) by studying the microwave
background of the space and "noticing the distribution of matter
in the universe".
There is still something
to be said about the "coagulation" of matter, as it was then,
and it is detected nowadays by scientists. More specifically,
why did it "coagulate" in this way?
Well, it is a certainty in
the scientific world that there are more dimensions than those
"offered" by the human senses (whether they are descriptible by
a divine "word"). And, quite debatable, there are more
dimensions, more universes, so more times… Maybe this is where
the statement "in this time and this dimension" comes from.
Then there would be the
holographic principle that can only reconstruct the "original".
So, everything can be an act of "holographic" reconstruction, if
it can be said so, in another dimension, with another time.
Then there would be a kind
of interaction of the multiverse on this universe, through
gravity, the grouping of initial proto-matter being a result of
the gravitational action of the "surrounding" universes…
Following these
considerations, we reach a point from which, eventually, we can
reach something different from the original through the
intervention of "something", through divine intervention, it
doesn’t matter.
If everything is
identical, like a kind of DNA replication or something similar,
everything can stop here, at some kind of initial point from
where a subsequent evolution that involving the existence of
time will occur. But what if there is "something" that created
this system, or at least, the next evolution?
Anyone who has worked in
3D graphics knows that "mirroring" helps to reconstruct any 3D
object that’s being worked on, then proceed to "modeling"
(”shaping”), customizing that object.
If we take into account a
kind of starting point of a universe that will replicate
"holographically", "gravitational", etc. we reach that "initial"
point where we will find a kind of starting point quite
connected to construction, possibly an initial evolution, from
which customization occur.
So, here we have enough
forms to describe those moments without entering into the
"cryptic" scientific language that describes this "coagulation",
even taking into account those described by the "primitive"
language of those who tried to write the word of a deity
describing what scientists say.
There would be something
more to say about the inflation theory. Once the universe's
inflation is "started", it can only be stopped in a place called
by scientists "a new universe".
Something like that, when
inflation will stop, a new universe opens up (from what will
follow you will see that there will be touch with one of the
layers adjacent to our universe, layers of the multiverse, and
it will realize the "inflation" energy discharge in a new
big-bang, one of the universes that will "start" its development
then).
So it will not be an end
but just a kind of final stabilization of this universe that has
completed a stage of its development, following a new entropic
stage that can only be intuited at this time.
Even religious sources,
consciously or not, describe a continuation of evolution, in
heaven or hell, with or without the body and other circumstances
imaginable by humans thousands of years ago.
And, given the current
discoveries of quantum physics related to multiverses, this
becomes something unanimously accepted ... But, about that, a
little later.
At this point in the
description of evolution, the first order ”passed” after the
"perfect order". Thus, the subatomic particles no longer
"changed" into energy (they didn’t return to their initial state
– at least in a weight of more than 50%).
Now is the "time" when it
is “proposed” that particles begin to have mass due to an
interaction with a hypothetical "Higgs field" (after the name of
the researcher, Peter Higgs, who launched this hypothesis in the
1960s – the "finding" of the Higgs boson being the basic element
that confirmed this theory).
In my opinion (and others)
is nothing more than a direct transformation effect, something
that already existed "as it is", possibly, at most, being a
direct effect of the interaction with the dark matter (we’ll
talk about it later) or a compensatory component for space-time
distortions.
It is only certain that
the "action" of this particle has led to the appearance of mass
and, implicitly, the appearance of atomic particles that would
attract the formation of the first atoms and, implicitly, of
matter as we know it now.
Maybe that's why, in the
physicist's world, the Higgs boson was called the "God's
particle". Or maybe, because the Higgs boson caused the initial
super-force imbalance, before the Big Bang (an imbalance that
caused the "Big Bang")?!?
But then what do we do
with Plank time?!? Does it still have any real meaning or do we
"hold" it forcibly to have a "historical explanation" scientific
substrate.
And thus, here, at this
moment, appeared the "weak force" and the electromagnetic forces
began to manifest because the "seeds of matter" appeared (as it
exists, it manifests and evolves at this moment). Thus the
balance of the four forces (interactions) that formed and govern
the present universe was achieved: the weak force, the strong
(nuclear) force, the electromagnetism, and the gravity.
The researchers say that,
at this point, the "titanic battle" between matter and
antimatter began and, in their opinion, the cancellation of most
of the "matter" elements that existed at that time. Given that
everything was energy and the terms "matter" and "antimatter"
are (with certainty) prematurely used, it is obvious that the
meaning of "discussions" is quite different.
Also, it is unanimously
accepted by scientists that the "structure" of subatomic
particles (in their current manifestation) is represented by
energy quants (hence the term "quantum physics"), or by the
energy strings.
These are energetic
manifestations (given by space-time distortion - ?!?) whose
vibration (manifestation in the form of a string, of a vibrating
energy line) depends on which subatomic particle results.
If this string has a
certain vibration it becomes quark, another vibration gives a
proton, if it has another vibration it becomes a neutron, and so
on in the manifestations of an electron, meson, tachyon, boson,
and how many particles are known and unknown at this time.
So, by deduction, it is
obvious that matter is "delimited" (defined, or any other
similar term) by a form of energy vibration, similar (or "in the
mirror") to the "delimitation" of antimatter.
For a better understanding
of my "descriptions", further, in the documentation I will make,
I will also use the term "quants" of energy even if it is
correctly descriptive and that of "strings/energy strings".
That's because, in essence, it's about a quantum of energy.
Let's go back!
In their descriptions,
scientists tell us that contact between matter and antimatter
results in the cancellation of matter and antimatter with a
large (huge) release of energy.
But at least I notice only
the nonsense of the statement. The matter is energy, antimatter
is energy, they are canceled upon "contact" and result in
energy. I'm right with nonsense?!? So here I’ll start a rather
scientific discussion, to be able to understand something…
I will start with the
well-known atomic bomb from Hiroshima… The destructive effect of
this bomb is due to the nuclear fission (breaking) of only 65 kg
of "enriched" uranium (extremely rudimentary compared to current
techniques)…
I want to emphasize how
much energy was released only by this fission and not the
annulment of matter by the interaction of 32.5 kg of matter with
32.5 kg of antimatter (total 65 kg). The result of the release
of energy would have been huge, almost unimaginable…
Now I will "get” into some
details of pure physics (or chemistry).
The immense energy of the
atomic bomb was the result of "breaking" a larger atom into two
or more smaller ones under the conditions of a chain reaction…
But the annulment of the matter is completely different because
it is a much larger process, which involves much more
"components".
Let's see what components
would have an atom of matter, including that of a similar
antimatter atom but "inverse".
Going further on the
reasoning of scientists, for example, an atom has a content
called the nucleus, of final resultant charge (the sum of the
potentials of the subatomic particles that compose it) which is
positive and which permanently "seeks" a negative charge in the
form of an electron to achieve equilibrium (possibly coupling
with another atom to compensate for the lack of the electron or
electrons needed to achieve balance).
Well, even these bonds,
even in "primordial" atoms, require or release energy to "break"
them.
There would be an
"interesting nuance" to comment on. What does "positive load"
mean and "negative load"?!?
Based on minimal knowledge
of atomic physics (possibly quantum physics), you will
"perceive" that the electron (subatomic particle, lepton,
fundamental - meaning that no components or substrates of it are
known) is/constitutes "negative electric charge".
The electrons "orbiting"
around the atomic nucleus where all the other known subatomic
particles are located.
Another "property" of them
is that they can "leave" (quite easily) the respective atom
(from which they "belong") without affecting the "belonging" to
the respective atom (the chemical element), determining only the
possibility, that atom, of "coupling into molecules" or with
other atoms, forming different chemicals (determining the
chemical properties).
Now come interesting
details about these electrons. Being fermions (belonging to the
first generation of the lepton particle family), two electrons
cannot occupy the same quantum state, following the Pauli
principle, of exclusion. Then, like all elementary particles,
these are both particle and wave.
For this reason, electrons
play an essential role in many physical phenomena, such as
electricity, magnetism, chemistry, and thermal conductivity,
also participating in the gravitational, electromagnetic, and
"weak force" interactions.
Since the electron has a
charge, it has an "environmental" electric field, its motion
also determining a magnetic field. So, we’re talking about an
electromagnetic field, under the conditions of motion. The
magnetic fields produced from other sources will interact in the
motion of an electron, according to Lorentz's law.
Finally, it should be
remembered that electrons, when accelerated, radiate, or absorb
energy in the form of photons.
Within the limits of
experimental accuracy, the charge of an electron is equal to the
charge of a proton (but of opposite sign).
The physicists have
delimited that the positive electric charge would be given by
the proton, which is/constitutes the "positive electric charge",
is a subatomic particle, a component of the nucleus (it is a
nucleon, classified as a hadron, like neutrons), however not
being a "fundamental particle" (although, spontaneously, there
are no free protons, "proving that this is a stable particle").
Moreover, the number of
protons in the atomic nucleus is known as the "atomic number",
which determines the chemical element to which the atom belongs.
Variations in the number of protons, even if not all the atoms
of an element are necessarily identical (isomers and isotopes,
including protonated molecules or, as they are known, Bronsted
acids), cause different behavior to the reference chemical
element.
The free proton, which is
not bound to nucleons or electrons, is a stable particle that
has not been observed to decompose spontaneously into particles.
But, for a proton to be naturally free, an energy-filled
environment is needed where temperatures are high enough to
separate protons from electrons, for which they have a certain
affinity.
Thus, free protons exist
in plasma, which has a temperature too high to allow protons to
combine with electrons. Free protons of high energy and velocity
make up 90% of the cosmic rays.
Therefore, under the
"usual" environment conditions of nature and human achievements,
the negative electric charge means extra electrons, positive
means minus electrons (because protons streams cannot be
discussed under the conditions described).
In the "advantage" of the
aforementioned, it can be presented that the ratio between the
mass of a proton to that of an electron is about 1836 (the
proton has a mass greater than the electron 1836 times).
We will consider the fact
that the atomic nucleus has a "positive electric charge" and, of
course, the electrons will give the state of "negative electric
charge" ...
In short, we have
electrons, we have a negative charge, we don’t have electrons,
we have a positive charge. “I” is negative, “I don’t” is
positive. But there’s still ”a gap” to be discussed. And that’s
because the proton is a "component" of the nucleus and doesn’t
"walk" too easily.
Finally, the astronomical
measurements show that the ratio of proton-electron mass
retained the same value, as provided in the "standard model",
for at least half the age of the universe. The other half of the
age of the universe, the one at the beginning, has its
peculiarities, as we shall see.
(Processing Post January 28, 2015/ 2017/ 2020 dorinm.ro and blog on wordpress)
Dorin, Merticaru